Connotation of minor millet biodiversity and indirect payments in tribal homesteads in the backdrop of climate change.

Aravindakshan, Sreejith and Sherief, Aliyaru Kunju (2010): Connotation of minor millet biodiversity and indirect payments in tribal homesteads in the backdrop of climate change. Published in: Proceedings of Indian Biodiversity Congress (IBC) -2010, Thiruvananthapuram, India. (January 2011)

Abstract

Unscathed agrobiodiversity remaining in-situ today is found on the small-scale farms and homestead gardens of poorer and developing countries (Brookfield, 2001). The indigenous traditional farming of Muthuvan tribe as the case of Finger millet or Ragi (Eleusine coracana), a minor millet cultivated in the Western Ghats in Kerala in the Indian South is one such classic example for in-situ agrobiodiversity management, based on organic farming systems. On such fields, the use of labour intensive, traditional production techniques have persisted throughout the period of controlled state farming and the market based large-scale farming. The homestead gardens close to fringes of ‘South Western Ghats-the hotspot of biodiversity’ also play a crucial role in tribalistic context, by contributing to the rural livelihoods in time periods and locations when markets or state institutions do not. This paper attempts to analyse the opportunity costs of minor millet cultivation incurred by indigenous tribe in scheming compensations for biodiversity conservation. It further discusses possibilities to deliver a tangible and hopeful alternative towards sustainable livelihood in the backdrop of climate change. The methodology involves use of ‘Switching Regression model’ in the estimation and comprehension of opportunity costs, and further looks at its relevance in traditional farming of underutilised minor millets in the tribal homesteads and is equated in terms of indirect payment for biodiversity conservation. The analysis of results concludes the importance of creating incentives for the conservation of agrobiodiversity, especially the on-farm diversity of underutilised crops and supporting poverty alleviation, and preventing welfare losses among vulnerable communities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: agro-biodiversity; muthuvan; minor millets; opportunity cost; payment; organic agriculture; tribal homesteads; sustainable livelihoods; indigenous people; climate change
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Brookfield H., (2001), ‘Exploring Agrodiversity’, New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN 0-231-10233-X.

Damu T., (2003), ‘Helping “Ecosystem People” Protect Wilderness and Their Own Welfare’, USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-27. 2003

Dasgupta, S., Hamilton, K., Pagiola, S. and Wheeler, D., (2008). ‘Environmental Economics at the World Bank’., Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, pp. 1–23 doi:10.1093/reep/rem025.

Freeman, H.A., Ehui, S.K., Jabbar, M.A., (1998), ‘Credit constraint and smallholder dairy production in the East African highlands: application of a switching regression model’. Agricultural Economics 19, pp. 33–34.

Gruère G. P., Nagarajan L, Oliver King E.D.I., (2007) ‘Collective Action and Marketing of Underutilized Plant Species: The Case of Minor Millets in Kolli Hills, Tamil Nadu, India’, CAPRi Working Paper No. 69. October 2007, Washington DC, USA.

Landell-Mills, N., Porras, I., (2002). ‘Silver bullet or fools' gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor’. IIED, London.

Maddala, G.S., (1983). ‘Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mayrand, K. and Paquin, M., (2004). ‘Payments for environmental services: a survey and assessment of current schemes.’ Unisfera International Centre, Montreal, Canada.

MEA., (2005). ‘Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers’. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. WRI, Washington DC.

Myers N., (1988), ‘Threatened biotas: “Hot spots” in tropical forests’. The Environmentalist 8: 1–20.

Narloch U., Pascual U., Drucker A G., (2009), ‘Payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services (PACS): Creating incentive mechanisms for the sustained on-farm utilization of plant and animal genetic resources’ paper presented at 11th Annual BioEcon Conference in Venice, Italy, 21-22 September 2009

Pagiola, S., Bishop J., and. Landell-Mills N, (2002). ‘Selling forest environmental services.Market-based mechanisms for conservation and development’. ed. Earthscan, London.

Pascual U., Muradian, M., Rodriguez L C. and Duraiappah A K. , (2009), ‘Revisiting the relationship between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services’, Ecosystem Services Economics (ESE) Working Paper Series No.1, The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya.

Ravnborg, H.M., Damsgaard, M.G. and Raben, K. , (2007). ‘Payment for environmental services: Issues and pro-poor opportunities for development assistance’. DIIS Report 2007:6, Danish Institute for International Studies: Copenhagen.

Sthapit B., Padulosi S. and Mal B. , (2009), ‘Role of On-farm/In situ Conservation and Underutilized Crops in the Wake of Climate Change’ Paper presented in the National Symposium on Recent Global Developments in the Management of Plant Genetic Resources, NBPGR, New Delhi, India,17-18 Dec. 2009

Wale E.Z, (2007) ‘A study on financial opportunity costs of growing local varieties of sorghum in Ethiopia: Implications for on-farm conservation policy’, Ecological Economics (Elsevier), 64 (2008) pp. 603–610.

Wale, E.Z., Mburu, J., Holm-Müller, K., Zeller, M., (2005), ‘Economic analysis of farmers' preferences for coffee variety attributes: lessons for on-farm conservation and technology adoption in Ethiopia’., Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 44 (2), 121–139.

WBGU (The German Advisory Council on Global Change), (2009), ‘Solving the Climate Dilemma -The Budget Approach’, WBGU, Berlin.

Wunder, S., (2007). ‘The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical Conservation’. Conservation Biology 21 (1): 48–58