Schoder, Christian (2011): Kaleckian vs. Marxian specifications of the investment function: Some empirical evidence for the US.
Download (252kB) | Preview
Following Lavoie et al. (2004), this paper empirically assesses four investment functions closing the Kaleckian baseline model in the long-run: (a) the Naive-Kaleckian specification without any long-run adjustment; (b) the Intermediate-Kaleckian specification with an endogenous adjustment of the normal utilization rate; (c) the Hysteresis-Kaleckian specification with an additional endogenous adjustment of autonomous investment; and (d) the French-Marxian specification with an exogenous normal utilization rate and endogenous autonomous investment. Confronting these specifications with data of the US manufacturing sector, we compare them with respect to the plausibility of the parameter estimates, the goodness of fit, the parameter stability, the out-of-sample performances and relative encompassing. We find the Intermediate-Kaleckian specification to be superior. For the Hysteresis-Kaleckian specification, we get implausible results which contradict Lavoie et al. (2004). Yet, their estimates seem to be biased due to endogeneity issues.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Kaleckian vs. Marxian specifications of the investment function: Some empirical evidence for the US|
|Keywords:||Kaleckian growth model, Marxian growth model, investment functions, post-Keynesian economics|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E22 - Investment ; Capital ; Intangible Capital ; Capacity
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian
|Depositing User:||Christian Schoder|
|Date Deposited:||21. Mar 2011 12:31|
|Last Modified:||21. Feb 2013 23:43|
Chow, G. C., Lin, A. (1971): Best Linear Unbiased Interpolation, Distribution, and Extrapolation of Time Series by Related Series, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 53(4), pp. 372-5.
Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J. G. (1981): Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypothesis, Econometrica, 49(3), pp. 781-93.
Dumenil, G., Levy, D. (1995): A post-Keynesian long-term equilibrium with equalized profit rates? A rejoinder to Amitava Dutt's synthesis, Review of Radical Political Economics, 27(2), pp. 135-41.
Dumenil, G., Levy, D. (1999): Being Keynesian in the short term and classical in the long term: The traverse to classical long-term equilibrium, The Manchester School, 67(6), pp. 684-716.
Dutt, A. K. (1997): Equilibrium, path dependence and hysteresis in post-Keynesian models, in: Arestis, P., Palma, G., Sawyer, M., eds., Markets, Unemployment and Economic Policy: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, Routledge, London, vol. 2, pp. 238-53.
Dutt, A. K. (2009): Path dependence, equilibrium and economic growth, in: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M., eds., Path Dependency in Macroeconomics. International Papers in Political Economy, Macmillan Palgrave, Houndmills, New York, pp. 119-61.
Harvey, J. T., Garnett, R. F. (2008): Future Directions for Heterodox Economics, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.
Hein, E., Lavoie, M., van Treeck, T. (2011a): Harrodian instability and the `normal rate' of capacity utilisation in Kaleckian models of distribution and growth- a survey, Metroeconomica, forthcoming.
Hein, E., Lavoie, M., van Treeck, T. (2011b): Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: A critical survey, Cambridge Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
Hodrick, R., Prescott, E. C. (1980): Post-war U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation, Discussion Paper 451, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Kalecki, M. (1971): Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lavoie, M. (1996): Monetary Policy in an Economy with Endogenous Credit Money, in: Deleplace, G., Nell, E. J., eds., Money in Motion: The Circulation and Post-Keynesian Approaches, Macmillan, London, pp. 532-45.
Lavoie, M., Rodriguez, G., Seccareccia, M. (2004): Similitudes and Discrepancies in Post-Keynesian and Marxist Theories of Investment: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation, International Review of Applied Economics, 18(2), pp. 127-49.
Shaikh, A. (2007): Economic Policy in a Growth Context: A classical Synthesis of Keynes and Harrod, Working paper, The New School for Social Research.
Skott, P. (2008): Growth, Instability and Cycles: Harrodian and Kaleckian Models of Accumulation and Income Distribution, Working Paper 2008-12, University of Massachusetts.
Skott, P., Ryoo, S. (2008): Macroeconomic implications of financialisation, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6), pp. 827-62.