Kronenberg, Kristin (2011): Firm relocations in the Netherlands: Why do firms move, and where do they go?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_32147.pdf Download (494kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study analyzes determinants of business relocation and identifies regional characteristics which attract relocating firms. Results indicate that the relocation decisions of firms are sector-dependent, and the migratory behavior of firms in knowledge-intensive sectors notably differs from that in less knowledge-intensive sectors. Generally, its age and size keep a firm from relocating, whereas firms paying high average salaries have a higher probability to move out of their present location. Relocating firms are generally attracted by densely populated municipalities with high wage levels, and predominantly service firms are drawn to municipalities which are specialized in the firm’s own sector and appeal to individuals, while they avoid moving to municipalities in which only few sectors are present. Sector-specific wages may either attract, or deter firms, suggesting that this variable may capture both the cost and the quality of the locally available workforce.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Firm relocations in the Netherlands: Why do firms move, and where do they go? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | firm relocation, mobility, location choices, nested logit |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R30 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes |
Item ID: | 32147 |
Depositing User: | Kristin Kronenberg |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jul 2011 11:54 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 23:15 |
References: | · Arauzo-Carod JM (2005) Determinants of industrial location: An application for Catalan municipalities. Papers in Regional Science 84 (1): 105-120. · Arauzo-Carod JM (2009) Location determinants of high-tech manufacturing activities: a preliminary analysis. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 2 (1): 23-29. · Arauzo-Carod JM, Viladecans-Marsal E (2009) Industrial Location at the Intra-Metropolitan Level: The Role of Agglomeration Economies. Regional Studies 43 (4): 545-558. · Bartik TJ (1985) Business location decisions in the U.S.: Estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes, and other characteristics of states. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3 (1): 14-22. · Brouwer AE, Mariotti I, van Ommeren JN (2004) The firm relocation decision: An empirical investigation. Annals of Regional Science, 38 (2), 335-347. · Capasso M, Cefis E, Frenken K (2010) Spatial differentiation in industrial dynamics. Utrecht School of Economics, Discussion Paper 10-21. · Carree MA, Verheul I, Santarelli E (2010) Sectoral patterns of firm exit in Italian provinces. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, DOI 10.1007/s00191-010-0191-3, published online 17 September 2010. · Cooke TW (1983) Testing A Model Of Intraurban Firm Relocation. Journal of Urban Economics 13 (3): 257-282. · Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review, 91 (5): 1454–1477. · Erickson RA, Wasylenko M (1980) Firm relocation and site selection in suburban municipalities. Journal of Urban Economics, 8 (1), 69-85. · Figueiredo O, Guimarães P, Woodward D (2002) Home-field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2): 341-361. · Gottlieb PD (1995) Residential Amenities, Firm Location and Economic Development. Urban Studies 32 (9): 1413-1436. · Holl A (2004a) Start-ups and relocations: manufacturing plant location in Portugal, Papers in Regional Science, 83 (4), 649-668. · Holl A (2004b) Manufacturing location and impacts of road transport infrastructure: empirical evidence from Spain. Regional Science and Urban Economics 34 (3):341-363 · King G, Zeng L (2001a) Explaining Rare Events in International Relations. International Organization 55 (3): 693-715. · King G, Zeng L (2001b) Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Political Analysis 9 (2): 137-163. · Knoben J, Oerlemans LAG (2008) Ties that spatially bind? A relational account of the causes of spatial firm mobility. Regional Studies 42 (3): 385-400. · Knoben J, Weterings A (2010) Employment Dynamics on Business Estates. European Planning Studies 18 (7): 1077-1095. · Kohler HP (1997) The effect of hedonic migration decisions and region-specific amenities on industrial location: could Silicon Valley be in South Dakota? Journal of Regional Science 37 (3): 379-394. · List JA (2001) U.S. county-level determinants of inbound FDI: Evidence from a two-step modified count data model. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 (6), 953-973. · Love LL, Crompton JL (1999) The Role of Quality of Life in Business (Re)Location Decisions. Journal of Business Research 44 (3): 211-222. · Pellenbarg PH (2002) Sustainable Business Sites in the Netherlands: A Survey of Policies and Experiences. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45 (1): 59-84. · Pellenbarg PH, Kemper NJ (1999) Industrial mobility in the Netherlands. University of Groningen, SOM Research Report 99d34. · Pellenbarg PH, van Steen PJM (2003) Spatial Perspectives on Firm Dynamics in The Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 94 (5): 620-630. · Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2003) Geography, Industrial Organization, And Agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (2): 377-393. · Schmenner RW (1993) Service Firm Location Decisions: Some Midwestern Evidence. International Journal of Service Industry Management 5 (3): 35-56. · Strauss-Kahn V, Vives X (2009) Why and where do headquarters move? Regional Science and Urban Economics 39 (2); 168-186. · Van Dijk J, Pellenbarg PH (2000) Firm relocation decisions in the Netherlands: An ordered logit approach. Papers in Regional Science 79 (2): 191-219. · Van Wissen L (2000) A micro-simulation model of firms: applications of concepts of the demography of the firm. Papers in Regional Science 79 (2): 111-134. · Wasylenko MJ (1980) Evidence of fiscal differentials and intrametropolitan firm relocation. Land Economics, 56 (3), 339-349. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/32147 |