(Re)Counting the poor in Peru: a multidimensional approach

Castro, Juan F. and Baca, Jessica and Ocampo, Juan P. (2010): (Re)Counting the poor in Peru: a multidimensional approach.

Abstract

After an impressive 12 point reduction in Peruvian monetary poverty, questions have been raised about the extent in which these figures mask deprivation in several other aspects critical for human development. We propose using the Alkire-Foster multidimensional headcount to address this issue, and devise a simple comparison framework to measure the tension between the incidence of monetary poverty and the overall level of deprivation based on the multidimensional measure. We select six dimensions and their respective indicators for the Peruvian case, and apply this framework using data for 2004 and 2008. Results indicate that we now face a larger risk of classifying as non-poor individuals who still endure significant deprivation if we rely on the conventional monetary dimension. In addition, inter and intraregional comparisons show that deprivations endured by the multidimensional poor are similar across regions and concentrated on the health and dwelling conditions dimensions, in particular, on the lack of adequate water and sanitation services. This last result reveals an opportunity to focalize public investment efforts.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Multidimensional poverty; monetary poverty; Peru.
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Alkire, S. and J. Foster (2008), “Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement”, OPHI Working Paper Series No. 07, OPHI.

Atkinson, A. (1987), “On the Measurement of Poverty”, Econometrica, 55(4), pp. 749-764.

Battiston, D., G. Cruces, L.F. López, M. Lugo and M. Santos, (2009), “Income and Beyond: Multidimensional Poverty in six Latin American countries”. OPHI Working Paper No. 17, OPHI.

Castro, J.F. (2008), “Política Fiscal y Gasto Social en el Perú: Cuánto se ha avanzado y qué más se puede hacer para reducir la vulnerabilidad de los hogares”, Apuntes 62, Lima: Universidad del Pacifico.

Chakravarty, S.R. (1983), “A new index of poverty”, Mathematical social Sciences, 6(3), pp. 307-313.

Collantes, H. y J. Escobedo, “Más allá de lo monetario: cómo evalúan su bienestar los peruanos”, Apuntes 60/61, Lima: Universidad del Pacífico.

Duclos, J.-Y. and A. Araar (2006), Poverty and Equity Measurement, Policy, and Estimation with DAD, Berlin and Ottawa: Springer and IDRC.

ECLAC (2009), “Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean”, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Foster, J., J. Greer, and E. Thorbecke, (1984), “A class of decomposable poverty measures”, Econometrica, 52(3), pp. 761-766.

Herrera, J. (2001), “Food requirements and deficits, Peru 1997-2000”. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática – Institut de recherche pour le Développment.

Kapteyn, A., S. van de Geer and H. van de Stadt, (1985), “The Impact of Changes in Income and Family Composition on Subjective Measures of Well-Being”, in: M. David and T. Smeeding (eds.), Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty and Economic Well-Being, University of Chicago.

Loayza, N. and R. Polastri (2004): “Poverty and Growth in Peru”, Background Report for Peru’s Poverty Assessment, the World Bank.

Monge, A. and R. Ravina (2003), “Más allá del componente objetivo en la medición de la pobreza: análisis geográfica de las dimensiones objetiva y subjetiva en el Perú”. In: Vásquez, E. (Ed.), Buscando el bienestar de los pobres ¿Cuán lejos estamos?, Lima: CIUP.

Sen, A. (1976). “Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement”, Econometrica, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 219-231.

Yamada, G. and J.F. Castro (2007), “Poverty, Inequality and Social Policies in Perú: As poor as it gets”, Documento de Discusion CIUP DD/07/06.