Böhme, Enrico and Müller, Christopher (2010): Comparing Monopoly and Duopoly on a Two-Sided Market without Product Differentiation.
![Warning](/style/images/warning.png)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_23568.pdf Download (262kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We propose both a monopoly and a duopoly model of a two-sided market. Both settings are fully comparable, as we impose a homogeneous good produced at zero costs without capacity constraints, as well as identical parameterization of market sizes. We determine the duopoly equilibrium and the monopoly optimum in terms of the parameters and obtain solutions with and without subsidization (prices below marginal cost) of one market side. We show that there exists a continuum of economically plausible parameter sets for which duopoly equilibrium prices exceed optimal monopoly prices and one with no observable price effect of competition, i.e. one where optimum and equilibrium prices become equal. Despite the fact that virtually everything except for the number of platform operators is identical in the latter situations, total demand on both market sides in the duopoly market exceeds total demand in the monopoly market. Furthermore, even though there is no observable price effect, there is still a competitive effect in so far that total profits in the duopoly equilibrium are strictly smaller than monopoly profits. The relationship of total welfare is ambiguous in subsidization cases, while it is strictly greater in duopoly, if no subsidization takes place. Our results sharply contradict economic intuition and common economic knowledge from one-sided markets.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Comparing Monopoly and Duopoly on a Two-Sided Market without Product Differentiation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | two-sided markets, platform competition, price-concentration relationship, welfare analysis |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K20 - General L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L12 - Monopoly ; Monopolization Strategies |
Item ID: | 23568 |
Depositing User: | Christopher Mueller |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jun 2010 01:40 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:51 |
References: | Anderson, S. P., & Gabszewicz, J. J. (2006). The media and advertising: a tale of two-sided markets. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture. North-Holland: Elsevier. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691. Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309-328. Chaudhri, V. (1998). Pricing and efficiency of a circulation industry: The case of newspapers. Information Economics and Policy, 10(1), 59-76. Danaher, P. J. (1995). What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? Journal of Advertising Research, 37(1), 37-47. Dewenter, R. (2006). Das Konzept der zweiseitigen Märkte am Beispiel von Zeitungsmonopolen. Hamburg: Department of Economics, Helmut-Schmidt-University of the Federal Armed Forces. Gabszewicz, J. J., Laussel, D., & Sonnac, N. (1999). TV-broadcasting competition and advertising: Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique, Université Catholique de Louvain. Häckner, J., & Nyberg, S. (2008). Advertising and media market concentration. Journal of Media Economics, 21(2), 79-96. Kaiser, U., & Song, M. (2009). Do media consumers really dislike advertising? An empirical assessment of the role of advertising in print media markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(2), 292-301. Nilssen, T., & Sørgard, L. (2001). The TV industry: advertising and programming. Oslo: Department of Economics, University of Oslo. Picard, R. G. (1989). Media economics. Concepts and issues. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage. Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. Rysman, M. (2004). Competition between networks: a study of the market for yellow pages. Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 483-512. Weyl, E. G. (2006). The price theory of two-sided markets. Princeton: Bendheim Center for Finance, Department of Economics, Princeton University. Wilbur, K. C. (2007). A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/23568 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Comparing Monopoly and Duopoly on a Two-Sided Market without Product Differentiation. (deposited 30 Jun 2010 01:40) [Currently Displayed]