Samà, Danilo (2011): The relationship between common management and ecotourism regulation: tragedy or triumph of the commons? A Law & Economics answer.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_28978.pdf Download (232kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Since its origin, ecotourism development has been at the centre of controversial and heated debates within the environmental and scientific society. On one hand, it has been considered as a model of responsible and sustainable tourism with the capacity to guarantee the conservation of the current biodiversity level and cultural identity, to educate the tourists about preservation and to improve the economic activity and the standard of living of the populations affected. On the other hand, it has been criticized for actually being a mere instrument in the hands of capitalist and western firms to commercially exploit the natural resources available in the less developed countries. Thus, are the ecotourism projects more likely to be profitable and successful in territories where the common resources are controlled by the state or managed by private firms? Considered the most frequent and spontaneous solution noticed in the ordinary daily life of the emerging countries, meaning natural resources owned communally by local institutions, does ecotourism impede or reinforce this management function of coordinating and controlling? The empirical researches conducted in literature tried to answer to some of the above-mentioned questions and offered the opportunity for a Law and Economics assessment of the problem related to the common-pool resources.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The relationship between common management and ecotourism regulation: tragedy or triumph of the commons? A Law & Economics answer |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Common-Pool Resources, Commons Management, Development, Ecology, Environment, Governance, Property Rights, Sustainability, Tragedy of the Commons |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K32 - Environmental, Health, and Safety Law K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K11 - Property Law Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology |
Item ID: | 28978 |
Depositing User: | Dr Danilo Samà |
Date Deposited: | 20 Feb 2011 20:22 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2020 13:37 |
References: | Bishop, R.C., Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V. (1975), “Common Property” as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy, Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 15, University of New Mexico, School of Law, Stanford, United States, pp. 713-727. Hardin, G. (1968), The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, Vol. 162, No. 3859, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington D.C., United States, pp. 1243-1248. Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/28978 |
Available Versions of this Item
- The relationship between common management and ecotourism regulation: tragedy or triumph of the commons? A Law & Economics answer. (deposited 20 Feb 2011 20:22) [Currently Displayed]