The microfinance of reproduction and the reproduction of microfinance: understanding the connections between microfinance, empowerment, contraception and fertility in Bangladesh in the 1990s.

Duvendack, Maren and Palmer-Jones, Richard (2011): The microfinance of reproduction and the reproduction of microfinance: understanding the connections between microfinance, empowerment, contraception and fertility in Bangladesh in the 1990s.

Abstract

Microfinance (MF) and family planning (FP) are thought to be very important interventions in the promotion of human development and it has been suggested that MF has significant beneficent impacts on contraceptive adoption and fertility. Thus, several authors, e.g. Amin, Hill and Li (1995), Amin et al (1994 and 2001); Schuler, Hashemi and Riley (1997); Hashemi, Schuler and Riley (1996); Schuler and Hashemi (1994), using naive methods find that MF in Bangladesh increases contraceptive use and reduces fertility at the individual level, largely because MF empowers women. Pitt et al (1999 – henceforth PKML), however, using instrumental variables (IV) estimation find that MF is associated with decreases in contraceptive use especially when females borrow, and male borrowing decreases fertility, perhaps because fertility increasing income effects of MF outweigh substitution. Steele et al (2001), also using data from Bangladesh from around the same time as the PKML study, come to conclusions closer to the orthodoxy, arguing that PKML use an inappropriate metric for MF programme participation. In this paper we apply matching methods to our reconstruction of the PKML data to test whether other methods reproduce their results. We find that female borrowing substantially increases contraceptive use but has mainly no effects on fertility, while male borrowing has no effect on contraceptive use or on fertility; this contradicts some of the findings of PKML. Our results are shown to be vulnerable to unobservables, but there is no reason to believe that results on IV based methods are more reliable.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Microfinance; family planning; propensity score matching, Bangladesh
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O16 - Financial Markets ; Saving and Capital Investment ; Corporate Finance and Governance; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

References

Amin, R., Ahmed, A. U., Chowdhury, J. & Ahmed, M., 1994. Poor women's participation in income-generating projects and their fertility regulation in rural Bangladesh: Evidence from a recent survey. World Development, 22 (4), p.555-565.

Amin, R., Hill, R. B. & Li, Y., 1995. Poor Women's Participation in Credit-based Self-employment: The Impact on their Empowerment, Fertility, Contraceptive Use, and Fertility Desire in Rural Bangladesh. The Pakistan Development Review, 34 (2), p.93-119.

Amin, R., St. Pierre, M., Ahmed, A. & Haq, R., 2001. Integration of an Essential Services Package (ESP) in Child and Reproductive Health and Family Planning with a Micro-Credit Program for Poor Women: Experience from a Pilot Project in Rural Bangladesh. World Development, 29, p.1611-1621.

Angeles, G., Guilkey, D. K. & Mroz, T. A., 2005. The Effects of Education and Family Planning Programs on Fertility in Indonesia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54, p.165-201.

Armendáriz de Aghion, B. & Morduch, J., 2005. The Economics of Microfinance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Armendáriz de Aghion, B. & Morduch, J., 2010. The Economics of Microfinance, 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ashraf, N., Field, E. & Lee, J., 2010. Household Bargaining and Excess Fertility: An Experimental Study in Zambia. Available at: http://ipl.econ.duke.edu/bread/papers/0910conf/Field.pdf.

Banerjee, A. & Duflo, E., 2011. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 1985. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh 1984-85. Dhaka: People's Republic of Bangladesh.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2004. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh 2004. Dhaka: People's Republic of Bangladesh.

Basu, A., Heckman, J. J., Navarro-Lozano, S. & Urzua, S., 2007. Use of Instrumental Variables in the Presence of Heterogeneity and Self-selection: An Application to Treatments of Breast Cancer Patients. Health Economics, 16 (11), p.1133-1157.

Bateman, M., 2010. Why Microfinance Doesn't Work? The Destructive Rise of Local Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.

