The determinants of poverty transitions in Europe and the role of duration dependence

Andriopoulou, Eirini and Tsakloglou, Panagiotis (2011): The determinants of poverty transitions in Europe and the role of duration dependence.

Abstract

The paper examines the mobility into and out of poverty and identifies the determinants of poverty spell beginnings and endings in 14 European Countries for the period 1994-2000, using the European Community Household Panel. The first part of the paper offers a snapshot of poverty mobility in Europe calculating the entry and exit poverty rates, along with the conditional, to the duration of spell, exit probabilities and re-entry rates to poverty. In the second part observed characteristics of the household and the household head are examined in order to identify the determinants of the transitions into and out of poverty, taking into account unobserved heterogeneity across individuals and duration dependence. Multivariate discrete hazard analysis is used and the duration dependence is captured with time dummies. In almost all the 14 EU Member-States examined, the probability of exiting (re-entering) poverty is inversely related to the duration of the poverty (non-poverty) spell. The effect is significant to the inclusion of variables capturing observed heterogeneity (socioeconomic characteristics of the household head and the household and particular employment and demographic events), as well as to the inclusion of a random effects factor capturing the unobserved heterogeneity across individuals. With regards to the socio-economic variables, in most countries, households headed by young or elderly individuals, as well as households with dependent children are in higher risk of staying longer in poverty. In many cases, event variables improve the model significantly and highlight the mechanisms that bring individuals into and out of poverty.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Poverty dynamics, EU
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Aassve A, Burgess S, Dickson M, Propper C (2006a) Modelling poverty by not modelling poverty: an application of a simultaneous hazards approach to the UK. CASE Discussion Paper Series No.106, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London

Aassve A, Burgess S, Propper C, Dickson M (2006b) Employment, family union and childbearing decisions in Great Britain. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 169(4):781-804

Abowd J, Card D (1989) On the covariance structure of earnings and hours changes. Econometrica 57(2):411-445

Allison PD (1982) Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In: Leinhardt S (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

Antolin P, Dang T-T, Oxley H, Finnie R, Sceviour R (1999) Poverty dynamics in four OECD countries. Economics Department Working Papers No.212, Economics Department, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris

Bane MJ, Ellwood DT (1986) Slipping into and out of poverty: the dynamics of spells. Journal of Human Resources 21:1-23

Biewen M (2003) Who are the chronic poor? Evidence on the extent and the composition of chronic poverty in Germany. IZA Discussion Paper Series No.779, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn

Biewen M (2006) Who are the chronic poor? An econometric analysis of chronic poverty in germany. In: Creedy J, Kalb G (eds) Dynamics of Inequality and Poverty (Research on Economic Inequality, Volume 13). Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Burgess SM, Propper C (1998) An economic model of household income dynamics, with an application to poverty dynamics among American women. CASE Discussion Paper Series No.9, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London

Callens M, Croux C (2009) Poverty Dynamics in Europe. International Sociology 24(3):368-396

Canto-Sanchez O (1996) Poverty dynamics in Spain: a study of transitions in the late 1990s. Distributional Analysis Research Programme Discussion Papers No.15, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD), London School of Economics, London

Canto O (2003) Finding out routes to escape poverty: the relevance of demographic vs. labor market events in Spain. Review of Income and Wealth 49(4):569-588

Cappellari L, Jenkins SP (2004) Modelling low income transitions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 19:593-610 Damioli G (2010) How and Why the Dynamics of Poverty Differ Across European Countries. St. Gallen, Switzerland

Debels A, Vandecasteele L (2008) The time lag in annual household-based income measures: assessing and correcting the bias. Review of Income and Wealth 54(1):71-88

Devicienti F (2002) Poverty persistence in Britain: a multivariate analysis using the BHPS, 1991-1997. Journal of Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Nationalokonomie S 9:307-340

Devicienti F, Gualtieri V, Rossi M (2010) The dynamics and persistence of poverty: evidence from Italy. No.173, Collegio Carlo Alberto

Dewilde C (2004) Poverty mobility in the Belgian and British welfare regimes: the impact of demographic and labour market events. Research Group on Poverty, Social Exclusion and the City (OASeS), Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp

Duncan GJ (1984) Years of poverty, years of plenty: the changing economic fortunes of American workers and families. Institute for Social Research, Michigan

Duncan GJ, Gustafsson B, Hauser R, Schmauss G, Messinger H, Muffels R, Nolan B, Ray J-C (1993) Poverty dynamics in eight countries. Journal of Population Economics 6(3):215-234

Duncan GJ, Rodgers W (1991) Has children's poverty become more persistent? American Sociological Review 56(4):538-550 Eurostat (2001) Reference periods. ECHP Documentation No.DocPAN E2/SEP/28/2001, European Commission, Eurostat, Social and Regional Statistics and Geographical Information System Directorate (E), Living Conditions Unit (E-2), Luxembourg

Eurostat (2003a) ECHP UDB construction of variables: from ECHP questions to UDB variables. ECHP Documentation No.DocPAN 167/2003-12, European Commission, Eurostat, Social and Regional Statistics and Geographical Information System Directorate (E), Living Conditions Unit (E-2), Luxembourg

