Rajesh, K (2009): Participatory Institutions and People’s Practices in India: An analysis of Decentralisation experiences in Kerala State. Published in: The Grass Roots Governance Journal , Vol. 7, No. 1 & 2 (1. December 2009): pp. 113-131.
Download (150kB) | Preview
Institutions orient people towards a common goal. Institutions have a pertinent role in collective action. Participatory institutions have the potential to vitalize democracy by providing a pro active role to the citizens in decision making, planning and implementation of activities. In fact the performance of the institutions depends upon the practices of the people affiliated to them. The practices of the people are influenced by the field in which they are situated, and their habitus. Ultimately field (It is an objective historical relation between the positions in each realm of the society) and habitus(It is the way in which field enters in to an individual) are the decisive factors in people’s practices. Kerala’s decentralization experiments since the inception of the People’s Planning Campaign in 1996 have given more emphasis to participatory institutions. PPC viewed participatory institutions as forums for mobilizing different groups of people towards grassroots level democracy. This paper analyses the dynamics of institutions created by PPC in Kerala in light of their twelve years of functioning. The Paper also considers various factors that might have affected the functioning of institutions through a detailed analysis of Kerala’s political, economic,cultural and religious fields
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Participatory Institutions and People’s Practices in India: An analysis of Decentralisation experiences in Kerala State|
|Keywords:||Participatory institutions; habitus; people’s practices.|
|Subjects:||Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z19 - Other|
|Depositing User:||Rajesh Kottarath|
|Date Deposited:||16. Mar 2011 11:59|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 23:47|
Bourdieu, Pierre and Loic. J.D. Wacquant (1992): An invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Polity press, camebridge ,U.k.
Bourdieu,Pierre (Translated Richard nice) (1989): Distinction : A social critique of judgement of taste, Routeledge, London. .
Centre for Development Studies (2005), Human Development Report,Government of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram.
Chadopadyaya, Sreekumar (2004): ‘Poverty and environmental Degradation in selected areas of Kerala coast’ in Surya kanth ,etal (eds), Reinventing Regional development, Rawat publication ,NewDelhi ,pp:377-3
Chathukulam, Jos & John.M.S (2002): ‘Five years of participatory planning in Kerala : Rhetoric and reality’, Economic and Political Weekly, December 7 (Accessed from www.epw.org on 5/6/08).
Chathukulam, Jos and M.S. John (2007): ’Between Europhia and Skepticism: Ten years of Participatory planning in Kerala’, in M.A.Oommen (ed) A Decade of Decentralisation in Kerala Experience and Lessons, Har Anand Publications New Delhi, PP.54-58.
Eisenstadt, N.(ed) (1968): Max Weber on Charisma and Institution building,University of Chicago Press, USA..
Farrely, Colin (2004): Introduction to Contemporary Political Theory, Sage Publication, New Delhi, PP 137 – 151.
Giddens, Anthony (1972): Politics and Sociology in the thought of Max Weber,Macmillan, London.
Government of Kerala- Planning and Economic Affairs Department (2002):‘Guidelines for preparation of 10th Five year plan by Local Self Governments’,Government Order No.20/2002/ Planning, dated 6/6/2002.
Government of Kerala- Planning and Economic Affairs Department (2004):‘Modified Guidelines for preparation of annual plan under the 10th Five Year Plan by Local Self Governments’, Government Order No 40/2004/ planning.dated 31/3/2004.
Gurukkal, Rajan (2001): ‘When coalition of conflicting interests decentralizes: A theoretical critique of decentralization politics in Kerala’, Social Scientist, Vol.29,No.9-10, PP.8-47.
Harris, John, Janet Hunter and Collin. M. Lewis(Eds)(2000): The New institutional economics and Third world Development ,Routledge Publications,London
Heller, Patrick (2001): ‘Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa and Porto Alegra’, Politics and Society, Vol. 29, No. 1 ( March), PP. 131- 163.
Isaac, Thomas. T.M. & Richard. W. Frankie (2000): Local Democracy and Devolopment: People’s Campaign for Decentralised Planning in Kerala, Left word, New Delhi.