Becker, S. O. & Caliendo, M., 2007. Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects. The STATA Journal, 7 (1), p.71-83.

Becker, S. O. and Ichino, A., 2002. Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores. The STATA Journal, 2 (4), p.358-377.

Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G. & Porro, G., 2009. CEM: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata. The STATA Journal, 9, p.524-546.

Burman, L. E., Reed, W. R. et al., 2010. A Call for Replication Studies. Public Finance Review, 38(6), p.787-793.

Buttenheim, A., 2006. Microfinance Programs and Contraceptive Use: Evidence from Indonesia. Working Paper Series, California Center for Population Research, UC Los Angeles, November.

Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S., 2005. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) Discussion Paper No. 1588, May.

Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S., 2008. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22 (1), p.31-72.

Chemin, M., 2008. The Benefits and Costs of Microfinance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies, 44 (4), p.463-484.

Cleland, J., Bernstein, S. et al., 2006. Family Planning: the Unfinished Agenda. The Lancet 368 (9549), p.1810-1827.

Cleland, J., 2009. Contraception in Historical and Global Perspective. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 23(2), p.165-176.

Coleman, B. E., 1999. The Impact of Group Lending in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Development Economics, 60 (1), p.105-141.

Cornfield, J., Haenszel, W., Hammond, E. & Lilienfeld, A., 1959. Smoking and Lung Cancer: Recent Evidence and a Discussion of Some Questions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, p.173-203.

Daley-Harris, S., 2002. State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2002. Available at: http://www.microcreditsummit.org/pubs/reports/socr/2002/socr02_en.pdf.

Deaton, A., 2010. Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development. Journal of Economic Literature 48, p.424-456.

Desai, J. & Tarozzi, A., 2009. Microcredit, Family Planning Programs and Contraceptive Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Ethiopia. Available at: http://ipl.econ.duke.edu/bread/papers/working/247.pdf.

Dewald, W. G., Thursby, J. G. et al., 1986. Replication in Empirical Economics: the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project. American Economic Review, 76, p.587-603.

Dichter, T. and Harper, M. eds., 2007. What's Wrong with Microfinance? Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing.

DiPrete, T. A. & Gangl, M., 2004. Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34 (1), p.271-310.

Duvendack, M., 2010. Smoke and Mirrors: Evidence from Microfinance Impact Evaluations in India and Bangladesh. Unpublished PhD Thesis. School of International Development. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

Duvendack, M. & Palmer-Jones, R., 2011. High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations: Re-investigating the Evidence from Bangladesh. Working Paper 27, DEV Working Paper Series, The School of International Development, University of East Anglia, UK.

Duvendack, M., Palmer-Jones, R. et al., 2011. What is the Evidence of the Impact of Microfinance on the Well-being of Poor People? Forthcoming draft report for DFID, The School of International Development, University of East Anglia, UK.

Fernando, J. L., 1997. Nongovernmental Organizations, Micro-Credit, and Empowerment of Women. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554 (1), p.150-177.

Gaile, G. L. & Foster, J., 1996. Review of Methodological Approaches to the Study of the Impact of Microenterprise Credit Programs. Report submitted to USAID Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services (AIMS), June.

Gertler, P. & Molyneaux, J. W., 1994. How Economic Development and Family Planning Programs Combined to Reduce Indonesian Fertility. Demography, 31, p.33-63.

Goetz, A. M. & Sen Gupta, R., 1996. Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power, and Control Over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24 (1), p.45-63.

Goldberg, N., 2005. Measuring the Impact of Microfinance: Taking Stock of What We Know. Grameen Foundation USA Publication Series, December.

Hamermesh, D. S., 2007. Viewpoint: Replication in Economics. Canadian Journal of Economics, 40 (3), p.715-733.

Hashemi, S. M., Schuler, S. R. & Riley, A. P., 1996. Rural Credit Programs and Women's Empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24 (4), p.635-653.

Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. & Todd, P., 1998. Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data. Econometrica, 66 (5), p.1017-1098.

Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H. & Todd, P., 1998. Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 65 (2), p.261-294.

Heckman, J. J. & Vytlacil, E., 2007. Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part II: Using the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Econometric Estimators to Evaluate Social Programs, and to Forecast Their Effects in New Environments. In Heckman, J. J. & Leamer, E. E., eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 6B. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Ichino, A., Mealli, F. & Nannicini, T., 2006. From Temporary Help Jobs to Permanent Employment: What Can We Learn from Matching Estimators and their Sensitivity? Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) Discussion Paper No. 2149, May.

Jain, S. & Mansuri, G., 2003. A Little at a Time: The Use of Regularly Scheduled Repayments in Microfinance Programs. Journal of Development Economics 72, p.253-279.

Kabeer, N., 2001. Conflicts over Credit: RE-evaluating the Empowerment Potential of Loans to Women in Rural Bangladesh, World Development, 29(1), p.63-84.

Kabeer, N., 2005. Is Microfinance, the ‘Magic Bullet’ for Women’s Empowerment: Analysis of Findings from South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 29/20/2005, p.4709-4718.

Khandker, S. R., 1996. Role of Targeted Credit in Rural Non-farm Growth. Bangladesh Development Studies, 24 (3 & 4).

Khandker, S. R., 2000. Savings, Informal Borrowing and Microfinance. Bangladesh Development Studies, 26 (2 & 3).

Khandker, S. R., 2005. Microfinance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from Bangladesh. The World Bank Economic Review, 19 (2), p.263-286.

Khandker, S. R. & Latif, M. A., 1996. The Role of Family Planning and Targeted Credit Programs in Demographic Change in Bangladesh. World Bank Discussion Papers, 337.

King, G., Nielsen, R., Coberley, C., Pope, J. E. & Wells, A., 2011. Comparative Effectiveness of Matching Methods for Causal Inference. Available at: http://gking.harvard.edu/gking/files/psparadox.pdf.

Karlan, D. & Appel, J., 2011. More than Good Intentions: How a New Economics Is Helping to Solve Global Poverty. London: Penguin.

Latif, M. A., 1994. Programme Impact on Current Contraception in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Development Studies, 22 (1), p.27-61.

Leamer, E. E., 1983. Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics. The American Economic Review, 73 (1), p.31-43.

Leatherman, S., Metcalfe, M., Geissler, K. & Dunford, C., 2011. Integrating Microfinance and Health Strategies: Examining the Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice. Health Policy and Planning, p.1-17.

Leuven, E. and Sianesi, B., 2003. PSMATCH2: STATA Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Matching. Available at: http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.

Littlefield, E., Morduch, J. & Hashemi, S., 2003. Is Microfinance an Effective Strategy to Reach the Millennium Development Goals? CGAP Focus Note 24, January.

Livi-Bacci, M. & de Santis, G., 1998. Population and Poverty in the Developing World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

McCullough, B. D., McGeary, K. A. and Harrison, T. D., 2006. Lessons from the JMCB Archive. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38 (4), p.1093-1107.

McCullough, B., K. A. McGeary, et al., 2008. "Do economics Journal Archives Promote Replicable Research." Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(4), p.1406-1420.

McKernan, S.-M., 2002. The Impact of Microcredit Programs on Self-Employment Profits: Do Noncredit Program Aspects Matter? Review of Economics and Statistics, 84 (1), p.93-115.

Menon, N., 2006. Non-linearities in Returns to Participation in Grameen Bank Programs. Journal of Development Studies, 42 (8), p.1379 - 1400.

Morduch, J., 1998. Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? New Evidence from Flagship Programs in Bangladesh. Unpublished mimeo.

Morgan, S. L. & Winship, C., 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Odell, K., 2010. Measuring the Impact of Microfinance: Taking Another Look. Grameen Foundation USA Publication Series, May.

Pitt, M. M., Khandker, S. R. & Cartwright, J., 2006. Empowering Women with Micro-finance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change, p.791-831.

