Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades and the emergence of social assistance in Latin America

Niño-Zarazúa, Miguel (2011): Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades and the emergence of social assistance in Latin America. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the political and economic context under which Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades was introduced to prelude the emergence of social assistance in Latin America. The paper identifies four distinctive features of the programme that were revolutionary in their own right. First, the Progresa-Oportunidades embraced a multidimensional approach to poverty, linking income transfers with simultaneous interventions in health, education and nutrition. Second, the programme focused on the poor. This is in clear contrast to generalised food subsidies and other targeted interventions that dominated the antipoverty agenda in the past. Third, the programme followed a complex system of identification and selection of beneficiaries to prevent discretionary political manipulation of public funds. Finally, an independent impact evaluation protocol proved to be critical for both improving the programme’s effectiveness and strengthening its legitimacy across different political factions and constituencies. The paper concludes that the success of Progresa-Oportunidades must be understood in a broader context, where a harsh economic and political environment, coupled with a rapid democratisation and increasing political competition, laid down the foundations for the introduction and then sustained expansion of the programme

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: social assistance, poverty, human development, Latin America, Mexico
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O54 - Latin America ; Caribbean; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

References

Alderman, H., Hoogeveen, H. & Rossi, M. (2006). Reducing child malnutrition in Tanzania: Combined effects of income growth and program interventions. Economics & Human Biology, 4, 1-23.

Attanasio, O. (2003). Baseline Report on the Evaluation of 'Familias en Acción'. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Attanasio, O., Battistin, E., Fitzsimons, E. & Mesnard, A. (2005). How effective are Conditional Cash transfers? The Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note No. 54. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Barrientos, A. & Hulme, D. (2008). Social Protection for the poor and poorest in developing countries: Reflections on a quiet revolution. BWPI Working Paper No. 30. Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute, University of Manchester.

Barrientos, A. & Neff, D. (forthcoming). Attitudes to poverty in the 'global village’. Social Indicators Research.

Barrientos, A. & Niño-Zarazúa, M. (forthcoming-a). CPRC report. Social Transfers and Chronic Poverty: Objectives, Design, Reach and Impact. Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.

Barrientos, A. & Niño-Zarazúa, M. (forthcoming-b). Financing social protection for children through crises. Development Policy Review.

Barrientos, A., Niño-Zarazúa, M. & Maitrot, M. (2010). Social Assistance in Developing Countries Database (Version 5.0). Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.

Bertranou, F. & Grushka, C. O. (2002). The Non-Contributory Pension programme in Argentina: Assessing the impact on poverty reduction. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

Bertranou, F., Solorio, C. & Van Ginneken, W. (2002). Pensiones no-contributivas y asistenciales. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica y Uruguay. Santiago, Chile: ILO.

Bourguignon, F., Ferreira F. H., F. & Leite, P. G. (2003). Conditional cash transfers, schooling and child labor: micro-simulating Brazil's Bolsa Escola program. The World Bank Economic Review, 17, 229-254.

Cardoso, E. & Portela Souza, A. (2003). The impacts of cash transfers on child labor and school attendance in Brazil. Sao Paolo. Brazil: Department of Economics University of Sao Paolo.

Consejo Nacional De Evaluacion De La Politica De Desarrollo Social (2009). Reporta CONEVAL cifras de pobreza por Ingresos 2008. In Dirección de Información y Comunicación Social (Ed.), Comunicado de Prensa No. 006/09. Mexico City.

Cortes, F., Banegas, I. & Solis, P. (2007). Pobres con oportunidades: Mexico 2002-2005. Estudios Sociologicos, XXV, 3-40.

Dagnino, E., Olvera, A. & Panfichi, A. (2006). Introducción: Para otra lectura de la disputa por la construcción democrática en América Latina. In Dagnino, E., Olvera, A. & Panfichi, A. (Eds.), La Disputa por la Construcción Democrática en América Latina. Mexico City, FCE; CIESAS; UV.

Dahlberg, M. & Johansson, E. (2002). On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments. American Political Science Review, 96, 27-40.

De Brauw, A. & Hoddinott, J. (2008). Must conditional cash transfer programs be conditioned to be effective? The impact of conditioning transfers on school enrollment in Mexico. IFPRI Dicussion Paper No 005757. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

Dion, M. (2000). La economía política del gasto social: el Programa de Solidaridad de México, 1988-1994. Estudios Sociológicos, 53.

Duflo, E. (2000). Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old age pension and intra-household allocation in South Africa. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Dwyer, D. & Bruce, J. (Eds.) (1988). A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Escobar Latapi, A. (2002). The Progresa Programme and social change in rural Mexico. In Haagh, L. & Helø, C. T. (Eds.), Social Policy Reform and Market Governance in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

FAO (2008). Food Outlook, Global Market Analysis. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation.

Filmer, D. & Schady, N. (2009). Are there diminishing returns to transfer size in conditional cash transfers? Policy Research Working Paper 4999. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Fiszbein, A. & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. A World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Freije, S., Bando, R. & Arce, F. (2006). Conditional transfers, labour supply, and poverty: Microsimulating Oportunidades. Economía, 73-124.

Galasso, E. (2006). "With their effort and one opportunity": Alleviating extreme poverty in Chile. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, The World Bank.

Gibson, E. L. & Calvo, E. (2000). Federalism and low-maintenance constituencies: Territorial dimensions of economic reform in Argentina. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35, 32-35.

Gil-Diaz, F. & Carstens, A. (1996). One year of solitude: Some pilgrim tales about Mexico's 1994-1995 crisis. American Economic Review, 86, 164-69.

Glewwe, P. & King, E. M. (2001). The impact of early childhood nutritional status on cognitive development: Does the timing of malnutrition matter? The World Bank Economic Review, 15, 81-113.