Eurostat (2003b) ECHP UDB manual: waves 1 to 8, survey years 1994-2001. ECHP Documentation No.DocPAN 168/2003-12, European Commission, Eurostat, Social and Regional Statistics and Geographical Information System Directorate (E), Living Conditions Unit (E-2), Luxembourg

Finnie R (2000) Low income (poverty) dynamics in Canada: entry, exit, spell durations, and total time. Working paper No. W-00-7E, Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada, Hull, Quebec

Finnie R, Sweetman A (2003) Poverty dynamics: empirical evidence for Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics 36(2):291-325

Fouarge D (2004) Poverty and subsidiarity in Europe. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

Fouarge D, Layte R (2005) Welfare regimes and poverty dynamics: the duration and recurrence of poverty spells in Europe. Journal of Social Policy 34(3):407-426

Gardiner K, Hills J (1999) Policy implication of new data on income mobility. The Economic Journal 109(453):F91-F111 Hansen J, Wahlberg R (2004) Poverty persistence in Sweden. IZA Discussion Paper Series No.1209, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn

Heckman JJ (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. In: Rosen S (ed) Studies in labor markets. Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois

Heckman JJ, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumtions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52(2):271-320

Hill M, Jenkins SP (1999) Poverty among british children: chronic or transitory? In: Bradbury B, Jenkins SP, Micklewright J (eds) The dynamics of child poverty in industrialised countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Honore BE (2002) Non-linear models with panel data. CEMMAP Working Paper No.13, The Institute of Fiscal Studies, London

Huber PJ. (1967) The behaviour of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Paper presented at the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Statistical Laboratory, University of California, California

Jarvis SJ, Jenkins SP (1997) Low income dynamics in 1990s Britain. Fiscal Studies 18(2):123-142

Jenkins SP (1995) Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57(1):129-138

Jenkins SP (1997) sbe17 Discrete-time proportional hazards regression. Stata Technical Bulletin 39(22-32)

Jenkins SP (2000) Modelling household income dynamics. Journal of Population Economics 13:529-567

Jenkins SP (2004) Survival analysis (lecture notes). Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex

Jenkins SP, Rigg JA, Devicienti F (2001) The dynamics of poverty in Britain. Research report No.157, Corporate Document Services for the Department for Work and Pensions, Great Britain Department for Work and Pensions; University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research

Jenkins SP, Schluter C (2003) Why are child poverty rates higher in Britain than in Germany? A longitudinal perspective. The Journal of Human Resources 38(2):441-462

Kelly PJ, Lim LL-Y (2000) Survival Analysis for Recurrent Event Data: An Application to Childhood Infectious Diseases. Statistics in Medicine 19:13-33

Layte R, Whelan CT (2003) Moving in and out of poverty: the impact of welfare regimes on poverty dynamics in the EU. European Societies 2(30):167–191

Lillard LA, Willis RJ (1978) Dynamic aspects of earnings mobility. Econometrica 46(5):985-1012

McKernan S-M, Ratcliffe C (2005) Events That Trigger Poverty Entries and Exits. Social Science Quarterly 86 (supplement):1146-1169

Muffels R, Fouarge D, Dekker R (2000) Longitudinal poverty and income inequality: a comparative panel study for the Netherlands, Germany and the UK. EPAG Working Paper No.1, European Panel Analysis Group, Tilburg

Muffels RJA (2000) Dynamics of poverty and determinants of poverty transitions. Results from the Dutch socioeconomic panel. In: Rose D (ed) Researching social economic change. Routledge, London

Ondrich J, Rhody SE (1999) Multiple spells in the Prentice-Gloeckler-Meyer likelihood with unobserved heterogeneity. Economic Letters 63:139-144

Oxley H, Dang TT, Antolin P (2000) Poverty dynamics in six OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies (30):7-52

Poggi A (2007) Does persistence of social exclusion exist in Spain? Journal of Economic Inequality 5:53-72

Ruggles P, Williams R (1986) Transition in and out of poverty: new data from the survey of income participation. Research Paper, The Urban Institute, Washington

Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Stevens AH (1994) The dynamics of poverty spells: updating Bane and Ellwood. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 84:34-37

Stevens AH (1999) Climbing out of poverty, falling back in: measuring the persistence of poverty over multiple spells. Journal of Human Resources 34(3):557-588

Van Kerm P (2002) How much low income turnover is there in Belgium? Journal of Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Nationalokonomie S9:341-363

Van Kerm P (2004) Une evaluation econometrique des flux et hors de la pauvrete en Belgique. In: Doutrellepont r, Mortelmans D, Casman M-T (eds) Onze ans de vie en Belgique: analyses socio-economiques a partir du panel demographie familiale. Academia Press, Gent

Van Leeuwen J, Pannekoek J (2002) To work oneself out of poverty: the Dutch experience 1989-96. Review of Income and Wealth 48(1):127-140

White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817-830

Willett JB, Singer JD (1995) ‘It’s Déjà Vu All Over Again: Using Multiple-Spell Discrete-Time Survival Analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20:41-67