Pitt, M. M., Khandker, S. R., Chowdhury, O. H. & Millimet, D. L., 2003. Credit Programmes for the Poor and the Health Status of Children in Rural Bangladesh. International Economic Review, 44 (1), p.87-118.

Pitt, M. M., 1999. Reply to Jonathan Morduch’s ‚Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? New Evidence from Flagship Programs in Bangladesh‛. Unpublished mimeo.

Pitt, M. M., 2000. The Effect of Nonagricultural Self-Employment Credit on Contractual Relations and Employment in Agriculture: The Case of Microcredit Programs in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Development Studies, 26 (2 & 3), p.15-48.

Pitt, M. M., 2011a. Overidentification Tests and Causality: A Second Response to Roodman and Morduch. Available at: http://www.pstc.brown.edu/~mp/papers/Overidentification.pdf

Pitt, M. M., 2011b. Response to Roodman and Morduch’s ‚The Impact of Microcredit on the Poor in Bangladesh: Revisiting the Evidence‛. Available at: http://www.pstc.brown.edu/~mp/papers/Pitt_response_to_RM.pdf

Pitt, M. M. & Khandker, S. R., 1998. The Impact of Group-Based Credit Programs on Poor Households in Bangladesh: Does the Gender of Participants Matter? Journal of Political Economy, 106 (5), p.958-996.

Pitt, M. M. & Khandker, S. R., 2002. Credit Programmes for the Poor and Seasonality in Rural Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies, 39 (2), p.1-24.

Pitt, M. M., Khandker, S. R., McKernan, S.-M. & Latif, M. A., 1999. Credit Programs for the Poor and Reproductive Behavior of Low-Income Countries: Are the Reported Causal Relationships the Result of Heterogeneity Bias? Demography, 36 (1), p.1-21.

Ravallion, M., 2001. The Mystery of the Vanishing Benefits: An Introduction to Impact Evaluation. The World Bank Economic Review, 15 (1), p.115-140.

Roodman, D. & Morduch, J., 2009. The Impact of Microcredit on the Poor in Bangladesh: Revisiting the Evidence. Center for Global Development, Working Paper No. 174, June.

Rosenbaum, P. R., 2002. Observational Studies. New York: Springer.

Roy, A., 2010. Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development. Routledge: London.

Rutherford, S., 2009. ASA: Peasant Politics, and Microfinance in the Development of Bangladesh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schuler, S. R. & Hashemi, S. M., 1994. Credit Programs, Women's Empowerment, and Contraceptive Use in Rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 25 (2), p.65-76.

Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M. & Riley, A. P., 1997. The Influence of Women's Changing Roles and Status in Bangladesh's Fertility Transition: Evidence from a Study of Credit Programs and Contraceptive Use. World Development, 25 (4), p.563-575.

Sebstad, J. & Chen, G., 1996. Overview of Studies on the Impact of Microenterprise Credit. Report submitted to USAID Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services (AIMS), June.

Smith, J. A. & Todd, P., 2005. Does Matching Overcome LaLonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125, p.305-353.

Steele, F., Amin, S. & Naved, R. T., 2001. Savings/Credit Group Formation and Change in Contraception. Demography, 38 (2), p.267-282.

Stewart, R., van Rooyen, C., Dickson, K., Majoro, M. & de Wet, T., 2010. What Is the Impact of Microfinance on Poor People? A Systematic Review of Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Technical Report, EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, University of London.

Todd, H., 1996. Women at the Centre. Dhaka: University Press Limited.

UNCDF, 2005. International Year of Microcredit 2005. Available at: http://www.uncdf.org/english/microfinance/uploads/thematic/2005_Final_Report.pdf.

Zeller, M., Sharma, M., Ahmed, A. U. & Rashid, S., 2001. Group-based Financial Institutions for the Rural Poor in Bangladesh: An Institutional- and Household-level Analysis. Research Report of the International Food Policy Research Institute, (120), p.97-100.