Jagajeevan, N and Rajesh. K (2005): ‘Asoothrana board, A – Soothrana board ayappol’, Chintha weekly (Malayalam), August 2005.
Kannan K.P.(2007): ‘From Human Development to economic growth: Kerala Turn around in growth powered by Human Development’, in .A Vidhyanthan and
K.L. Krishna(Eds), Institutions and Market in India’s Development: Essays for K.N.Raj,Oxford University Press,New Delhi, pp:319-344
Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad (KSSP) (2006): Kerala padanam(Kerala study-Malayalam), Kozhikode, Kerala
Kerala State Planning Board (1999): People’s Planning Towards A Handbook, Thiruvananthapuram.
Lachmann, L.M. (1970): The Legacy of Max Weber, Heinemann, London, PP. 49 – 91.
Local Self Government Department- Government of Kerala (2004): ‘Kerala Development Plan: Golden era of Achievements’ Statement by Cherkulam Abdullah, Local Self Government Minister- Government of Kerala.
Nair, Gopinathan, N.D. (2000):’People’s Planning in Kerala:A case study of two Village Panchayats’, Discussion paper, Kerala Research Programme for Local Level Development, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram.
Namboodiripad, E.M.S (1993) : ‘Panchayati -Nagarpalika Bills : A note’,Background paper presented in seminar on Panchayati Raj -Nagarpalika Bill and its implications for local self Government and decentralized development in Kerala,October 2&3 -1993.,CDS ,Thirurvananthapuram.
Parameswaran, M.P. (2001): ‘Politics of decentralization: Political Parties and civil society’,Paper presented in workshop on Experiments in Democratic Decentralisation, Johannesburg, June 24-28.
Pateman, Carole (1999): Participation and Democratic theory, Cambridge University Press, U.K.
Planning Commission – Government of India (2006): Evaluation Report on Decentralisation experience of Kerala, Programme evaluation Organisation, New Delhi..
Sharma, Rashmi (2007): ‘From Kalliassery to People’s plan campaign : Issues in Governance’ ,in Joseph T.M(Ed ),Local Governance in India : ideas challenger and strategies, concept publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 239-254.
Subramanian, K.Kand Syam prasad (2008): Rising in equality with high growth :Isn’t this trend worry some ? Analysis of Kerala experience, working paper no: 401,CDS, Thiruvananthapuram.
Tharakan, P.K.M (2004): ‘Historical hurdles in the course of people’s planning campaign in Kerala, India’, in John Harris, Kristian Stoke and Olle Tornquist (Eds) Politicizing Democracy:The new local politics of democratization, Palgrave Macmillan, London,PP.107-127
Tharakan,P.K.M (2008):When kerala model development is Historicised :A chronological Perspective , Working paper no;19,Center for Socio Ecnomic and Environmental studies(CSES} ,Kochi, kerala
Tharamangalam, Joseph (2003): ‘Keralathinte vikasanatakarcha’ (Developmental degradation of Kerala, Malayalam) in T.T. Sreekumar and S.Sanjeev (Eds) Katha ithuvare :Kerala Vikasana samvadhangal (Debates on Kerala Development), D.c.Books, Kottayam, PP: 15-41.
The Hindu, 20th February 2009.
Thomas, E.M. (2006): ‘A decade of people’s participation in decentralized planning in Kerala: a case study’, Administrative Change, Vol. XXXIII, No.2 and Vol. XXXIV No.1 (January – December), PP 34 – 46.
Tornquist, Olle (2000): ‘Movement Politics and Development: the case of Kerala’, Paper presented in international seminar on Democratic Decentralisation, May 23-27, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala State Planning Board
Tornquist, Olle (2007): ‘The Politics of Democratic Decentralisation’, in M.A.Oommen (ed), A Decade of decentralization in Kerala:Experience and lessons, Har Anand Publications ,New Delhi, PP.23-40..
Warren, Mark. E. (1995): ‘The self in discursive democracy’ in Stephen. K.White (Ed), The Cambridge companion to Habermas, Cambridge University Press in New York