MIRUCKI, Jean (1999): Economics Research in France: Tentative Conclusions Based on EconLit Database. Published in: Higher Education Management , Vol. 12, No. 1 (March 2000): pp. 85-103.
Download (163kB) | Preview
Despite France’s influential role in and significant impact on the development of economic thought in the past, it seems that no recent publication has assembled an up-to-date inventory of its internationally best known contemporary economists. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to produce an exploratory survey for 1998 of the scientific contributions of representative economics research groups in France based on the EconLit bibliographic database. Three indicators, one relating to overall visibility, one to net production and one to international presence, have been used to evaluate and compare two major categories of representative groups: the “French specificity” category [including Conseil National des Universités (CNU) and agrégation groups] and another made up of more “traditional” groups (including editorial committees of journals and the chairmen and management committee of a national association of economists). The results indicate a clear dichotomy between the two. Moreover, the poor performance of the first of the above categories measured by all three indicators raises serious questions about the way the public university system operates in France and the future implications thereof in the light of the globalisation of the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economics Research in France: Tentative Conclusions Based on EconLit Database|
|Keywords:||EconLit; research groups; French specificity; visibility; international presence; France; journal contributions|
|Subjects:||A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics|
|Depositing User:||Jean Mirucki|
|Date Deposited:||23. Dec 2010 07:32|
|Last Modified:||01. Jan 2016 16:23|
BAIRAM, E.I. (1994), “Institutional affiliations of contributors to top economic journals, 1985-1990”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 32, pp. 674-679.
BLANK, R.M. (1991), “The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence", American Economic Review, Vol. 81, pp. 1041-1067.
BOURGUINAT, H. (1997), “Rapport sur le concours d’agrégation de sciences économiques 1995-1996”, Revue d’Économie Politique, Vol. 107, pp. 131-140.
CHERVEL, A. (1993), Histoire de l’agrégation, Institut national de recherches pédagogiques, Éditions Kimé, Paris.
CHUNG, K.H., COX, R.A.K. and OKUNADE, A.A. (1993), “Publishing behavior of individuals and most prolific authors in the economics literature”, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 32-42.
COLANDER, D. (1989), “Research on the economics profession”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 3, pp. 137-148.
CONROY, M.E. et al. (1995), “The productivity of economics departments in the US: Publications in the core journals”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 33, pp. 1966-1971.
DAVIS, P. and PAPANEK, G. (1984), “Faculty rating of major economics departments by citations”, American Economic Review, Vol. 74, pp. 225-229.
DELORME, C.D. and KAMERSCHEN, D.R. (1987), “What ‘Who’s Who in Economics’ tells us about the economics profession”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 37, pp. 65-79.
DOWNING, P.B. and STAFFORD, E.A. (1981), “Citations as an indicator of classic works and major contributors in social science”, Public Choice, Vol. 37, pp. 219-230.
EHRENBERG, R.G. (coordinated by) (1997), The American University: National Treasure or Endangered Species? Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
FREY, B.S. and EICHENBERGER, R. (1993), “American and European economics and economists”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 7, p. 185-193. Higher Education Management 102 OECD 2000
GANS, J.S. and SHEPHERD, G.B. (1994), “How are the mighty fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, pp. 165-179.
GOODWIN, T.H. and SAUER, R.D. (1995), “Life cycle productivity in academic research: evidence from cumulative publication histories of academic economists”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 61, pp. 728-743.
HAMERMESH, D.S. (1994), “Facts and myths about refereeing”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, pp. 153-163.
HANSEN, W.L. (1991), “The education and training of economics doctorates”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 29, pp. 1054-1087.
HICKS, D. (1999), “The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences”, Scientometrics, Vol. 44, pp. 193-217.
HODGSON, G.M. and ROTHMAN, H. (1999), “The editors and authors of economics journals: a case of institutional oligopoly?”, Economic Journal, Vol. 109, pp. 165-186.
KASPER, H. et al. (1991), “The education of economists”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 29, pp. 1088-1109.
KOLM, S.C. (1988), “Economics in Europe and the US.”, European Economic Review, Vol. 32, pp. 207-212.
LABAND, D.N. (1990), “Measuring the relative impact of economics book publishers and economics journals”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 28, pp. 655-660.
LABAND, D.N. and PIETTE, M.J. (1994), “The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970-1990”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 30, pp. 640-666.
LAFFONT, J.J. (1995), “Réflexions sur l’agrégation d’économie”, Revue d’Économie Politique, Vol. 105, pp. 353-356.
LIEBOWITZ, S.J. and PALMER, J.P. (1984), “Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 22, pp. 77-88.
LOVELL, M.C. (1973), “The Production of Economic Literature: An Interpretation”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 11, pp. 27-55.
McPHERSON, M.S. and SCHAPIRO, M.O. (1999), “Tenure Issues in Higher Education”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 13, pp. 85-98.
MIRUCKI, J. (1986), “Prix Nobel: les lauréats prennent de l’âge”, Collection: Des idées, des événements, Le Devoir, 21 octobre 1986.
MIRUCKI, J. (1999a), “A Visibility Analysis of the Scientific Production of Ukrainian Economists: 1969-94”, Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 28, pp. 221-232. Economics Research in France: Tentative Conclusions Based on EconLit Database 103 OECD 2000
MIRUCKI, J. (1999b), “What does an American Economic Association Foreign Honorary Membership Nomination Really Imply?”, working paper.
NEDERHOF, A.J. and WIJK, E. (1999), “Profiling Institutes: Identifying High Research Performance and Social Relevance in the Social and Behavioral Sciences”, Scientometrics, Vol. 44, pp. 487-506.
PORTES, R. (1987), “Economics in Europe”, European Economic Review, Vol. 31, pp. 1329-1340.
RATIER-COUTROT, L. (1985), “Les économistes français vus d’Amérique”, Futuribles, Vol. 91, pp. 71-76.
WOLFELSPERGER, A., POMMEREHNE, W.W. and FREY, B.S. (1988), “La valeur des économistes français”, Revue française d’économie, Vol. 3, pp. 145-174.
WOUTERS, P. (1999), “Beyond the Holy Grail: from citation theory to indicator theories”, Scientometrics, Vol. 44, pp. 561-580