Sukati, Mphumuzi (2011): The SADC Region and EPA/EBAI - Potential Winners and Losers.
Download (503kB) | Preview
The aim of the paper is to investigate convergence tendencies in the SADC region and to determine whether the EPA/EBAI policies between SADC and EU_27 member states will promote such convergence tendencies. The analyses of the EPA/ABAI policies make further conclusion on SADC member states’ potential winners and losers from changes in trade profile brought about by these policies since individual SADC member states are heterogeneous in their trade profile. Therefore these policies outcome will likely have negative or positive effects on economic growth and convergence tendencies of individual member states of the SADC region. The study has found evidence of absolute convergence in the SADC region using income and GDP growth rates data for the year 2008 to 2015. Further analysis of the effects of the EPA/EBAI policies reveal that SADC LDC are likely to be winners except Madagascar and Tanzania while the SADC ACP countries are possible winners on condition they set up enabling environments that promote development of industries where they are likely to benefit more given their export profile which is an indicator of their comparative advantage. It is further concluded that overall the EPA/EBAI will likely promote convergence tendencies and be beneficial to the region as a whole.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The SADC Region and EPA/EBAI - Potential Winners and Losers|
|Keywords:||EPA/EBAI policies; SADC; EU_27; ACP; LDC; Convergence; GTAP|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations
|Depositing User:||Mphumuzi Sukati|
|Date Deposited:||12. Jan 2011 21:08|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 08:42|
1.Barro, R. (1991). ‘Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.106, No. 3: 407-43
2.Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X.1992).‘Convergence’. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No.2 : 223-251
3.Caceres, L.R. and O.N. Sandoval (1999). Crecimiento Economico y Divergencia en la America Latina: 781-796
4.Cardenas, M. and A. Ponton (1995). ‘Growth and convergence in Colombia: 1950-1990’. Journal of Development Economics 47: 5-37
5.Development Network Africa (2007). ‘Evaluation of an Appropriate Model for a SADC Customs Union.’ Report Commissioned by The SADC Secretariat
6.Dobson, S. and C. Ramlogan (2002). ‘Economic Growth and Convergence in Latin America’. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol.38, No. 6, August 2002: 83-104
7.Esquivel, G. (1999). ‘Convergencia regional en Mexico: 1940-1995’. Trimestre Economico: 725-761
8.European Commission Report, 2007. ‘Annual Operational Review-Swaziland’. Directorate-General Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific States. Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles
9.Hertel T (1997). ‘Global Trade Analysis: Modelling and Application.’ Purdue University :Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CB2 1RP
10.Narayanan G. (2008). ‘Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 7 Data Base’. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
11.SADC SECRETARIAT (2008). ‘Regional Economic Integration: A Strategy for Poverty Eradication Towards Sustainable Development’. SADC International Conference on Poverty and Development: 18 – 20 April 2008, Pailles, Mauritius.
12.Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1996). ‘Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence’. European Economic Review 40: 1325-1352.