El conflicto colombo-venezolano y la construcción de escenarios desde la Teoría de Juegos.

Arroyo, Santiago and Alegría, Alexander (2009): El conflicto colombo-venezolano y la construcción de escenarios desde la Teoría de Juegos. Published in: Convergencia Revista de Ciecnias Sociales , Vol. 52, No. 1405-1435 (30 April 2010): pp. 97-124.

Abstract

During the last 10 years, diplomatic relation between Colombia and Venezuela has been marked by a constant instability. Such a relation has had two hard moments: between December 2004 and February 2005 with Granda case, and in March 2008 with the dead of Raul Reyes. This paper shows an alternative analysis of agreements between both nations, emphasizing particularly the Granda case. The analysis is based on a dynamic game, through which it will be very important the effect on the economy of each country has the freezing of trade relation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The Colombo-Venezuelan conflict and the construction of scenes from Theory of Games.
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Teoría de juegos - intervención pública - implicaciones diplomáticas - acuerdos bilaterales.
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games

References

Bhattacharya, Sukanto et al. (2004), “The Israel-Palestine Question – A Case for Application of Neutrosophic Game Theory”, en Game Theory and Information,EconWPA. Disponible en: http://129.3.20.41/eps/game/papers/0411/0411007.pdf

Brams, Steven (1994), Theory of moves, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbons, Robert (1996), “An Introduction to Applicable Game Theory”, en NBR Technical Working, Paper núm. T0199, University of Pennsylvania.

Keohane, Robert y Joseph Nye (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, en Boston: Publisher Little, Brown and Co.

Khun, Harold (1962), “Games Theory and Models of Negotiation”, en The Journal of conflict resolution, vol. 6, núm. 1, New York.

Shakun, Melvin (2003), “United States China Plane Collision Negotiation”,en Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 12, núm. 6, New York.

Smith, Peter (1996), Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of U.S. Latin American Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stone, Randall (2001), “The Use and Abuse of Game Theory in International Relations: the theory of moves”, en The Journal of Conflict Resolution,vol. 45, núm. 2.

Tokatlian, Juan y Rodrigo Pardo (1987), “Relaciones Exteriores y Política Interna”, en Política Exterior Colombiana, Bogotá: Tercer Mundo.

Wade, Jared (2004), “How You Play the Game”, en Risk Management, vol. 51, núm. 4, New York.

Waltz, K. (1975), “Theory of International Relations”, en Greenstein, Fred y Nelson Polsby [eds.], International Politics, Handbook of Political Science,Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Zagare, Frank (1992), “nato, Rational Escalation and Flexible Response”, en Journal of Peace Research, vol. 29, núm. 4.

Zeager, Lester y Johnathan Bascom (1996), “Strategic Behavior in Refugee Repatriation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis”, en The Journal of Conflict Resolution,vol. 40, núm. 3.