ISEG Undergraduate Students: Determinants of Academic Performance

LEÃO FERNANDES, GRAÇA and CHAGAS LOPES, MARGARIDA (2008): ISEG Undergraduate Students: Determinants of Academic Performance.

Abstract

Abstract Over the last three decades there have been in Portugal a quite huge public investment in the school system and the implementation of an effective compulsory education. These changes came along with the democratization of school experience. Moreover the increase in the number of students in higher education is a national goal that have been pursued by education policy. Families, with fewer children, the perception of higher studies as a way to move up in the social ladder and better life conditions have an active behaviour on behalf of their children education. However, in spite of all the government and parents investment in children education, school failure is a major problem that affects all levels of education. At university level school failure affects mainly undergraduate students in their first year of studies1. This problem is a major concern for those involved in higher education political definition and this is why it becomes a research field of much interest. This paper intends to shed some light on the determinants of academic performance of undergraduate students of the School of Economics and Management in their first year of studies. Following Dollado and Morales (2007) we will measure success in academic performance using the exam´s marks in three 1st year subjects with decreasing degrees of mathematical complexity, Maths, Economy 1 and Management and Economic History. In this paper we go further than Dollado and Morales (2007) since, besides type of school, specialization track at high school and marks obtained at the university entry-exam, we study the role of individual characteristics, family socio-economic background and pre-university school trajectory on the academic performance. We put an emphasis on the effect of transitions from public\private or private\public schools and from in-home to out-home.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Success/failure in Graduation; Examination Marks; 1st. Year Critical Subjects; Family's Social & Economic Background; Previous Schooling; Portugal
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics

References

References (Including own Publications)

Ammermueller et al. (2003), Schooling Quality in Eastern Europe: Educational Production During Transition, IZA DP nº 746, March.

Ballard, C. & Johnson, M. (2005), “Gender, Expectations and Grades in Introductory Microeconomics at a US University”, Feminist Economics, 11(1), March, 95-122.

Blau, D.M.(1999), “The effect of income on child development”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(2), 261-276.

Capellari, L. (2004), High school types, academic performance and early labour market outcomes, IZA Discussion Paper nº1048.

Carver, M. R., Jr.; King, T. E. (1994), “An Empirical Investigation of the MBA Admission Criteria for Nontraditional Programs”, Journal of Education for Business, 70 (2), 94-98 Nov-Dec.

Dollado, J. and Morales, E. (2007), Which Factors Determine Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students in Economics? Some Spanish Evidence, Documento de Trabalho 2007-23, Serie Capital Humano y Empleo, Fedea. 17

Eide and Showalter (1998), “The effect of School Quality on Student Performance: A Quantile Regression Approach”, Economic Letters, Vol.58, pp.345-350.

Ermisch, J. and Francesconi, M. (2001), “Family Matters: Impact of Family Background on Educational Attainment”, Economica, May, 137-156.

Figlio, D.N. and Stone J. (1999), “Are Private Schools Really Better?”, Research in Labor Economics, 115-140.

Gibson, A. and Asthana, S. (1998), “Schools, Pupils and Exam Results: Contextualising School’ Performance”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol.24, pp.269-282.

Hanushek, E. A. (1979), “Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions”, Journal of Human Ressources, 14(3), pp.351-388.

Hassink, Wolter & Kiiver, Hanna, (2007), Age-dependent Effects of Socio-economic Background on Educational Attainment – Evidence from Germany, Tjalling Koopmans Research Institute, Discussion Papers nº 07-26

Haveman, R. and Wolfe, B. (1995), “The Determinants of Children’s Attainment: A Review of Methods and Findings”, Journal of Economic Literature, 33(4), 1829-1878.

Hill, C.R. & Stafford, F.P. (1980), “Parental Care of Children Time Diary Estimates of Quantity, Predictability and Variety”, Journal of Human Research 15(2), 219-239.

Kalb, G. and Maani, S. (2007), The Importance of Observing Early School Leaving and Usually Unobserved Background and Peer Characteristics in Analysing Academic Performance, WP nº 5/2007, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.

Koenker, R. and Basset, G. (1978), “Regression Quantiles”, Econometrica, 46, 33-50. Krueger, A. (1999), “Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions”, Quaterly Journal of Economics 114 (2): 497-532.

Lazear, E. (2001), “Educational Production”, Quaterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 777-803.

Chagas Lopes, M. & Medeiros, J.C.(2004) School failure and intergenerational “human capital” transmission in Portugal, Education On Line collection, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003679.htm

Lorenzo, C. (2004), High School Types, Academic Performance and Early Labour Market Outcomes, IZA DP nº 1048, March.

Ludger, W. (2004), How Equal Are Educational Opportunities? Family Background and Student Achievement in Europe and the United States, IZA DP nº1284, September.

Maani, S. and Kalb, G. (2007), “Academic Performance, Childhood Economic Resources, and the Choice to Leave School at the Age Sixteen”, Economics of Education Review, 26(2).

Machin, S. & McNally, S. (2005), “Gender and Student Achievment in English Schools”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 357-372.

Miller, P. and Volker, P. (1989), “Socio-economic Influences on Educational Attainment: Evidence and Implications for the Tertiary Education Finance Debate”, Australian Journal of Statistics, 31A, 47-70.

Neal, D. (1997), “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Achievement”, Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), 98-123.

OECD Thematic Review of Tertiary Education – Country Background Report: Portugal, 2006. OECD Education at a Glance (2007), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/15/39245059.xls (Ac. 1/7/2008).

OCES 2004 – O sistema de ensino superior em Portugal 1993-2003 http://www.estatisticas.gpeari.mctes.pt/index.php?id_categoria=47&id_item=95451

Pronzato, C. (2008), Why Educated Mothers Don’t Make Educated Children? A Statistical Study in the Intergenerational Transmission of Schooling, March http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ese:iserwp:2008-11&r=edu

Rothstein, JM (2004), “College Performance Predictions and the SAT”, Journal of Econometrics, 121, 297-317.

Rudd, E. (1984), “A Comparison Between the Results Achieved by Women and Men Studying for First Degrees in British Universities”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol9, pp.47-57.

Smith, J. and Naylor, R. (2001), “Determinants of Degree Performance in U.K. Universities: A Statistical Analysis of the 1993 Student Cohort”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 29-60.

Stinebrickner, R. & Stinebrickner, T. (2003), “Working During School and Academic Performance”, Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2), 473-491

Yang,B. & Lu, D. (2001), “Predicting Academic Performance in Management Education: An empirical Investigation of MBA Success”, Journal of Education for Business, 77(1), 15-20, Sep/Oct