van der Hoek, M. Peter (2008): Local public procurement: how to deal with a creative bidder? A case study from the Netherlands. Published in: Journal of Public Procurement , Vol. 10, No. 1 : pp. 121-135.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_24280.pdf Download (112kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the procurement of transportation services for the disabled by the town of Ridderkerk. The method used consisted of a study of the town’s files and interviews with 11 persons involved. The tender specifications were peculiar in that they required bidders to submit a schedule with prices per ride for seven classes ranging from 100,000 to over 600,000, whereas the real number of rides amounted to 270,000. One of the bidders quoted high prices for the first classes and very low prices for the last classes. On the basis of all seven classes, he quoted the lowest costs and won the contract. However, on the basis of the real number of rides he was the second most expensive bidder.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Local public procurement: how to deal with a creative bidder? A case study from the Netherlands |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Public procurement; local government; Netherlands; transportation services for disabled |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H76 - State and Local Government: Other Expenditure Categories |
Item ID: | 24280 |
Depositing User: | M. Peter van der Hoek |
Date Deposited: | 12 Aug 2010 09:12 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 19:40 |
References: | Alexandersson, G. & Hultén, S. (2006). “Predatory Bidding in Competitive Tenders: A Swedish Case Study.” European Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (1): 73-94. Alexandersson, G. & Hultén, S. (2007). “High and Low Bids in Tenders: Strategic Pricing and Other Bidding Behaviour in Public Tenders of Passenger Railway Services.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78 (2): 161-194. Duncombe, W.D. & Searcy, C. (2007). “Can the Use of Recommended Procurement Practices Save Money?” Public Budgeting & Finance, 27 (2): 68-87. European Commission (2006). “Commission Interpretative Communication on the Community Law Applicable to Contract Awards Not or Not Fully Subject to the Provisions of the Public Procurement Directives.” [Online]. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:179:0002:0007:EN:PDF. Lundberg, S. (2005). “Restrictions on Competition in Municipal Competitive Procurement in Sweden.” International Advances in Economic Research, 11 (3): 329-342. Mardas, D. & Triantafyllou, D. (2001). “Selection Criteria and the Award Procedure in Public Procurement.” International Advances in Economic Research, 3 (1): 91-112. Martin, S., Hartley, K. & Cox, A. (1999). “Public Procurement Directives in the European Union: A Study of Local Authority Purchasing.” Public Administration, 77 (2): 387-406. Obermann, G. and Kostal, T. (2003). “Public Procurement at the Local Level in Austria: The Economic Consequences of Compulsory Competitive Tendering for Public Services.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 74 (1): 139-62. Vincent-Jones, P. (1999). “Competition and Contracting in the Transition from CCT to Best Value: Towards a More Reflexive Regulation?” Public Administration, 77 (2): 273-291. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/24280 |