Climate change: discount or not? future generations don't care that much.

Belgodere, Antoine (2010): Climate change: discount or not? future generations don't care that much.

Abstract

This paper proposes a new way to model the cost of climate change, based on a vintage capital modeling. Climate change destroys capital, according to the difference between the current climate and the climate that prevailed when a given durable was built. This assumption is meant to account for the adaptation of economic agents to the changing climate. The main result is that the carbon tax is much less sensitive to the rate of time preference than in the Stern-Nordhaus controversy. Moreover, despite an estimate of the cost in line with Nordhaus' estimate for the 21st century, we find an optimal carbon tax much lower than his one.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: global warming, stock pollution, carbon tax, discount rate
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming

References

Bietak, M., 1996. Avaris : the capital of the Hyksos: recent excavations at Tell el-Dab'a. British Museum Press for the Trustees of the British Museum.

Choiniere, C. J., Horowitz, J. K., 2000. A production function approach to the gdp-temperature relationship. MimeoAvailable at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=267352.

Dell, M., Jones, B. F., Olken, B. A., May 2009. Temperature and income: Reconciling new cross-sectional and panel estimates. American Economic Review 99 (2), 198-204.

Forster, B., 1973. Optimal consumption planning in a polluted environment. Economic Record 49, 534-545.

Gollier, C., 2006. An evaluation of stern's report on the economics of climate change. Tech. rep.

Grimaud, A., Rouge, L., Jun. 2005. Polluting non-renewable resources, innovation and growth: Welfare and environmental policy. Resource and Energy Economics 27 (2), 109-129.

Heal, G., Winter 2009. Climate economics: A meta-review and some suggestions for future research. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3 (1), 4-21.

Krautkraemer, J., 1985. Optimal growth, resource amenities, and the preservation of natural environments. Review of Economic Studies 52, 153-170.

Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D., Shaw, D., September 1994. The impact of global warming on agriculture: A ricardian analysis. American Economic Review 84 (4), 753-71.

Nordhaus, W. D., 2007. The Challenge of Global Warming: Economic Models and Environmental Policy. Yale University.

Ploeg, F., Withagen, C., 1991. Pollution control and the ramsey problem. Environmental & Resource Economics 1 (2), 215-236.

Plourde, C., 1972. A model of waste accumulation and disposal. The Canadian Journal of Economics 5, 119-125.

Sinclair, P., 1992. High does nothing and rising is worse: Carbon taxes should be kept declining to cut harmful emissions. Manchester School 60, 41-52.

Stern, N., 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press.

Stollery, K., August 1998. Constant utility paths and irreversible global warming. Canadian Journal of Economics 31 (3), 730-742.

Tol, R., February 2002. Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part ii. dynamic estimates. Environmental & Resource Economics 21 (2), 135-160.

Van Kooten, G., 2004. Climate change economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Weitzman, M. L., September 2007. A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 45 (3), 703-724.