Defining and measuring polycentric regions: the case of Tuscany

Burgalassi, David (2010): Defining and measuring polycentric regions: the case of Tuscany.

Abstract

Polycentric development in regions has many dimensions, which involve several definitions and measures. This paper tackles the problem of defining and measuring polycentricity under an integrated and multi- dimensional perspective. Firstly, the policy relevance of polycentricity is analysed. Then, the paper identifies the definitions and measures of polycentricity by surveying the literature. It also provides a taxonomy among two main aspects involved in the definition of polycentricity: the morphological dimension and the functional dimension. Based on this background, an empirical analysis is carried out, by using data about population and commuting flows in the Tuscany Region (Italy). The results show that Tuscany can be viewed as a polycentric spatial structure, both considering rank-size distribution of cities and spatial interaction.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Polycentric development; spatial structure; rank-size estimations; spatial interaction; Tuscany
• Subjects: R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R23 - Regional Migration ; Regional Labor Markets ; Population ; Neighborhood Characteristics

References

Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Anas, A., R. Arnott, and K. Small (1998). Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Literature 36, 1426–1464.

Anderson, N. and W. Bogart (2001). Identifying and Characterizing Employment Centers in Polycentric Metropolitan Areas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60 (1), 147–169.

Becattini, G., M. Bellandi, D. Ottati, and F. Sforzi (2003). From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgard Publishing.

Boschma, R. (2005). Social Capital and Regional Development: an Emprirical Analysis of the Third Italy. In R. Boschma and R. Kloosterman (Eds.), Learning From Clusters, pp. 139–168. Soringer Netherlands.

Calafati, A. (2005). On the Use of Local Labour Systems. Italian Journal of Regional Science 4 (1), 139–144.

Camagni, R., M. Gibelli, and P. Rigamonti (2002). Urban Mobility and Urban Form: the Social and Environmental Costs of Different Patterns of Urban Expansion. Ecological Economics 40, 199–216.

Camagni, R. and C. Salone (1993). Network Urban Structures in Northern Italy: Elements for a Theoretical Framework. Urban Studies 30 (6), 1053–1064.

Cavalieri, A. (Ed.) (1999). Toscana e Toscane. Percorsi Locali e Identità Regionale nello Sviluppo Economico. Milan: Franco Angeli.

Commission of the European Union (1999). European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Davoudi, S. (2003). Polycentricity in European Spatial Planning: From an Analytical Tool to a Normative Agenda. European Planning Studies 11 (8), 979–999.

de Dominicis, L., G. Arbia, and H. de Groot (2007). The Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity in Italy. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper no. 094/3, Amsterdam-Rotterdam.

de Goei, B., M. Burger, M. Kitson, and F. van Oort (2008). Poly- centric Urban Configurations and Urban Network Development in the Greater South East UK 1981-2001. Research Bulletin 268, GaWC, Loughborough.

Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf ’s Law and the Growth of Cities. The American Economic Review 89 (2), 129–132.

Gabaix, X. and Y. Ioannides (2004). The Evolution of City Size Distribution. In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4, Chapter 53, pp. 2341–2378. Elsevier.

Glaeser, E. (1998). Are Cities Dying? Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (2), 139–160.

Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman, and A. Schleifer (1992). Growth in Cities. The Journal of Political Economy 100 (6), 1126–1152.

Gordon, P., H. Richardson, and H. Wong (1986). The Distribution of Population and Employment in a polycentric city: the case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning 18 (2), 161–173.

Green, N. (2007). Functional Polycentricity: a Formal Definition in Terms of Social Network Analysis. Urban Studies 44 (11), 2077–2103.

Grubel, H. and P. Lloyd (1975). Intra Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. New York: MacMillian. Defining and Measuring Polycentric Regions. The Case of Tuscany 45

Hall, P. (1993). Forces Shaping Urban Europe. Urban Studies 30, 883–898.

IGEAT (2007). ESPON 1.4.3: Study on Urban Functions. Final Report. Technical report, European Spatial Planning Observation Network.

IRPET (1975). Lo Sviluppo Economico della Toscana. Firenze: Guaraldi. Translated title: ”Economic development in Tuscany”.

Johansson, B. and B. Lambregts (2004). Agglomeration and Networks in Spatial Economies. Papers in Regional Science 83, 165–176.

Kloosterman, R. and B. Lambregts (2001). Clustering of Economic Activities in Polycentric Urban Regions: The Case of the Randstad. Urban Studies 38 (4), 717–732.

Kloosterman, R. and S. Musterd (2001). The Polycentric Urban Region: Towards a Research Agenda. Urban Studies 38 (4), 623–633.

Lambooy, J. (1998). Polynucleation and Economic Develoment: The Randstad. European Planning Studies 6 (4), 457–466.

Limtanakool, N., M. Dijst, and T. Schwanen (2007). A Theoretical Framework and Methodology for Characterising National Urban Systems on the Basis of Flows of People: Empirical Evidence for France and Germany. Urban Studies 44 (11), 2123–2145.

Limtanakool, N., T. Schwanen, and M. Dijst (2009). Developments in the Dutch Urban Systems on the Basis of Flows. Regional Studies 43 (2), 179-196.

Limtanakool, N., T. Schwanen, and M. Martin (2007). Ranking Functional Urban Regions: a Comparison of Interaction and Node Attribute Data. Cities 24 (1), 26–42.

Meijers, E. (2007). Clones or Complements? The Division of Labour between the Main Cities of the Randstad, the Flemish Diamond and the Rhein Ruhr Area. Regional Studies 41 (7), 889–900.

Meijers, E. (2008). Measuring Polycentricity and its Premises. European Planning Studies 16 (9), 1313–1323.

Meijers, E. and K. Sandberg (2006). Polycentric Development to Combat Regional Disparities? the Relation Between Polycentricity and Regional Disparities in European Countries. ERSA conference papers ersa06p287, European Regional Science Association.

Nordregio (2004). ESPON 1.1.1: Potentials for Polycentric Development in Europe. Project Report. Technical report, European Spatial Planning Observation Network.

Parr, J. (2004). The Polycentric Urban Region: A Closer Inspection. Regional Studies 38 (3), 231–240.

Priemus, H. (1994). Planning the Randstad: Between Economic Growth and Sustainability. Urban Studies 31, 509–534.

Regione Toscana (2005). Piano di Indirizzo Territoriale 2005-2010. Technical report.

Rosenthal, S. and W. Strange (2004). Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economies. In V. Henderson and J. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Sohn, J. (2005). Are Commuting Patterns a Good Indicator of Urban Spatial Structure? Journal of Transport Geography 13, 306–317.

Veneri, P. (2010). Urban Polycentricity and the Costs of Commuting: Evidence from Italian Metropolitan Areas, Growth and Change, 41(3), 403-429.