Polarization versus agglomeration

Martinho, Vítor João Pereira Domingues (2011): Polarization versus agglomeration.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the processes of polarization and agglomeration, to explain the mechanisms and causes of these phenomena in order to identify similarities and differences. As the main implication of this study should be noted that both process pretend to explain the concentration of economic activity and population in certain places, through cumulative phenomena, but with different perspectives, in other words, the polarization with a view of economic development and agglomeration with a perspective of space.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: polarization; agglomeration; economic activity
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

References

G. Myrdal. Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions. Duckworth, London 1957.

N. Kaldor. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press 1966.

N. Kaldor. The Case for Regional Policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. XVII, nº 3 (1970).

N. Kaldor. The Role of Increasing Returns, Technical Progress and Cumulative Causation in the Theory of International Trade and Economic Growth. Économie Appliquée, nº 4 (1981).

A. Young,. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress. The Economic Journal, nº 152, Vol. XXXVIII (1928).

A. Marshall. Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London 1920.

A.K. Dixit and J.E. Stiglitz. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308 (1977).

A .Weber. Urber don Standort der Industrien. T bingen, Germany : J.C.B. Mohr 1909.

W. Christaller. Central Places in Southern Germany. Jena, Germany: Fischer 1933.

A. L sch,. The Economics of Location. Jena, Germany: Fischer 1940.

A. Pred. The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Urban-Industrial Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge 1966.

C. Harris. The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64, 315-348 (1954).

J.V. Henderson. The Size and Types of Cities. American Economic Review, 64, 640-656 (1974).

J.H. von Th nen. Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landtschaft und National konomie. Hamburg 1826.

P. Nijkamp. Fujita (Masahisa), Krugman (Paul) and Venables (Anthony J.). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. The Economic Journal, nº 469, 166-168 (2001).

C. Pavlik. Pavlik on Fujita, krugman, Venables: The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 32, nº 11 , 2087-2088 (2000).

M.N. Jovanovic. M. Fujita, P. Krugman, A.J. Venables - The Spatial Economy. Economia Internazionale, Vol. LIII, nº 3, 428-431 (2000).

A.P. Thirlwall. Growth and Development. 6th ed 1999.

D. Romer and J.A. Frankel. Does Trade Cause Growth?. The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, nº 3, 379-399 (1999).

P. Krugman. Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge 1995.

P. Rosenstein-Rodan. Problems of Industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Economic Journal, 53, 202-211 (1943).

A. Hirschman. The Strategy of Economic Development. Yale University Press 1958.

J.M. Fleming. External Economies and the Doctrine of Balanced Growth. Economic Journal, 65, 241-256 (1955).