Pourquoi s'intéresser à la notion d'"Evidence -based policy" ?

Laurent, Catherine and Baudry, Jacques and Berrier-Solliec, Marielle and Kirsch, Marc and Perraud, Daniel and Tinel, Bruno and Trouvé, Aurélie and Allsopp, Nicky and Bonnafous, Partrick and Burel, Françoise and Carneiro, Maria Jose and Giraud, Christophe and Labarte, Pierre and Matose, Frank and Ricroch, Agnès (2009): Pourquoi s'intéresser à la notion d'"Evidence -based policy" ? Published in: Revue Tiers Monde No. 200 (December 2009): pp. 853-873.

Abstract

"Evidence-based medicine” approaches began to be formalized in the early 1990s to promote a conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in decision-making on care for individual patients. These approaches were subsequently extended to other spheres of public decision (education, justice, environment, poverty alleviation, etc.), giving birth to the concept of "evidence-based policy” (EBP). In the Francophone world, with the exception of the medical sector, these approaches are not well known. This is partly a problem of translation. In French, no concept associates the idea of empirical corroboration with that of proof, unlike English where they are both encapsulated in the word "evidence". The lack of familiarity with EBP also results from an intellectual tradition that is suspicious of simplistic pragmatisms in public action, which are believed to favour a principle of immediate effectiveness, regardless of the multiple dimensions of such action. The increasing use of the EBP concept is consequently often equated to mere rhetoric or to an attempt to depoliticize the debate by defending a normative model of decision-making grounded in the rational choice theory. This article presents a critical analysis of the debates on EBP. It shows how these debates argue for a renewal of positive approaches to public decision-making, primarily by proposing methods that facilitate circulation within the realm of existing knowledge, and that assess the quality of the empirical content of that knowledge. The article emphasizes the point that such debates contributes to offering an alternative to the increasing use of knowledge models based too exclusively on expert opinions or simulations that disclaim empirical validation tests. Finally, it suggests the need for more in-depth reflection on the types of evidence and the levels of proof that could support the design, implementation and evaluation of public policies, and points to some paths in that direction.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Why should we care about evidence-based policy?
• Language: French
• Keywords: Evidence based policy, public policies, development, scientific knowledge, proofs, agriculture, environment, biodiversity, France, Brasil, South Africa
• Subjects: N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B29 - Other; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights

References

Adams W.M., Avelling R., Brockington D., Dickson B., Elliot J., Hutton J., Roe D., Vira B., Wolmer W. 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science. 306, 1147-1149

Berthelot Dir 2001, Epistémologie des sciences sociales. Paris, PUF

Callon M. 1986. Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc, L’Année sociologique, 169-208

Cartwright N. with help from Goldfinch A and Howick J., 2007. Evidence-based policy: Where is our theory of evidence? LSE and UCSD

Cartwright N., 1999. The dappled world. A study of the boundaries of science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Chattopadhyay R., Duflo E. 2004. Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India, Econometrica, Vol. 72, No. 5. 1409-1443.

Cochrane A. 1972. Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflection on health services. Réed. 2004. London RSM press

Davies H.T.O., Nutley S.M. 2001. Evidence-based policy and practice: moving from rhetoric to reality. Proceedings of the Third International Interdisciplinary Evidence-based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference, 86-95.

Dewey J., 1927. The public and its problems. Oxford, England, Holt, 224 p. Traduit vers le français par J.Zask en 2003 : Le public et ses problèmes, Publ. de l'Université de Pau , 204 p

EBM-WG, Evidence-based Medicine Working Group, [Guyatt Président] 1992. Evidence-Based Medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. vol 268, N°17, pp.2420-5

Fagot-Largeault A., 2005, Evidence-based medicine: its history and philosophy, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress, Petr Hájek, Luis Valdés-Villanueva, Dag Westerståhl, editors, London: King's College Publications.

Fagot-Largeault, A., 2002. La construction intersubjective de l'objectivité scientifique. In : Philosophie des sciences. Andler, Fagot-Largeault, Saint-Sernin,. Paris, Gallimard. 1: 129-225

Fox D. 2005. Evidence of Evidence-Based Policy: The Politics of Systematic Reviews in Coverage Decisions. Site Medscape. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/498490

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). 2008, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org

IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) 2008. Global Summary for Decision Makers. Beintema N, Bossio D., Dreyfus F., Fernandez M., Gurib-Fakim A., Hurni H., Izac A.-M., Jiggins J., Kranjac-Berisavljevic G., Leakey R., Ochola W., Osman-Elasha B., Plencovich C., Roling N., Rosegrant M., Rosenthal E., Smith L. Writting team. 41 p.

Kleinj D., Sutherland W. 2003. W. How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?Journal of Applied Ecology, 40 : 947–969

Latour B. 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. La découverte.

Laurent C., Baudry J., Berriet-Solliec M., Kirsch M., Perraud D., Tinel B., Trouvé A., Allsopp N., Bonnafous P., Burel F., Carneiro M.-J., Giraud C., Labarthe P., Matose F., Ricroch A. 2008. Autour de la notion d’Evidence based policy. Communication pour le Colloque « Les mots du développement. Génèse, usages et trajectoires », 13-14 Novembre 2008. Paris, 19 p. +annexes

Laurent C., Giraud C. Ricroch A., Allsopp N., Bonnafous P., Carneiro M.-J., Matose F. (eds) 2008. Difficultés d’accès aux connaissances scientifiques pour les décideurs publics chargés de concevoir les contenus techniques de mesures réglementaires mettant en jeu agriculture et préservation de la biodiversité. Rapport de recherche pour le programme ANR / Ebp-Biosoc. 80p. + annexes

LindblomC., 1959, The science of « Muddling through ». Public administration review, Vol 19: 2, 79-88.

Mitchell S. 2002, Integrative Pluralism” Biology and Philosophy, 17: 55-70.

Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons. 2003. Repenser la science. Belin, coll. Débats. Traduction depuis l’anglais par G. Ferné de l’ouvrage Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. 2001. Polity Press and Blackwell.

NutleyS. 2003. "Bridging the policy/ research divide. Reflections and Lessons from the UK". Keynote paper. Facing the Future: Engaging stakeholders and citizens in developing public policy. NIG Conference. Canberra. 20p.

Perraud D. Trouvé A. Laurent C. 2008. Place des connaissances scientifiques dans les décisions publiques : l’émergence du débat sur l’EBP dans le domaine agricole. Communication aux rencontres INRA-CIRAD SFER. 11 et 12 décembre 2008.

Pretty J., 1995. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World development. Vol. 23 : 1247-1263.

Pullin A.S., Knight T.M., Stone D.A., Charman K. 2004. Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological conservation 119, 245-252.

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Muir Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. 1996. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312 :71-2

Selmi A. 2006. Administrer la nature. Edition de la maison des sciences de l’homme.485 p.

Sutherland W. et al. 2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of applied ecology, 617-727

Sutherland W., Pullin A., Dolman P., Knight T. 2004. The need for evidence-based conservation, TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution Vol.19 N°.6, 305-308

Weber M. (1959 / 1919) Le savant et le politique. Préface de R.Aron.