Othman, Jamal (2003): Linking Agricultural Trade, Land Demand and Environmental Externalities: Case of Oil Palm in South East Asia. Published in: ASEAN Economic Bulletin , Vol. 20, No. 3 (December 2003): pp. 244-255.
Download (309kB) | Preview
Reduction of support measures affecting soybean oil in the major soybean producing countries, as a consequence of WTO rules, coupled with rising demand for palm oil in non-traditional palm oil importing countries may lead to pronounced increases in agricultural land demand for oil palm expansion in Malaysia and Indonesia – two main palm oil producing and exporting countries. However, it is expected that the effects on agricultural land demand and consequently impact upon the environment will depend much on existing governance affecting environmental and forestry management in the two countries. Given the relatively more prevalent policy and institutional failures in Indonesia, it is anticipated that deforestation consequences and open burnings in the country will be stronger, inevitably giving rise to recurring haze externalities in the region. This study employed single and multi-country output supply exogenous policy models with explicit factor markets to examine agricultural land demand-trade linkages in the world vegetable oil markets. Shifts in export demand for palm oil and reductions of support measures affecting soybean production were simulated and effects on land use in Malaysia and Indonesia were observed under varying assumptions of environmental and forestry policy regimes in the two countries. Inferences on environmental effects are also provided.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Linking Agricultural Trade, Land Demand and Environmental Externalities: Case of Oil Palm in South East Asia|
|Keywords:||Agricultural trade and environment; Oil palm economy in Malaysia and Indonesia; Oil palm expansion and haze; Transboundary pollution; Policy failures and environmental impacts|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q17 - Agriculture in International Trade
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development
|Depositing User:||Jamal Othman|
|Date Deposited:||10. Apr 2010 23:58|
|Last Modified:||04. Jan 2016 01:36|
Aditjondro, G.J. “The Driving Force of Indonesia’s Catastrophic Forest Fires”. <http://forests.org/archive/indomalay/drforind. htm>. (2000)
Asian Development Bank. Fire, Smoke, and Haze. The ASEAN Response Strategy. Manila: ASIAN Development Bank, 2001.
Barbier, E.B., N. Bockstael, J.C. Burgess, and I. Strand. “The Linkages Between Timber Trade and Tropical Deforestation – Indonesia”. World Economy 18, no. 3 (1995).
Barlow, C. “Palm Oil Policies and Intervention”. In Globalisation and its Impact on the Palm Oil Industry, edited by E. Pushparajah and Chee K.H. Proceedings of an International Planters Conference, 16-18 June, 2003.
Casson, Anne. The Hesitant Boom: Indonesia’s Oil Palm Sector in an Era of Economic Crisis and Political Change. Program on the Underlying Causes of Deforestation, Bogor Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research, 1999.
Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia, 1980-2003. Jakarta.
Gardiner, W.H., V.O. Roningen, and K, Liu. Elasticities in the Trade Liberalization Database. Econ. Res. Service. USDA, 1989.
Gunter, L., Jeong, K., and F.W. White. “Multi-Policy Goals in a Trade Model with Explicit Factor Markets”. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. (May 1996): 313-30.
Hertel. T.W. “Negotiating Reductions in Agricultural Support: Implications of Technology and Factor Mobility”. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. (August 1989): 559-73.
Jamal Othman. A Comparative Static, Game Theoretic Trade Model with Explicit Cross-Country Policy Linkages. Ph.D Dissertation, Department. of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, 1994.
________. “Linking Factor Markets, Environment and Trade: The Case of Oil Palm in Malaysia”. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 31, (1997): 53-69.
________, Mohd Fauzi Mohd Jani, and Mohammad Haji Alias. “World Palm Oil Market Under Freer Trade: Implications for Malaysia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin. Vol. 15. No. 2 (1998):168-83.
________. “Linking Exchange Rates, Market Failures and Agricultural Land Demand”. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 34, (2000): 21-37.
Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) and Ministry of Primary Industries. Malaysian Palm Oil Statistics, 2001. Bangi, Selangor. 2002.
Oil World. Annual 2002, Hamburg: ISTA Mielke GmbH, 2002.
Shawahid H.O. and Jamal Othman. “Malaysia”. In Indonesia’s Fires and Haze: The Cost of Catatrophe, edited by David Glover and Timothy Jessup, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, and Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1999.
Tampubolon, S.M.H. 1998. “Land–Use Planning and Management To Reduce the Impacts of Transboundary Pollution from Fires in South East Asia: Key Policy and Resource Management Stakeholders Perceptions”. Center for Development Studies, Institute for Research, Bogor University of Agriculture. <http://www.icsea.or.id/sea-span/scipol2/STUDY123.htm>.
World Rainforest Movement. The Bitter Fruit of Oil Palm. Montevideo: World Rainforest Movement, 2001.