Addressing risk challenges in a changing financial environment: the need for greater accountability in financial regulation and risk management

Ojo, Marianne (2011): Addressing risk challenges in a changing financial environment: the need for greater accountability in financial regulation and risk management.

Abstract

The need for continuous monitoring and regulation is particularly attributed to, and justified by, the inevitable presence of risks and uncertainty – both in terms of certain externalities and indeterminacies which are capable of being reasonably quantified and those which are not.

Amongst other goals, this paper aims to address complexities and challenges faced by regulators in identifying and assessing risk, problems arising from different perceptions of risk, and solutions aimed at countering problems of risk regulation. It will approach these issues through an assessment of explanations put forward to justify the growing importance of risks, well known risk theories such as cultural theory, risk society theory and governmentality theory. “Socio cultural” explanations which relate to how risk is increasingly becoming embedded in organisations and institutions will also be considered as part of those factors attributable to why the financial environment has become transformed to the state in which it currently exists.

A consideration of regulatory developments which have contributed to a change in the way financial regulation is carried out, as well as developments which have contributed to the de formalisation of rules and a corresponding “loss of certainty”, will also constitute focal points of the paper. To what extent are risks capable of being quantified? Who is able to assist with such quantification –and why has it become necessary to introduce other regulatory actors and greater measures aimed at fostering corporate governance and accountability into the regulatory process? These questions constitute some of the issues which this paper aims to address.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: risk; financial; regulation; audit; governmentality theory; risk society; cultural theory; hedge funds; uncertainty; legal theory; accountability
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E02 - Institutions and the Macroeconomy; K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G01 - Financial Crises

References

Ahteensuu M ‘Defending the Precautionary Principle Against Three Criticisms” < http://www.kirj.ee/public/trames/ref-tr-07-4-3.htm>

Andersen TJ, Perspectives on Strategic Risk Management (2006) Copenhagen Business School Press

Baldwin R and Cave M, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice (1999) Oxford University Press

Beck U, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (1992) London: Sage Publications

Bonss W, Vom Risiko: Unsicherheit und Ungewissheit in der Moderne (1995) Hamburg: Hamburger Edition

Breyer S, Breaking the Vicious Circle: Towards Effective Risk Regulation (1993) Cambridge Mass

Ciborra C, ‘Digital Technologies and the Duality of Risk’(2004) CARR Discussion Paper No 27, CARR, LSE London

Douglas D, Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory (1992) Routledge

Foucault M, ‘Governmentality’ in G Burchell et al (eds), The Foucault Effect (1991) Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf

Foucault M, ‘Iran: The Spirit of a World without Spirit’, in L. Kritzman (ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture (1988)

Gray J and Hamilton J Implementing Financial Regulation : Theory and Practice( 2006) Wiley 2nd Edition

Hutter B and Power M “Risk Management and Business Regulation”

Luhmann N, Ziegert K and Kastner F, Law as a Social System (2004) Oxford University Press

Morris J, Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle 2000 Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann

Ojo M, Addressing the Inadequacies of Private Law in the Regulation of Contracts – During and Post Contract Formation Periods

Ojo M, Pluralism and Deformalisation as Mechanisms in the Achievement of More Equitable and Just Outcomes – the Move from „Classical Formalism“ to Deformalisation

Ottedal S, Moen B, Klempe H and Rundow T ‘Explaining Risk Perception: An evaluation of Cultural Theory’ < http://www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/Torbjorn.Rundmo/Psychometric_paradigm.pdf>

Packer J and McCarthy C Foucault, Cultural Studies and Governmentality (2003) State University of New York Press

Power M , The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty 2004 Demos

Power M Organized Uncertainty: Designing A World of Risk Management 2007 Oxford University Press

Rothstein H, Huber M and Gaskell G “A Theory of Risk Colonization: The Spiralling Regulatory Logics of Societal and Institutional Risk” (2006) Economy and Society (35) 1

Schrader-Frechette KS, Risk and Rationality 1991 (Berkeley, California)

Singh S, „The Potential of International Law: Fragmentation and Ethics“ Leiden Journal of International Law, 24 (2011)

Van Calster G, ‘Risk Regulation, EU Law and Emerging Technologies: Smother or Smooth?’ <http://www.springerlink.com/content/q14jn1284r4585gg/fulltext.pdf>

Warner F, ‘Calculated Risks’ (1993) Science and Public Affairs

Weber M, FromMaxWeber: Essays in Sociology (trans. H. H. Gerth and C.Wright Mills) (1946), 357

Zinn J, ‘Recent Developments in Sociology of Risk and Uncertainty’ (2005)

http://www.accaglobal.com/publications/studentaccountant/49870

http://www.aicpa.org/download/members/div/auditstd/SAS107.PDF

http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs122.pdf?noframes=1 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/investment/alternative_investments_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/hedgefunds/feedback_statement_en.pdf

http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/08/518&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.

http://www.pobauditpanel.org/downloads/appendixa.pdf> For data and statistics used in the paper: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/hedgefunds/feedback_statement_en.pdf