Ratcliffe, J and Brazier, J and Tsuchiya, A and Symonds, T and Brown, M (2006): Estimation of a preference based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire (SQOL) using ordinal data. Published in: Health Economics , Vol. 18, No. 11 (November 2009): pp. 1261-1276.
Download (457kB) | Preview
There is increasing interest in using ordinal methods to estimate cardinal values for health states to calculate quality adjusted life years. This paper reports the estimation of models of rank data and discrete choice experiment (DCE) data to derive a preference-based index from a condition specific measure relating to sexual health and to compare the results to values generated from time trade-off valuation (TTO). The DCE data were analysed using a random effects probit model and the DCE predicted values were rescaled according to the highest and lowest predicted TTO values corresponding to the best and worst SQOL health states respectively. The rank data were analysed using a rank ordered logit model and re-scaled using two alternative methods. Firstly, re-scaling the rank predicted values using identical methods to those employed for DCE and secondly, re-scaling the rank model coefficients by dividing each level coefficient by the coefficient relating to death. The study raises some important issues about the use of ordinal data to produce cardinal health state valuations.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Estimation of a preference based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire (SQOL) using ordinal data|
|Keywords:||sexual health, quality of life, preference-based measures|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I19 - Other
|Depositing User:||Sarah McEvoy|
|Date Deposited:||24. Mar 2011 21:59|
|Last Modified:||21. Feb 2013 06:37|
Brazier JE, Deverill M, Harper R, Booth A (1999). A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment 3:(9).
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J (2004). Survey comparing original response choices to items of the SqoL to the levels of the SQoL state classification – Preliminary findings. Report for Pfizer Limited.
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A (2006). The measurement and valuation of health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002). The estimation of a preference based single index measure for health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics 21:271-292.
Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J, Stolk E (2002). Issues in estimating a preference based index for condition specific measures. Presentation at the International Health Economics Association meeting, San Francisco, USA.
Brooks R, Rabin R, De Charro F (2004). The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dowie J (2002). Decision validity should determine whether a generic or condition specific HRQOL measure is used in health care decisions. Health Economics 11:1-8.
Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Torrance GW et al (2002). Multiattribute and single attribute utility function – the Health Utility Index Mark 3 system. Medical Care 40:113-28.
McCabe C, Brazier J, Gilks P, Tsuchiya A, Roberts J, O’Hagan A, Stevens K (2006). Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. Journal of Health Economics 25(3):418-31.
MVH Group (1995). The measurement and valuation of health: Final report on the modelling of valuation tariffs. Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Propper C (1995). The disutility of time spent on the United Kingdom’s National Health Service waiting lists. The Journal of Human Resources 30:677-700.
Revicki DA, Leidy NK, Brennan-Diemer F et al (1998). Integrating patients' preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute asthma symptom utility index. Chest 114:998-1007.
Ryan M, Farrar S (1994). A pilot study of using conjoint analysis to establish the views of users in provision of orthodontic services in Grampian . Health Economics Research Unit Discussion Paper 07/94. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
Ryan M (1996). The application of conjoint analysis in health care. London: Office of Health Economics publications.
Salomon JA (2003) Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data.
Salomon JA, Murray CJ (2004). A multi-method approach to measuring health state valuations. Health Economics 13(3):281-90.
Stolk EA, Busschbach JJV (2003). Validity and feasibility of the use of condition specific outcome measures in economic evaluation. Quality of Life Research 12:363-71.