Burnecki, Krzysztof and Misiorek, Adam and Weron, Rafal (2010): Loss Distributions.
Download (272kB) | Preview
This paper is intended as a guide to statistical inference for loss distributions. There are three basic approaches to deriving the loss distribution in an insurance risk model: empirical, analytical, and moment based. The empirical method is based on a sufficiently smooth and accurate estimate of the cumulative distribution function (cdf) and can be used only when large data sets are available. The analytical approach is probably the most often used in practice and certainly the most frequently adopted in the actuarial literature. It reduces to finding a suitable analytical expression which fits the observed data well and which is easy to handle. In some applications the exact shape of the loss distribution is not required. We may then use the moment based approach, which consists of estimating only the lowest characteristics (moments) of the distribution, like the mean and variance.
Having a large collection of distributions to choose from, we need to narrow our selection to a single model and a unique parameter estimate. The type of the objective loss distribution can be easily selected by comparing the shapes of the empirical and theoretical mean excess functions. Goodness-of-fit can be verified by plotting the corresponding limited expected value functions. Finally, the hypothesis that the modeled random event is governed by a certain loss distribution can be statistically tested.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Loss Distributions|
|Keywords:||Loss distribution; Insurance risk model; Random variable generation; Goodness-of-fit testing; Mean excess function; Limited expected value function|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G22 - Insurance ; Insurance Companies ; Actuarial Studies
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C46 - Specific Distributions ; Specific Statistics
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
|Depositing User:||Rafal Weron|
|Date Deposited:||20. Apr 2010 10:14|
|Last Modified:||03. Apr 2015 19:13|
Bratley, P., Fox, B. L., and Schrage, L. E. (1987). A Guide to Simulation, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Burnecki, K., Haerdle, W., and Weron, R. (2004). Simulation of risk processes, in J. Teugels, B. Sundt (eds.) Encyclopedia of Actuarial Science, Wiley, Chichester.
Burnecki, K., Kukla, G., and Weron, R. (2000). Property insurance loss distributions, Physica A 287: 269-278.
Burnecki, K. and Weron, R. (2008). Visualization Tools for Insurance Risk Processes, in Ch. Chen, W. Haerdle, A. Unwin (eds.) Handbook of Data Visualization, Springer, Berlin, 899-920.
Chernobai, A., Burnecki, K., Rachev, S.T., Trueck, S., and Weron, R. (2006). Modelling catastrophe claims with left-truncated severity distributions, Computational Statistics 21: 537-555.
Cizek, P., Haerdle, W., and Weron, R., eds. (2005). Statistical Tools for Finance and Insurance, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
D'Agostino, R. B. and Stephens, M. A. (1986). Goodness-of-Fit Techniques, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Daykin, C.D., Pentikainen, T., and Pesonen, M. (1994). Practical Risk Theory for Actuaries, Chapman, London.
Devroye, L. (1986). Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Embrechts, P., Kluppelberg, C., and Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance, Springer.
Hogg, R. and Klugman, S. A. (1984). Loss Distributions, Wiley, New York.
Johnk, M. D. (1964). Erzeugung von Betaverteilten und Gammaverteilten Zufallszahlen, Metrika 8: 5-15.
Klugman, S. A., Panjer, H.H., and Willmot, G.E. (1998). Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, Wiley, New York.
L'Ecuyer, P. (2004). Random Number Generation, in J. E. Gentle, W. H¨ardle, Y. Mori (eds.) Handbook of Computational Statistics, Springer, Berlin, 35–70.
Panjer, H.H. and Willmot, G.E. (1992). Insurance Risk Models, Society of Actuaries, Chicago.
Ross, S. (2002). Simulation, Academic Press, San Diego.
Stephens, M. A. (1978). On the half-sample method for goodness-of-fit, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 40: 64-70.
Weron, R. (2004). Computationally Intensive Value at Risk Calculations, in J. E. Gentle, W. Haerdle, Y. Mori (eds.) Handbook of Computational Statistics, Springer, Berlin, 911–950.