Pohlmann, Tim (2010): Attributes and Dynamic Development Phases of Informal ICT Consortia.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_27341.pdf Download (92kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Theoretical and empirical analyses about informal consortia are not yet able to entirely illustrate the informal standard setting landscape. This paper tries to provide a broad and comprehensive picture of informal standards consortia and their dynamic development in the past ten years. Analyses show that consortia have distinct characteristics which help to position and explain their existence in the standard setting context. Furthermore the observation of consortia survival identifies relationships between the formation, termination and merger of consortia and market development. The paper is thus able to reveal unique consortia features such as flexibility in formation and speed of reaction to market needs. Formal standardization is in contrast an often protracted process of development and negotiation. Involvement in informal standard setting is in less bureaucratic and allows, in respect to the tiered membership structures, a strategic influence from participating firms. These main insights justify a distinct research on the role of informal standard setting in the ICT industry.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Attributes and Dynamic Development Phases of Informal ICT Consortia |
English Title: | Attributes and Dynamic Development Phases of Informal ICT Consortia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Standard Setting, Standards Consortia, ICT Industry, IP Policy, Technological Development |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L16 - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics: Industrial Structure and Structural Change ; Industrial Price Indices L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L15 - Information and Product Quality ; Standardization and Compatibility |
Item ID: | 27341 |
Depositing User: | Tim Pohlmann |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2010 20:47 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:49 |
References: | Anderson, P. (2008). Evaluation of Ten Standard Setting Organizations with Regard to Open Standards, Prepared for I T - o g Telestyrelsen, IDC Special Study. Blind, K.; Gauch, S. (2008).Trends in ICT standards in European standardization bodies and standards consortia. Telecommunication Policy, 32, 503–513. Blind, K.; Gauch, S.; Hawkins, R. (2010): How stakeholders view the impacts of international ICT standards, Telecommunications Policy, 34, No.3, 162-174. Bunduchi, R.; Graham, I.; Smart, A.; Williams, R. (2008). Homogeneity and heterogeneity in information technology private standard settings – the institutional account, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Vol. 20, No. 4, July 2008, 389–407. Cargill, C.; Weiss, M. (1992). Consortia in the Standards Development Process, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Volume 43 Issue 8, 559 – 565. Cargill, C. (2002). Intellectual Property Rights and Standards Setting Organizations: An Overview of failed evolution, A Report Issued By the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, March 2002. CEN/ISSS (2009). CEN/ISSS survey of standards-related fora and consortia, 15th edition, Brussels, October 2009. Coulon, F. (2004). Proprietary standardisation in consortia –the case of the Symbian alliance, Research Design 9th EURAS Workshop on Standardisation, May 13-14th, 2004. David, P. A. (1996). Formal standard-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Telecommunications Policy, 20, 789–815. Egyedi, T.M. (2001), Beyond Consortia, Beyond Standardisation? New Case Material and Policy Threads. Final Report for the European Commission. Delft. The Netherlands. Grotnes, E. (2009). Standardization as open innovation: two cases from the mobile industry, Information Technology & People, Volume 22, Number 4, 367-381. Hawkins, R. (1999). The rise of consortia in the information and communication industries: emerging implications for policy. Telecommunication Policy, 23, 159–173. Jakobs, K. (2003). Information Technology Standards, Standards Setting and Standards Research. Presented at: Stanhope Centers Roundtable on systematic barriers to the inclusion of a public interest voice in the design of ICT, Cotswolds Conference, December 2003. Jakobs, K. (2004). ICT Standards Development — Finding the Best Platform, Enterprise Interoperability, Springer London, 543-552. Koenig, R. (2008). New ways of standard-setting in technology-driven industries: the case of automotive electronics in Japan and Germany, DRUID-DIME Academy Winter 2008 PhD Conference. Updegrove, A. (1995). Consortia and the Role of the Government in Standard Setting, in B. Kahin & J. Abbate (Eds.). Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure, Cambridge: MIT Press, 321-348. Updegrove, A. (2008). The Essential Guide to Standards, Handbook of Consortium Info in: [http://www.consortiuminfo.org]. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/27341 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Attributes and Dynamic Development Phases of Informal ICT Consortia. (deposited 13 Dec 2010 20:47) [Currently Displayed]