Kawata, Yukichika (2011): Decision Making under Ecological Regime Shift: An Experimental Economic Approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_30016.pdf Download (258kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Environmental economics postulates the assumption of homo economicus and presumes that externality occurs as a result of the rational economic activities of economic agents. This paper examines this assumption using an experimental economic approach in the context of regime shift, which has been receiving increasing attention. We observe that when externality does not exist, economic agents (subjects of experimemt) act economically rationally, but when externality exists, economic agents avoid the risk of a regime shift that would have negative consequences for others. Our results suggest that environmental economics may have to reconsider the assumption of homo economicus.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Decision Making under Ecological Regime Shift: An Experimental Economic Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | homo economicus, unboundedly rational economic agents, regime shift, experimental economics |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology |
Item ID: | 30016 |
Depositing User: | Yukichika Kawata |
Date Deposited: | 09 Apr 2011 00:43 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 17:51 |
References: | Bastien, C., and Cardoso, J.L. (2007) From homo economicus to homo corporativus: A Neglected Critique of Neoclassical Economics, Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, pp.118~127. Becker, C. (2006) The Human Actor in Ecological Economics: Philosophical Approach and Research Perspectives, Ecological Economics, 60, pp.17~23. Frank, R., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D. (1993) Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, pp.159~171. Frank, R., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D. (1996) Do Economists Make Bad Citizens? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, pp.187~192. Horowitz, J. (2006) The Use of a Real-Money Experiment in a Stated-Preference Survey. In: List, J.A. ed., “Using Experimental Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics”, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, pp.70~90. Kahneman, D. (2003) Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, American Economic Review, 93, pp.1449~1475. Marwell and Ames (1981) Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods, Journal of Public Economics, 15, pp.295~310. Scheffer, M. and Carpenter, S.R. (2003) Catastrophic Regime Shifts in Ecosystems: Linking Theory to Observation, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, pp.648~656. Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., and Walker, B. (2001) Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems, Nature, 413, pp.591~596. Thom, R.F. (1975) Structural Stability and Morphogenesis: An Outline of a General Theory of Models, Reading: Massachusetts (Firstly published in French ‘Stabilité Structurelle et Morphogénèse: Essai D'une Théorie Générale des Modèles’ in 1972; translated by D.H. Fowler into English). Venkatachalam, L. (2008) Behavioral economics for environmental policy, Ecological Economics, 67, pp.640~645. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/30016 |