Smerilli, Alessandra (2010): We-thinking and vacillation between frames: filling a gap in Bacharach's theory.
Download (639kB) | Preview
The idea of team-thinking or we-thinking is increasingly drawing the attention of economists. The main claim of scholars who analyze we-thinking is that it is a coherent mode of reasoning people may use when they face a decision problem. But, if there is a general agreement on the existence of the we-mode of reasoning and on the fact people endorse it, scholars have different opinions about the way in which we-thinking arises and how it brings people to behave in a particular way. Then different authors have proposed different analyses of the issue. In this paper I address the issue by proposing a simple model of vacillation between the I and we-modes of reasoning, as a way in which we-thinking can arise in the face of a decision problem. The model is based on a not fully developed intuition - the double-crossing problem in the PD game - of Bacharach, whose theory is the most developed from an analytical point of view.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||We-thinking and vacillation between frames: filling a gap in Bacharach's theory|
|Keywords:||we-thinking, frames, vacillation, game theory|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C79 - Other
Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z19 - Other
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games
|Depositing User:||alessandra smerilli|
|Date Deposited:||23. Sep 2010 17:53|
|Last Modified:||30. Dec 2015 13:06|
ANDERSON, E. (2001): “Unstrapping the straitjacket of ‘preference’: a comment on Amartya Sen’s contribution to Philosophy and Economics”, Economics and Philosophy, 17, 21-38.
BACHARACH, M. (1993): "Variable Universe Games," in Frontiers of Game Theory, ed. by K. Binmore, A. Kirman, and P. Tani. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
BACHARACH, M. (1995): "Co-Operating without Communicating," London.
BACHARACH, M. (1997): ""We" Equilibria: A Variable Frame Theory of Cooperation," Oxford: Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford, 30.
BACHARACH, M. (1999): "Interactive Team Reasoning: A Contribution to the Theory of Cooperation," Research in Economics, 53, 30.
BACHARACH, M. (2001): "Framing and Cognition in Economics: The Bad News and the Good," ISER Workshop, Cognitive Processes in Economics.
BACHARACH, M. (2006): Beyond Individual Choice. Princeton University Press, Edited by N. GOLD, and R. SUGDEN.
BACHARACH, M., BERNASCONI, M. (1997): “The Variable Frame Theory of Focal Points: An Experimental Study”, in Games and Economic Behavior, 19 (1), 1-45.
BECCHETTI, L., DEGLI ANTONI G., and FAILLO, M. (2009): “Common reason to believe and framing effect in the team reasoning theory: an experimental approach”, Econometica Working Paper series, n.15, November 2009.
BRUNI, L. (2008): Reciprocity, altruism and the civil society. Routledge.
DAVIS, J. (2009): “Two relational conceptions of individuals: teams and neuroeconomics” in A Research Annual, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Metodology series, vol. 27 – A, 1-21.
GAUTHIER, D. (1975): “Coordination”in Dialogue, 14, 195-221.
GILBERT, M. (1989): On Social Facts. Routledge.
GOLD, N., and R. SUGDEN (2008): "Theories of Team Agency," in Rationality and Commitment, ed. by P. Di Fabienne, and S. H.: Oxford University Press.
HODGSON, D. H. (1967): Consequences of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
HOLLIS, M. (1998): Trust within Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HOLLIS, M. and SUGDEN, R. (2003): “Rationality in Action”, Mind, 102 (405), 1-35.
HUME, D. ( 1978): A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HURLEY, S. (1989): Natural Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
REGAN, D. (1980): Utilitarianism and Cooperation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
SALLY, D. (1995): "Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis of Experiment from 1958 to 1992," Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92.
SUGDEN, R. (1993): "Thinking as a Team: Toward an Explanation of Nonselfish Behavior," Social Philosophy and Policy, 10, 69-89.
SUGDEN, R. (2000): "Team Preferences," Economics and Philosophy, 16, 175-204.
SUGDEN, R. (2003): "The Logic of Team Reasoning," Philosophical explorations, 16, 165-181.
SUGDEN, R.(2005): "Fellow-Feeling," in Economics and Social Interactions, ed. by B. Gui, and R. Sugden: Cambridge University Press.
TAN, J., and D. ZIZZO (2008): "Groups, Cooperation and Conflict in Games," The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1-17.
TUOMELA, R. (1995): The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford University Press.
TUOMELA, R. (2007): The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge University Press.
ZIZZO, D., and J. TAN (2003): "Game Harmony as a Predictor of Cooperation in 2 X 2 Games: An Experimental Study," Oxford: Department of Economics, University of Oxford.
ZIZZO, D. (2004): “Positive Harmony Transformations and Equilibirum Selection in Two-Player Games,” Oxford: Department of Economics, University of Oxford.