Impact of the New Approach to Article 102 TFEU on the Enforcement of the Polish Prohibition of Dominant Position Abuse

Kohutek, Konrad (2010): Impact of the New Approach to Article 102 TFEU on the Enforcement of the Polish Prohibition of Dominant Position Abuse. Published in: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies , Vol. Vol. 2, (2010): pp. 93-113.

Abstract

This paper will analyze the impact of the modernized approach to Article 102 TFEU on the application of the prohibition of dominant position abuse contained in Polish competition law. For that purpose, several questions will be answered. Has the consumer-welfare standard already become, or will it become (in particular under the influence of the effects-based approach), the decisive criteria for the finding of a violation of Article 9 of the Polish Competition Act as well as its past equivalents? Will EU’s new approach to the abuse of dominance lead to a reorientation of the goals pursued by Polish competition law on unilateral conduct? Has Polish enforcement practice attached as much emphasis to the protection of market structures as some EU cases that might have justified the accusation of over-enforcement? Has the recent reform introduced any new requirements, standards or tests in the procedural dimension of the application of the ban on the abuse of dominance and if so, to what an extent will they influence the traditional approach employed by Polish antitrust and judiciary institutions? In order to answer these questions, relevant Polish legislation and case-law will be analyzed. The article will try to establish the actual scope of the change relating to substantive as well as procedural rules which will (or should) affect the enforcement of Article 9 of the Polish Competition Act under the impact of the new EU approach.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: abuse of a dominant position; effects-based approach; consumer harm; exclusionary conduct; anticompetitive foreclosure; rule of reason; efficiency-defense; over-enforcement; ‘as efficient competitor’ test; standard of proof
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law

References

Ahlborn Ch.A., Padilla A.J., ‘From Fairness to Welfare. Implications for the Assessment of Unilateral Conduct under EC Competitioon Law’ [in:] Ehlermann C-D., Marquis M. (eds.) European Competition Law Annual 2007. A Reformed Approach to Article 82 EC, Hart Publishing, Portland 2008. Banasiński C., Piontek E (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2009.

Eilmansberger T., ‘Neue Paradigmen im Europäischen Recht?’ (2009) 4 Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht.

Gerber D., Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometeus, Oxford 2001.

Kellerbauer M., ‘The Commission’s new enforcement priorities in applying art. 82 EC to dominant companies’ exclusionary conduct: a shift towards a more economic approach?’ (2010) 31(5) European Competition Law Review.

Kohutek, K., Sieradzka M., Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2008.

Kohutek K., ‘Naruszenie interesu publicznego a naruszenie konkurencji – rozważania na tle praktyk rynkowych dominantów’ [‘Infringement of the public interest and the infringement of competition – considerarions on market practices of dominant firms’] (2010) 7 Państwo i Prawo.

Kohutek K., ‘Zarzut nadużycia pozycji dominującej na rynku usług weterynaryjnych. Glosa do wyroku SN z dnia 19 lutego 2009 r.’ [‘Charge of the abuse of a dominant position in the veterinary services market. Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009’] (2009) 4 Glosa.

Lowe P., ‘The Design of Competition Policy Institutions for the 21st Century – The Experience of the European Commission and DG Competition’ (2008) 3 EC Competition Policy Newsletter.

Mackenrodt M.-O., Gallego B.C., Enchelmaier S. (eds.), Abuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanism?, Berlin – Heidelberg 2008.

Materna, G. Pojęcie przedsiębiorcy w polskim i europejskim prawie ochrony konkurencji, [The notion of undertaking in Polish and European competition law], Warszawa 2009.

Miąsik D., ‘Controlled Chaos with Consumer Welfare as the Winner – a Study of the Goals of Polish Antitrust Law’ (2008) 1(1) YARS.

Miąsik D., Skoczny T., Surdek M. (eds.), Sprawa Microsoft – studium przypadku. Prawo konkurencji na rynkach nowych technologii [Microsoft – case study. Competition law in the technology markets], Warszawa 2008.

Petit N., ‘From Formalism to Effects? The Commission’s Communication on Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 EC’ (2009) 32(4) World Competition.

Ridyard D., ‘The Commission’s article 82 guidelines: some reflections on the economic issues’ 2009 30(5) European Competition Law Review.

Rousseva E., Rethinking Exclusionary Abuses in EU Competition Law, Oxford, Portland, Oregon 2010.

Skoczny T., A. Jurkowska, D. Miąsik (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2009.

Skoczny T., ‘W sprawie modernizacji stosowania zakazu nadużycia pozycji dominującej’ [‘On modernisation of application of the abuse of dominance prohibition’] [in:] C. Banasiński (ed.), Ochrona konkurencji i konsumentów Polsce i Unii Europejskiej [Protection of competition in Poland and in European Union], Warszawa 2005.

Szydło M., Nadużywanie pozycji dominującej w prawie konkurencji [Abuse of a dominant position in competition law], Warszawa 2010.

Whish R., Competition Law, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press 2009.