Castellacci, Fulvio (2009): How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway.
Download (287kB) | Preview
The paper investigates the effects of industry-level competition on firm-level innovation and productivity. We propose a refined version of the CDM model that analyses the impacts of competition on four interrelated stages of the innovation process: the choice of a firm to engage in innovation, its R&D intensity, its innovation output and labour productivity. We test the model on a firm-level panel dataset based on the last three waves of the innovation survey for Norway (CIS3, CIS4 and CIS5). The econometric results provide empirical support for the refined version of the CDM model. They show that enterprises in oligopolistic sectors have on average a greater propensity to engage in innovative activities and tend to invest a greater amount of resources in R&D. On the other hand, firms in competitive industries are characterised by a stronger impact of innovation input on their technological and economic performance.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway|
|Keywords:||Competition; innovation; productivity; CDM model; CIS data|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
|Depositing User:||Fulvio Castellacci|
|Date Deposited:||21. Dec 2010 13:33|
|Last Modified:||13. Mar 2015 06:21|
Ahn, S. 2002. Competition, Innovation and Productivity Growth: A Review of Theory and Evidence. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 317, OECD, Paris.
Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt. 2005. Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, no. 2: 701-728.
Aghion, P., R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt, and S. Prantl, S. 2009. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics 91, no. 1: 20-32.
Aghion, P., C. Harris, and J. Vickers. 1997. Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: an example. European Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings: 771-782.
Antonelli, C. 2009. The economics of innovation: From the classical legacies to the economics of complexity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18: 1-36.
Aw, B. Y., M. Roberts, and T. Winston. 2007. The complementary role of exports and R&D investments as sources of productivity growth. The World Economy 30: 83-104.
Bartelsman, E. J. and M. Doms. 2000. Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata. Journal of Economic Literature 38, no. 3: 569-594.
Beck, N. 2001. Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science 4: 271-293.
Castellacci, F. 2007. Evolutionary and new growth theories. Are they converging? Journal of Economic Surveys 21, no. 3: 585-627.
Castellacci, F. 2008. Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75: 984-1006.
Castellacci, F. and J. Zheng. 2010. Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm level productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, in press.
Cohen, W. M. and R. Levin. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume II, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Crepon, B., E. Duguet and J. Mairesse. 1998. Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7, no. 2: 115-158.
Geroski, P.A. 1990. Innovation, Technological Opportunity and Market Structure. Oxford Economic Papers 42, no. 3: 586-602.
Griffith, R., R Harrison and H. Simpson. 2006. Product Market Reform and Innovation in the EU. CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 5849.
Griffith, R., H. Huergo, J. Mairesse and B. Peters. 2006. Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22, no.4: 483-498.
Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92-116.
Hall, B. and J. Mairesse. 2006. Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15, no. 4&5: 289-299.
Klepper, S. 1996. Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. American Economic Review 86, no. 3: 562-583.
Klepper, S. 1997. Industry Life Cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6, no. 1: 145-181.
Kokko, A., P. Tingvall, and S. Taavo. 2010. Country preferences and exports: can ESC votes explain international trade patterns? Stockhom School of Economics, mimeo.
Lööf, H. and A. Heshmati. 2006. On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15, no. 4&5: 317-344.
Malerba, F. 2005. Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo. 1996. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy 25: 451-478.
Nelson, R. and S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nickell, S.J. 1996. Competition and Corporate Performance. Journal of Political Economy. 104, no. 4: 724-746.
Nicoletti, G. and S. Scarpetta. 2004. Regulation, Productivity and Growth: OECD Evidence. Economic Policy 18: 9-72.
Parisi, M. L., F. Schiantarelli, and A. Sembenelli. 2006. Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy. European Economic Review 50, no. 8: 2037-2061.
Plümper, T. and E.V. Troeger. 2007. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15, no. 2: 124-139.
Scherer, F. 1967. Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers. American Economic Review 56: 524-531.
Sutton, J. 1997. Market Structure and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tang, J. 2006. Competition and Innovation Behaviour. Research Policy 35: 68-82.
Wieser, R., 2005. Research and development productivity and spillovers: empirical evidence at the firm level. Journal of Economic Surveys 19, no.4: 587-621.