Pek, Chuen Khee and Othman, Jamal (2010): Household Demand for Solid Waste Disposal Options in Malaysia.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_23143.pdf Download (101kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper estimates the economic values of household preference for enhanced solid waste disposal services in Malaysia. The contingent valuation (CV) method estimates an average additional monthly willingness-to-pay (WTP) in solid waste management charges of €0.77 to 0.80 for improved waste disposal services quality. The finding of a slightly higher WTP from the generic CV question than that of label-specific, further reveals a higher WTP for sanitary landfill, at €0.90, than incineration, at €0.63. This suggests that sanitary landfill is a more preferred alternative. The logistic regression estimation procedure reveals that household’s concern of where their rubbish is disposed, age, ownership of house, household income and format of CV question are significant factors in influencing WTP.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Household Demand for Solid Waste Disposal Options in Malaysia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | contingent valuation, logistic regression, solid waste disposal, willingness-to-pay. |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects |
Item ID: | 23143 |
Depositing User: | Chuen-Khee Pek |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jun 2010 21:45 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:24 |
References: | [1] C. Sellar, J. R. Stoll, and J. P. Chavas, “Validation of empirical measures of welfare changes: A comparison of nonmarket techniques,” Land Economics, vol. 61, pp. 15–64, 1985. [2] J. C. Bergstrom, and J. R. Stoll, “Application of experimental economics concepts and precepts to CVM field survey procedures,” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 14, pp. 98-109, 1989. [3] P. Diamond, and J. Hausman, “Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, pp. 45-64, 1994. [4] S. –H. Yoo, and S. –Y. Kwak, “Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study,” Energy Policy, vol. 37, pp. 5408-5416, 2009. [5] O, Jamal, Household preferences for solid waste management in Malaysia. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia Research Report, No. 2002-RR8, Singapore, 2002. [6] O. Jamal, “Economic valuation of household preference for solid waste management in Malaysia: A choice modeling approach,” International Journal of Management Studies, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2006. [7] O. Jamal, J. Bennet, and R. Blamey, “Environmental values and resource management options: a choice modeling experience in Malaysia,” Environment and Development Economics, vol. 9, pp. 803-824, 2004. [8] J. A. List, and C. A. Gallet, “What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Evidence from a meta-analysis,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 20, pp. 241-254, 2001. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/23143 |