Ch'ng, Kean Siang (2010): Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_26638.pdf Download (283kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates the potential of an individual tradable permit system in an experimental two-sided repeated double auction market to overcome over-consumption through road demand management. The evaluation of this system shows that traders exhibit strong dependence on reservation price and there are significant transfers of permit from low value users to high value users. During peak hours, the permit price increases owing to high demand, so the cost of using the road is high during congestion. This creates incentive for low value drivers to postpone their trips and resell permits in the peak hours to gain profit. The results show the delayer pays principle, in which drivers who value highly have to pay drivers who are willing to stay off the road during peak hours.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | : Individual tradable permit, Congestion, High value and low value drivers, Allocative efficiency |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R41 - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion ; Travel Time ; Safety and Accidents ; Transportation Noise C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior |
Item ID: | 26638 |
Depositing User: | Kean Siang Ch'ng |
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2010 15:00 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 12:38 |
References: | Arnott, R., de Palma, A. and Lindsey, R. (1994). The welfare effects of congestion tolls with heterogeneous commuters. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 28:139–161. Cason, T. N. and Friedman, D. (1996). Price formation in double auction markets. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 20:1307–1337. Evan, A. (1992). Road congestion pricing: when is it a good policy? Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy, 26(3):213–244. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2):171–178. Friedman, D. (1984). On the efficiency of experimental double auction markets. American Economic Review, 74(1):60–72. Goddard, H. C. (1997). Sustainability, tradeable permits and the world’s large cities: a new proposal for controlling vehicle emissions, congestion and urban decentralization with an application to Mexico City. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 7:357–374. Graham, D. J. and Glaister, S. (2002). The demand for automobile fuel: A survey of elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36(1):1–26. Hahn, R. and Hester, G. (1989). Marketable permits: lessons for theory and practice. Ecology Law Quarterly, 16:361–406. Kagel, J. H. (1996). Double auction markets with stochastic supply and demand schedules: Call markets and continuous auction trading mechanism. Manuscript (University of Pittsburgh, Department of Economics, Pittsburgh, PA). Koh, W. and Lee, D. (1994). The vehicle quota system in Singapore: an assessment. Transportation Research Part A, 28:31–47. May, A. D. (1992). Road pricing: An international perspective. Transportation, 19:313–333. Rafferty, P. and Levinson, D. (2009). Delayer pays principle: Examining congestion pricing with compensation. International Journal of Transport Economics, 31(3):295–311. Raux, C. (2004). The use of transferable permits in transport policy. Transportation Research Part D, 9:185–197. Raux, C. (2008). The implementation and effectiveness of transport demand management measures. An international perspective. Number ISBN 9780754649533. Ashgate, England. Raux, C. and Marlot, G. (2005). A system of tradeable CO2 permits applied to fuel consumption by motorists. Transport Policy, 12:255–265. Smith, V. L. (1962). An experimental study of competitive market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 70:111–137. Verhoef, E. T., Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. (1996). The tradeoff between efficiency, effectiveness and social feasibility of regulating road transport externalities. Transportation Planning and Technology, 19:247–263. Verhoef, E. T., Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. (1997). Tradeable permits: their potential in the regulation of road transport externalities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24:527–548. Wadud, Z. (2010). Personal tradeable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins? Transportation Research Part A, doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.03.002. Weitzman, Martin L. (1974) Prices vs Quantities. The review of Economic Studies. 41(4): 477-491. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/26638 |