Gómez-Hermosillo, R. (2005). Con Oportunidades las Mujeres Mejoran sus Condiciones de Vida e Incrementan su Autonomía. Mexico City: Coordinación Nacional del Programa de Desarrollo Humano Oportunidades.

Grosh, M., Del Ninno, C., Tesliuc, E. & Ouerghi, A. (2008). For Protection and Promotion. The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Hevia De La Jara, F. (2008). Between individual and collective action: Citizen participation and public oversight in Mexico’s Oportunidades programme. IDS Bulletin, 38, 64-72.

Hoddinott, J. & Kinsey, B. (2001). Child Health in the Time of Drought. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 409-436.

Hoddinott, J. & Quisumbing, A. (2003). Methods for microeconometric risk and vulnerability assessments. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 324. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Hoddinott, J., Skoufias, E. & Washburn, R. (2000). The Impact of PROGRESA on Consumption: A Final Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

International Labour Office (ILO) (2001). Social Security. A New Consensus. Geneva: International Labour Office.

International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009). Government Finance Statistics Database. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

International Labour Office (2010). Effects of Non-contributory Social Transfers in Developing Countries: A Compendium. Geneva: ILO.

Levy, S. (2006). Progress against Poverty. Sustaining Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades Program. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Levy, S. & Rodríguez, E. (2004). El Programa de Educación, Salud y Alimentación, PROGRESA –Programa de Desarrollo Humano Oportunidades. In Levy, S. (Ed.), Ensayos Sobre Desarrollo Económico y Social de México. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lindert, K., Linder, A., Hobbs, J. & De La Brière, B. (2007). The nuts and bolts of Brazil’s Bolsa Família program: Implementing conditional cash transfers in a decentralized context. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0709. World Bank.

Maluccio, J. A. & Flores, R. (2004). Impact Evaluation of a Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes: The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

Martinez, S. (2007). Invertir el Bonosol para aliviar la pobreza: Retornos económicos en los hogares beneficiarios. In Aponte, G., Jemio, L. C., Laserna, R., Martinez, S., Molina, F., Schulze, E. & Skinner, E. (Eds.), La Inversión Prudente. Impacto del Bonosol sobre la familia, la equidad social y el crecimiento económico. La Paz, Bolivia: Fundación Milenio.

Molinar Horcasitas, J. & Weldon, J. A. (Eds.) (1994). Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity. San Diego, CA: University of California, Center for US-Mexican Studies, UCSD.

Molyneux, M. (2007). Change and Continuity in Social Protection in Latin America: Mothers at the Service of the State? Programme on Gender and Development. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).

Neufeld, L., Sotres Alvarez, D., Gertler, P., Tolentino Mayo, L., Jimenez Ruiz, J., Fernald, L. C., Villapando, S., Shamah, T. & Rivera Donmarco, J. (2005). Impacto de Oportunidades en el crecimiento y el estado de nutrición de niños en zonal rurales. In Hernández Prado, B. & Hernández Avila, M. (Eds.), Evaluación Externa de Impacto del Programa Oportunidades 2004: Alimentación. Cuernavaca, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública.

Ponce, J. (2008). Education Policy and Performance. Evaluating the Impact of Targeted Education Programs in Ecuador. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.

Ponce, J. & Bedi, A. S. (201009). The impact of a cash transfer program on cognitive achievement: The Bono de Desarrollo Humano of Ecuador. Economics of Education Review, forthcoming29, 116-125.

Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem. Econometrica, 65, 1281-1292.

Schady, N. (2000). The political economy of expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONDES), 1991-1995. American Political Science Review, 94, 288-304.

Schady, N. & Araujo, M. C. (2006). Cash transfers, conditions, school enrolment, and child work: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ecuador. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Schwarzer, H. (2000). Impactos socioeconômicos do sistema de aposentadorias rurais no Brazil – Evidências empíricas de un estudio de caso no estado de Pará. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA (Institute de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada).

Secretaria De Desarrollo Social (2002). Medición de la Pobreza. Variantes metodológicas y estimación preliminar. Documentos de investigación. Mexico City: Comité Técnico para la Medición de la Pobreza.

Skoufias, E. (2005). Progresa and its Impacts on the Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico. Research Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

Skoufias, E. & Di Maro, V. (2005). Conditional Cash Transfers, Adult Work Incentives and Current Poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Soares, F. V., Soares, S., Medeiros, M. & Osório, R. G. (2006). Cash transfer programmes in Brazil: Impacts on inequality and poverty. International Poverty Centre Working Paper. Brasilia: International Poverty Centre.

Soares, S., Guerreiro Osório, R., Veras Soares, F., Medeiros, M. & Zepeda, E. (2007). Conditional cash transfers in Brazil, Chile and Mexico: Impacts upon inequality. International Poverty Centre Working Paper. Brasilia: International Poverty Centre.

Somuano, M. F., Perez Yarahuan, G., Ortega, R., Zavaleta, D., Ponce, O. & Ibarra, J. F. (2006). Analisis de la Vinculation del Gasto de Programas Sociales con Variables Electorales. Monitoreo de Programas Sociales en Contextos Electorales. Mexico, DF: El Colegio de Mexico.

Thomas, D. & Strauss, J. (1997). Health and wages: Evidence on men and women in urban Brazil. Journal of Econometrics, 77, 159-185.

Unicef (2000). A league table of child poverty in rich nations. Innocenti Report Card No 1. Florence: UNICEF.

Wagstaff, A. & Watanabe, N. (2000). Socioeconomic inequalities in child malnutrition in developing world. Policy Research Working Paper 2434. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (2006). World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

World Bank (2010). World Development Indicators. Annual.