Amir-ud-Din, Rafi and Rashid, Abdul and Ahmad, Shabbir (2008): Democracy, Inequality and Economic Development: The Case of Pakistan.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_26935.pdf Download (267kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we made an attempt to understand the costs and benefits of democracy for economic growth in Pakistan by analyzing the relationship between democracy and its various measures. Using instrumental variables and RALS (rth-order autoregressive least squares) estimation techniques, it is shown that during the period 1972-2005, there is only a tenuous and uncertain relationship between democracy and fiscal policy variables like expenditures, revenues and deficit; whereas democracy has no impact at all on the income inequality. Moreover, we observed that the political rights had a significant negative impact on fiscal expenditures, suggesting that with an increase in political rights, the governing institutes begin to feel themselves more accountable and as such are more circumspect in expenditures.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Democracy, Inequality and Economic Development: The Case of Pakistan |
English Title: | Democracy, Inequality and Economic Development: The Case of Pakistan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Democracy; Political Rights; Fiscal Expenditures; Economic Growth; Income Inequality; Well-Being |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P50 - General |
Item ID: | 26935 |
Depositing User: | Dr Abdul Rashid |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2010 21:01 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 14:06 |
References: | Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson. 1998a. ‘Why did the West extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 1167–1199. Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson. 2002. ‘The Political Economy of the Kuznets Curve’, Review of Development Economics 6, 183–203. Ahmad, Mehboob. 2000. ‘Estimation of Distribution of Income in Pakistan Using Micro Data’, The Pakistan Development Review, 39: 4 Part II (Winter 2000) pp. 807–824. Alesina A. - Ozler S. - Roubini N. - Swagel P. 1992. ‘Political Instability and Economic Growth’, Journal of Economic Growth 1(2), 189-211. Aristotle.1962. ‘The Politics’, Penguin, Baltimore. Barro, R. 1996. ‘Democracy and Growth’, Journal of Economic Growth 1, 1–27. Beitz, C. 1982. ‘Democracy in Developing Societies’, in R.Gastil,ed., Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties, Freedom Press, New York. Bollen and R. Jackman. 1985. ‘Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income’, American Sociological Review 50, 438 –457. Borner S. - Brunetti A. - Weder B.1995. ‘Political Credibility and Economic Development’, New York, Macmillan Press. Bourguignon, F. and T. Verdier. 2000. ‘Oligarchy, Democracy, Inequality, and Growth’, Journal of Development Economics 62, 285 –313. Chong, A. and C. Caldero. 2000. ‘Institutional Quality and Income Distribution’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 48, 761–786. Decarolis, Francesco. 2003. ‘Economic Effects of Democracy: An Empirical Analysis’, Rivista Di Politica Economica, November-December 2003. Doornik, Jurgen A. and Hendry, David F. 2006. ‘Empirical Econometric Modelling, PcGive 11: Volume I’, London, Timberlake Consultants Ltd. Gradstein, M and B. Milanovic. 2000. ‘Does Liberte = Egalite? A Survey of the Empirical Evidence on the link between Political Democracy and Income Inequality’, Manuscript, The World Bank. Greene, William H. 2003. ‘Econometric Analysis’, 5th ed., Pearson Education, Delhi, 104-105. Helliwell J.F. 1992. ‘Empirical Linkages between Democracy and Economic Growth’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 4066. Huntington S.P. 1993. ‘The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century’, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press. Iqbal, Zafar and Siddiqui, Rizwana. 1998. ‘The Impact of Structural Adjustment on Income Distribution in Pakistan A SAM-based Analysis’, The Pakistan Development Review 37: 4 Part II (Winter 1998), 377–397. Porta R. - Lopez-De-Silanes F. - Shleifer A. - Vishny R. 1998. ‘The Quality of Government’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 6727. Lenski, G. 1966. ‘Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification’, McGraw Hill, New York. Lipset S.M. 1959. ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review 53 (1), 69-105. Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith, Polity IV Project. 800-2004. ‘Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions’, Dataset Users’ Manual. Meltzer A. - Richard S. 1981. ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of the Government’, Journal of Political Economy 89, 914-27. Olson M. JR. 1991. ‘Autocracy, Democracy and Prosperity’, in ZECKAUSER R.J. (ed.), Strategy and Choice, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, 131-57. Persson T. - Roland G. - Tabellini G. 2000. ‘Comparative Politics and Public Finance’, Journal of Political Economy 108, 1121-61. Persson T. - Tabellini G. 1994. ‘Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?’, American Economic Review 84 (3), 600-21. Przeworski A. - Limongi F. 1993. ‘Political Regimes and Economic Growth’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3), 51-69. Roll R. - Talbott J. 2001. ‘Why Many Developing Countries Just Aren’t’, Los Angeles, University of California, Anderson Graduate School of Management, Paper 1020. Tavares J. - Wacziarg R. 2001. ‘How Democracy Affects Growth’, European Economic Review 45 (8), 1341-78. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/26935 |