Dronkers, J. and Schijf, H (2001): From public offices to the cultural or economic sector. How Dutch nobility kept its elite positions during the 20th century.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_22151.pdf Download (160kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Dutch noble families have held more elite positions than high bourgeois families during the 20th century, and this relative advantage hardly changed over several generations. In this paper we test on of the possible explanations of this ‘constant noble advantage hypothesis’, using a sample of members of noble and high bourgeois families born in the 20th century. We assume that Dutch nobility made a strategic shift from the public sector (diplomacy, local government) towards to the private sector (financial or service sector). The analyses confirm a move by the successive generations of Dutch nobility away from public elite positions towards more elite positions in the cultural and business sector. Although this move into elite position in other sectors does not fully compensate for the decline of elite positions in the public sector, it highlights an important part of the explanation of the ‘constant noble advantage’. Dutch high bourgeoisie did not made this move outside the public sector during the same period.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | From public offices to the cultural or economic sector. How Dutch nobility kept its elite positions during the 20th century. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | nobility; elite; cultural and business sector; constant noble advantage |
Subjects: | N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy > N34 - Europe: 1913- Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification |
Item ID: | 22151 |
Depositing User: | Jaap Dronkers |
Date Deposited: | 20 Apr 2010 10:12 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 04:53 |
References: | Bruin, K. & Schmidt, K. (1980). “Zur Genealogie der Genealogie. Over het boekstaven van ‘aanzienlijkheid’ in het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden [On the registration of Dutch High Society], Sociologische Gids, 26, 274-292. Bruin, K. (1981). “Kwesties of Stand. Over de opname in de adelstand van Amsterdamse patriciërs in de 19de eeuw” [Matters of Status, the raising of Patricians in nineteenth century Amsterdam], Sociologische Gids, 27, 110-140. Bruin, K. (1992). “Adelsbeleid in Nederland. Notities bij recente ontwikkelingen” [Nobility policy in the Netherlands. Notes on current developments], Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift, 18, 119-133. Conze, E. (2000) Von Deutschem Adel. Die Grafen von Bernstorff im 20. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart/München: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Dronkers, J. (2005) “Afnemende adellijke homogamie binnen de Duits-Oostenrijkse adel in de twintigste eeuw? Een vergelijking met de Nederlandse adel” [Declining noble homogamy within the Austrian-German nobility? A comparison with the Dutch nobility] Virtus. Jaarboek voor adelsgeschiedenis 12: 121-139. Dronkers, J. & Hillege, S.M.M. (1998). “Board Membership of Traditional Male Fraternities and Access to Dutch Elites: A Disappearing Avenue to Elite Positions?,” European Sociological Review, 14, 191-204. Dronkers, J. (2003). "Has the Dutch Nobility retained its Social Relevance during the 20th Century?" European Sociological Review 19:81-96. Dronkers, J. & Schijf, H. (2004a). "Huwelijken tussen adel en patriciaat: een middel om hun elitepositie in een moderne samenleving in stand te houden?” [Marriage between the nobility and high bourgeoisie as a means of maintaining their elite position in modern Dutch society] De Nederlandsche Leeuw 122:144-155. Dronkers, J. & Schijf, H. (2004b). “The transmission of elite positions among the Dutch nobility during the 20thth Century,” in: E. Conze & Wienfort, M. (eds.), Adel und Moderne. Deutschland im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert im europäischen Vergleich, Wien/Köln: Böhlau Verlag, pp. 65-86. Hartmann, M. & Kopp, J. (2001) “Elitenselektion durch Bildung oder durch Herkunft? Promotion, soziale Herkunft und der Zugang zu Führungspositionen in der deutschen Wirtschaft”. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 53, 436-466. Israel, J. (1995). The Dutch Republic. Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477-1806. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kuiper, Y. (1993). Adel in Friesland 1780-1888 [Nobility in Friesland]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff/Egbert Forsten. Kuiper, Y. (2000). “Van heerlijkheid naar familiestichting. De van Wassenaers (van Catwijck) in de 19e en 20e eeuw” [From manor to family foundation. The van Wassenaers in the 19th and 20th century]. In Heren van Stand. Van Wassenaer. Achthonderd jaar Nederlandse adelsgeschiedenis (pp. 202-245) Zoetermeer: Stichting Hollandse Historische Reeks. Lieven, D. (1992). The Aristocracy in Europe 1815-1914. Houndsmills: Macmillan. Saint Martin, M. de (1993). L'Espace de la noblesse. Paris: Éditions Métaillé. Schama, S. (1977). Patriots and Liberators. Revolution in the Netherlands 1780-1813. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Schijf, H., Dronkers, J. & Van den Broeke-George, J. (2004). "The transmission of elite positions within Dutch noble and high bourgeoisie families during the 20th century", Social Science Information, 43 (3), 435-476. Schmidt, C. (1986). Om de eer van de familie. Het geslacht Teding van Berkhout 1500-1950; een sociologische benadering. [The honour of the family. The family Teding van Berkhout 1500-1950; a sociological approach]. Amsterdam: Bataafse Leeuw. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/22151 |