The Survival of the Fattest. Evolution of needs, lust and social value in a long-run perspective

Hanappi, Hardy (2004): The Survival of the Fattest. Evolution of needs, lust and social value in a long-run perspective.

Abstract

As recent data on average weight of human individuals in OECD countries vividly documents the primary metabolism of human individuals, e.g. physical reproduction, already produces deteriorating results. The concept of needs in the sense of desires for primary reproduction necessities has to be re-conceptualized.

What has been substituted for the power of needs was the desire for lust: Consumers are offered objects for which they subjectively should develop a substitute of an objective need, namely lust to consume. While the former concept (needs) has a physiologically rather limited range of extension, the latter one enables an evolutionary expanding dynamic with no evident limitation in sight. It is this contradiction that inspired the question posed in the title of this paper. To formulate it less metaphorical: If the demand side of the evolutionary development of modern societies is concentrating more and more on the emergence of goods and services that are independent of the primary metabolism of humans, will there be a feedback on this primary metabolism that endangers its further processing?

In hindsight the history of economic thought can be interpreted as providing answers to this type of questions in the form of theories of social values. A common denominator of these theories – perhaps the smallest one – is the contention that a model of the mentioned contradiction has to incorporate a systemic valuation system. Activities of members of societies should be regulated by a superimposed and commonly understood mechanism. While early contributions favored control by a set of direct behavioral rules, a command list, authors since Adam Smith in one or the other way refer to indirect regulation of economic activity via price structures. Note that Smith’s argument concerning ‘private vices becoming public benefits’ already related a non-metabolic motive, the lust for profit, with the metabolic notion of social welfare. Smith preaches this contradiction as moral philosophy. Karl Marx puts Smith’s observation in historical perspective; the productivity increasing capitalist system will be a necessary but finite episode in human history. And he adds an important dimension: The contradiction between private motives and welfare will work only temporarily and will produce another social contradiction, the one between exploiters and exploited. This new amendment explains the central role of Marx’ labor theory of value as a regulation device for the emergence of new contradictions. After Marx two strands of economic theory stand out as cornerstones of theories of social value: Jevon’s price theory and Schumpeter’s price-breakers theory. The former managed to establish itself as mainstream economics till today; the latter – in a self-referential way – seems to re-appear again and again as subversive swarming of theory innovators.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: evolutionary economics, needs, social value, lust
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General

References

Bortkiewicz L., 1906, Wertrechnung und Preisrechnung im Marxschen System, Archiv für ozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Bd.23, Tübingen.

Boyer and Saillard, 1995, Regulation Theory. The State of the Art, Routledge, London.

Delorme R. and Dopfer K. (eds), 2004, The Political Economy of Diversity, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.

Dopfer K. and Potts J., 2004, Micro-Meso-Macro, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

Hanappi H., 1986, The Stages of Industrial Capitalism. Invited Paper on the International Workshop "Technological and Social Factors in Long Term Fluctuations" ,University of Siena december 1986. Published by Springer Verlag 1989, editor: A.Vercelli et al.

Hanappi H., Kump O., 2002, Collect now - Consume later: On Innovative Products in Electronic Commerce, Decision Support Systems, 2002/4.

Hanappi H., 1994, Evolutionary Economics. The Evolutionary Revolution in the Social Sciences, Avebury Publishers, Aldershot.

Hanappi H., 1999, Die Zukunft des Geldes (The Future of Money). Research Project of the Austrian National Bank, (1997-1999).

Hanappi H., 2003, Algorithmic Foundations of Evolutionary Economics, invited paper at the Wartensee Seminar (organizer: Kurt Dopfer), Wartensee (CH), July 2003.

Hanappi H., 2003b, Critical Masses and Prophecies, paper presented at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Economic Systems, Jena, July 2003

Hanappi H. and Hanappi-Egger E., 2004, New Combinations Taking Schumpeter’s concept serious, Paper contributed to the bi-annual conference of the ISS, Bocconi University (Milano, Italy), June 9-12, 2004.

Hanappi H., 2004b, Evolutionary Economic Programs, in: “Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik IX” edited by Wolfgang Kerber, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.

Harris J. and Goodwin N. (eds), 2003, New Thinking in Macroeconomics, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.

Hilferding R., 1909 (1968), Das Finanzkapital, Europäische Verlagsanstalt, Frankfurt a.M.

Hubbel S.P., 2001, The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Princeton University Press.

Mirowski Ph., 2002, Machine Dreams. Economics becomes a Cyborg Science, Cambridge University Press.

Schumpeter J., 1911 (1964), Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 6th edition, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.

Steedman I.,1977, Marx after Sraffa, Verso NLB, London.

Witt U., 2004, On Novelty and Heterogeneity, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Nr. 0405, MPI Jena.