Dronkers, Jaap and Vink, maarten (2010): Explaining immigrant citizenship status. First and second generation immigrants in fifteen European states.
Download (282kB) | Preview
Citizenship acquisition is often seen as a crucial step in the process of integrating immigrants in host societies. This paper analyzes the question why some immigrants are more likely to have acquired destination country citizenship across European states than others and tests legal-formal, socioeconomic, cultural and micro-level explanations. We use a pooled dataset of first and second generation immigrants resident in 15 European states and apply a logistic multilevel analysis to measure country of origin effects, destination country effects, as well as the effects of individual level characteristics. Our analysis shows that second generation and first generation immigrants who arrived more than 20 years ago, immigrants with one parent born in the destination country, retired workers and persons speaking the host country language at home, are more likely to become a citizen of their country of residence. Second generation Muslim immigrants are less likely to have host country citizenship than comparable non-Muslim immigrants of the second generation. Immigrants from former colonies or from poor or political instable countries are more likely to become a citizen of their country of residence. Immigrants are also more likely to have acquired citizenship in destination countries with a low net migration rate and with citizenship laws that make citizenship accessible in comparative perspective.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Explaining immigrant citizenship status. First and second generation immigrants in fifteen European states|
|Keywords:||immigration; citizenship; european union; destination; origin|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F22 - International Migration
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration
|Depositing User:||Jaap Dronkers|
|Date Deposited:||27. Oct 2010 14:40|
|Last Modified:||23. Feb 2015 17:34|
Alvarez, R. 1987 "A Profile of the Citizenship Process among Hispanics in the United States." International Migration Review 21(2):327-351.
Bernard, W. S. 1936 "Cultural Determinants of Naturalization." American Sociological Review. Pp. 943-953.
Bevelander, P., & Veenman, J. (2006) “Naturalisation and Socioeconomic Integration: The Case of the Netherlands. IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 2153.
Bloemraad, I. 2002 “The North American Naturalization Gap: An Institutional Approach to Citizenship Acquisition in the United States and Canada.” International Migration Review 36(1):193-228.
Brubaker, R. 1992 Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clarke, J., E. van Dam and L. Gooster 1998 "New Europeans: Naturalisation and Citizenship in Europe." Citizenship Studies 2(1):43-67.
DeSipio, L. 1987 “Social Science Literature and the Naturalization Process.” International Migration Review 21(2):390-405.
Devoretz, D. J. 2008 “The Economics of Citizenship: A Common Intellectual Ground for Social Scientists?' Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34(4):679-693.
Evans, M. D. R. 1988 "Choosing to be a Citizen: The Time-Path of Citizenship in Australia." International Migration Review 22(2):243-264.
Fleischmann, F. and J. Dronkers 2007. The Effects of Social and Labour Market Policies of EU-countries on the Socio-Economic Integration of First and Second Generation Immigrants from Different Countries of Origin. Working paper EUI-RSCAS 2007/19 (European Forum Series): http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/6849.
Janoski, T. 2010 The Ironies of Citizenship: Naturalization and Integration in Industrialized Countries. Cambridge etc: Cambridge University Press.
Jasso, G. and M. Rosenzweig 1986 “Family Reunification and the Immigration Multiplier: U.S. Immigration Law, Origin-Country Conditions, and the Reproduction of Immigrants.” Demography 23(3): 291-311.
Jones-Correa, M. 2001 “Under Two Flags: Dual Nationality in Latin America and Its Consequences for Naturalization in the United States.” International Migration Review 35(4):997-1029.
Kossert, A. 2008 Kalte Heimat. Die Geschichte der Deutschen Vertriebenen nach 1945. München: Siedler.
Ministerie van Justitie 2001 “Landenlijst naturalisatie oktober 2001. Tussentijds Berichten Nationaliteiten (TBN 2001/5).” Staatscourant 18 september 2001, nr. 180, p. 20.
North, D. S. 1985 “The Long Grey Welcome: A Study of the American Naturalization Process.” International Migration Review 21(2) 311-326.
Portes, A. and J. W. Curtis 1987 "Changing Flags: Naturalization and Its Determinants among Mexican Immigrants." International Migration Review 21(2):352-371.
Portes, A. and M. Zhou (1993) “The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants among post-1965 immigrant youth.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1) 74-98.
Steinhardt, M. F. (2008). “Does Citizenship Matter? The Economic Impact of Naturalizations in Germany. Centro Studi Luca D’Agliano Development Studies Working Papers No. 266.
Thomson, M. and M. Crul (2007) “The Second Generation in Europe and the United States: How is the Transatlantic Debate Relevant for Further Research on the European Second Generation?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(7) 1025-1041
Van Tubergen, F., I. Maas, and H.D. Flap 2004 “The Economic Incorporation of Immigrants in 18 Western Societies: Origin, Destination and Community Effects.” American Sociological Review 69(5):704-727.
Vink, M.P. and G.R. de Groot 2010 “Citizenship Attribution in Western Europe: International Framework and Domestic Trends. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5) 713-734.
Yang, P. Q. 1994 "Explaining Immigrant Naturalization." International Migration Review 28(3):449-477.