Kronenberg, Tobias (2011): Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts.
Download (481kB) | Preview
Input-output models are often used in regional science due to their versatility and their ability to capture many of the distinguishing features of a regional economy. Input-output tables are available for all EU member countries, but they are hard to find at the regional level, since many regional governments lack the resources or the will to produce reliable, survey-based regional input-output tables. Therefore, in many cases researchers adopt nonsurvey techniques to derive regional input-output tables (RIOT) on their own. The earliest applications of this type relied on the commodity balance (CB) method, and the simple location quotient (SLQ) method. Over time, numerous variations therefore have been introduced. The latest proposals have been the FLQ method (Flegg and Webber, 2000; Flegg et al., 1995) and the CHARM approach (Kronenberg, 2009). This increasing variety of methods has spawned a stream of literature comparing the relative performance of nonsurvey regionalisation methods. The present paper contributes to that literature by examining a largely neglected problem of nonsurvey techniques: the allocation of imports. In the European System of Accounts (ESA) there are two ways of allocating imports: inside the interindustry transactions matrix or outside. In the latter case, imported products are allocated to the sector that uses them (direct allocation). In the former case, they are allocated as imports in the sector that produces similar goods and as a delivery from that sector to the sector which uses them (indirect allocation). The present paper argues that the choice of a nonsurvey method should depend on the way in which imports are allocated. The argument is explained with reference to the theoretical and empirical literature. It is shown that if the nonsurvey method is not properly chosen the results of the procedure may be misleading and implausible. These findings suggest that LQ methods are better suited for regionalising input-output tables with directly allocated imports, whereas commodity-balance methods like CHARM are better suited for regionalising input-output tables with indirectly allocated imports.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts|
|Keywords:||Regional input-output model; nonsurvey method; location quotient; commodity balance|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C82 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data ; Data Access
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R15 - Econometric and Input-Output Models ; Other Models
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C67 - Input-Output Models
|Depositing User:||Tobias Kronenberg|
|Date Deposited:||08. Jul 2011 16:59|
|Last Modified:||30. Dec 2015 23:21|
Bonfiglio, A. and F. Chelli (2008). 'Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input–Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation', Economic Systems Research, vol. 20(3), pp. 243-258.
Flegg, A. T. and C. D. Webber (2000). 'Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula', Regional Studies, vol. 34, pp. 563-569.
Flegg, A. T., C. D. Webber and M. V. Elliott (1995). 'On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables', Regional Studies, vol. 29(6), pp. 547-561.
Holub, H. W. and H. Schnabl (1994). Input-Output-Rechnung: Input-Output-Analyse, München, Wien: Oldenbourg.
Kronenberg, T. (2009). 'Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling', International Regional Science Review, vol. 32(1), pp. 40-64.
Los, B. (2011). 'The Output of Input-Output Analysis: A Bibliometric Study (1996-2010)', presented at 19th International Input-Output Conference, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Miller, R. E. and P. D. Blair (2009). Input-Output Analysis: foundations and extensions, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, W. I. and P. Smith (1974). 'Nonsurvey Input-Output Techniques at the Small Area Level: An Evaluation', Journal Of Regional Science, vol. 14(1), pp. 1-14.
Richardson, H. W. (1985). 'Input-output and economic base multipliers: Looking backward and forward', Journal Of Regional Science, vol. 25, pp. 607-661.
Schaffer, W. A. and K. Chu (1969). 'Nonsurvey Techniques for Constructing Regional Interindustry Models', Papers of the Regional Science Association, vol. 23, pp. 83-101.
Stäglin, R. (2001) A step by step procedure to regionalized input-output analysis. In Pfähler, W. (Ed.) Regional Input-Output Analysis. Baden-Baden, Nomos.
Tohmo, T. (2004). 'New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers', Regional Studies, vol. 38(1), pp. 43-54.
United Nations (1973). Input-Output Tables and Analysis, New York.