Shroder, Mark (2010): Housing Subsidies and Work Incentives. Forthcoming in: International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_26019.pdf Download (208kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Low-income housing assistance is part of the welfare state of all developed countries. The rest of the welfare state may cause work disincentives. In theory, housing assistance may also do so, but those disincentives may be blunted by its in-kind character and the way it is rationed. Rationing and selection make the estimation difficult; the most rigorous evidence from the United States suggests a loss of 10 to 20 cents in earnings per dollar of assistance. Less rigorous evidence from Australia suggests negative impacts in public housing but not housing benefit, while in Scandinavia researchers have as yet found no long-term duration of dependency.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Housing Subsidies and Work Incentives |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Housing Subsidies, Housing Assistance, Work Disincentives, Rationing, Selection, Comparative International |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R29 - Other |
Item ID: | 26019 |
Depositing User: | Mark Shroder |
Date Deposited: | 23 Oct 2010 14:10 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 19:09 |
References: | Blackorby C and Donaldson D (1988) Cash versus kind, self-selection, and efficient transfers. American Economic Review 78(4): 691–700. Bingley P and Walker I (2001) Housing subsidies and work incentives in Great Britain. The Economic Journal 111(May): C86–C103. Burtless G (1986) The work response to a guaranteed income: A survey of experimental evidence. In: Munnell AH (ed.) Lessons from the Income Maintenance Experiments. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 22-59. Carlson D, Haveman R, Kaplan T, andWolfe B (2008) Long-term effects of public low-income housing vouchers on work, earnings, and neighborhood quality. Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper No. 1338-08. July. Chen J (2006) The dynamics of housing allowance claims in Sweden: A discrete-time hazard analysis. Uppsala University Economics Working Paper No. 2006:1. April. Ditch J, Lewis A, and Wilcox S (2001) Social housing, tenure and housing allowance: An international review. In-House Report 83. UK Department for Work and Pensions. Finkel M and Buron L (2001) Study on section 8 voucher success rates, volume I: Quantitative study of success rates in metropolitan areas. Abt Associates. November. Hulse K and Randolph B (2005) Workforce disincentive effects of housing allowances and public housing for low income households in Australia. European Journal of Housing Policy, 5(2): 147–165. Jacob B and Ludwig J (2008) The effects of housing assistance on labor supply: Evidence from a voucher lottery. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14570. December. Mills G, Gubits D, Orr L, et al. (2006) Effects of housing vouchers on welfare families. September. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Murray MP (1980) A reinterpretation of the traditional income-leisure model, with application to in-kind subsidy programs. Journal of Public Economics 14: 69–81. Nordvik V and Ahren P (2005) The duration of housing allowance claims and labor market incentives: The Norwegian case. European Journal of Housing Policy 5(2): 131–146. Okun AM (1975) Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007) Benefits and Wages: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD. Orr L, Feins JD, and Jacob R, et al. (2003) Moving to Opportunity Interim Impacts Evaluation. September. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development & Research. Shroder M (2002) Does housing assistance perversely affect self-sufficiency? A review essay. Journal of Housing Economics, 11: 381–417. Whelan S (2004) An analysis of the determinants of the labor market activities of housing assistance recipients. AHURI Final Report No.70. October. Melbourne, VIC. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, University of Sydney. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/26019 |