Infant Industry Protection and Industrial Dynamics

Ederington, Josh and McCalman, Phillip (2009): Infant Industry Protection and Industrial Dynamics.

Abstract

A perennial case for industrial policy is based on the protection of young or emerging industries. Despite a natural association with concepts of life cycles, industrial policy has not been analyzed in the context of an industry life-cycle model. In particular, an important life-cycle characteristic, the potential for very large changes in the rate of net entry, is ignored. In this paper, we demonstrate how the impact of industrial policy depends critically on the entry and exit dynamics within an industry. In particular, we construct a model of technology adoption in which the number of firms is endogenous, and derive a set of novel predictions about the effects of protection on firm technology decisions. Specifically, we show that permanent protection can induce earlier adoption, but also decreases the probability that a given firm adopts the new technology. Likewise, we demonstrate that reducing the duration of protection results in faster adoption than permanent protection, but also reduces a given firms probability of adoption. Finally, we show that, for industries characterized by flexibility in firm numbers, protection does not change the rate of technology adoption but does increase the size and probability of a shakeout (large scale net exit).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: GATT/WTO; Trade Policy; Trade and Firm Productivity
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade

References

Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. (1992). The sensitivity of strategic and corrective r&d policy in battles for monopoly. International Economic Review, 33, 795-816

Bernard, A., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., and Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review, 93, 1268-1291

Crowley, M. A. (2006). Do safeguard tariffs and antidumping duties open or close technology gaps?. Journal of International Economics, 68, 469-484

Ederington, J. and McCalman, P. (2007). The impact of trade liberalization on productivity within and across industries: theory and evidence. manuscript.

Ederington, J. and McCalman, P. (2008). Endogenous rm heterogeneity and the dynamics of trade liberalization. Journal of International Economics, 74, 422-440.

Ederington, J. and McCalman, P. (2009). International trade and industrial dynamics. International Economic Review, 50, 961-989.

Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1985). Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Review of Economic Studies, 52, 383-401.

Gotz, G. (1999). Monopolistic competition and the diffusion of new technology. Rand Journal of Economics, 30, 679-693.

Gort, M. and Klepper, S. (1982). Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal, 92, 630-653

Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70, 950-959

Matsuyama, K. (1990). Perfect equilibria in a trade liberalization game. American Economic Review, 80, 480-492.

Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725

Melitz, M. J. and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2008). Market size, trade, and productivity. Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 295-316.

Miyagiwa, K. and Ohno, Y. (1995). Closing the technology gap under protection. American Economic Review, 85, 755-770

Miyagiwa, K. and Ohno, Y. (1999). Credibility of protection and incentives to innovate. International Economic Review, 40, 143-163.

Reinganum, J. (1981). On the diffusion of new technology: a game theoretic approach. Review of Economic Studies, 48, 395-405

Rodrik, D. (1992). Closing technology gaps: does trade liberalization really help?. In Helleiner, G. (Ed.), Trade Policy, Industrialization and Development: New Perspectives. Claredon Press

Saggi, K. and Lin, P. (1999). Incentives for foreign direct investment under imitation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32, 1275-98.

Saggi, K. and Pack, H. (2006). Is there a case for industrial policy? a critical survey. World Bank Research Observer, 21(2), 267-297.