Faíña, Andres / A. and Lopez-Rodriguez, Jesus / J. and Varela, Laura / L. (2011): Nontaxable income and necessary consumption: the Rousseau’s paradox of fiscal egalitarianism.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_32909.pdf Download (219kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The traditional concept of a strict minimum of necessary consumption and nontaxable income equal for all taxpayers embedded in most current income-tax systems is the result of a paradox of fiscal egalitarianism. The paper shows that substituting the traditional notion of a strict minimum of nontaxable income (Surplus Income Tax Method) for a scheme of growing personal allowances to meet the amounts of necessary consumption required by the different living standards of the taxpayers (Discretionary Income Tax Method) generates an income-tax scheme more progressive than the traditional one. In the paper we also show that this alternative proposal for nontaxable incomes generates an after-tax income distribution less unequal (Lorenz dominance) and superior in terms of social welfare (Atkinson, 1970).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Nontaxable income and necessary consumption: the Rousseau’s paradox of fiscal egalitarianism |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | nontaxable income, necessary consumption, progressivity, tax burden, income distribution |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 32909 |
Depositing User: | A. Faiña |
Date Deposited: | 19 Aug 2011 15:18 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 10:01 |
References: | ATKINSON, A.B. (1970): “On the measurement of inequality”.Journal of economic theory 2, 244-263. ATKINSON, A.B. and BOURGUIGNON, F. (1987): “Income distributions and differences in needs”, in: G.R. Feiwel (Ed. Arrow and Foundation of the Theory of Economic Policy, Macmillan, New York. AUERBACH, A. J. (2006): "Tax reform in the 21st century", James A. Bajer III Institute, Rice University. BANKS, J., and DIAMOND, P. (2008): "The base for direct taxation", prepared for the Report of a Commission on Reforming the Tax Systems for the 21st Century, Mirrlees Report, The Institute of Fiscal Studies. DOMÍNGUEZ MARTÍNEZ, J.M., and LÓPEZ DEL PASO, R. (2008): “El IRPF español en el contexto internacional” en Domínguez Martínez, J.M. (2008): "El nuevo modelo de IRPF tras la reforma de la Ley 35/2006", Analistas Económicos de Andalucía, Málaga. DOMÍNGUEZ MARTÍNEZ, J. M. (2009): “El IRPF ante una encrucijada: opciones de reforma”. Documentos de trabajo 01/2009. Instituto Universitario de Análisis Económico y Social. Universidad de Alcalá. KEEN, M.; PAPAPANAGOS, H. and SHORROCKS, A. (2000). "Tax Reform and Progressivity" Economic Journal, Vol. 110, No. 460, pp. 50-68. KEEN, M.; KIM, Y., and VARSANO, R. (2006): "The flat tax(es): principles and evidence", IMF Working Paper WP/06/218. LAMBERT, P.J. (1993): “The Distribution and Redistribution of Income. A Mathematical Analysis”, 2nd Edition,Manchester University Press, Manchester. MITRA, T., and OK, E.A. (1997): “On the equitability of progressive taxation”. Journal of Economic Theory (73) 316-334. MOYES, P. (2003): “Redistributive effects of minimal equal sacrifice taxation”. Journal of Economic Theory (108) 111-140. MUSGRAVE, R.A. and TUN THIN (1948): “Income tax progression, 1929-48”, Journal of Political Economy, (56), No. 6, pp. 498-514. OCDE (2006): Fundamental reform of personal income tax. OECD Tax Policy Studies,nº 13, París. PIGOU, A.C. (1928): “A Study in Public Finance”. London: Macmillan, Part II, Chap.II. ROUSEEAU, J-J. (1755): “Discurso sobre la Economía política”. Colección Clásicos del Pensamiento. Tecnos (ed.1985). SAMUELSON, P.A. (1947): “Foundations of Economic Analysis” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. SHORROCKS, A.F. (1983): “Ranking income distributions”. Economica, 50, 1-17 SMITH, A., (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by H. Campbell and A. Skinner, textual editor W. B. Todd, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1976, pp. 870-1. STUART MILL, S. (1951): “Principios de economía política”, 2ª ed. in spanish, F.C.E.México, pp. 690-710 TANZI, V.(2009): “Tax Systems in the OECD: Recent evolution, competition and convergence”, Conference on “Tax Systems: Whence and Whiter (Recent evolution,current problems and future challengers)”, Funcas, Málaga. YOUNG, H.P. (1990): “Progressive taxation and equal sacrifice”. American Economic Review, American Economic Association (80) 253–266. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/32909 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Nontaxable income and necessary consumption: the Rousseau’s paradox of fiscal egalitarianism. (deposited 19 Aug 2011 12:45)
- Nontaxable income and necessary consumption: the Rousseau’s paradox of fiscal egalitarianism. (deposited 19 Aug 2011 15:18) [Currently Displayed]