Schilirò, Daniele (2005): Il simposio su "mr. Keynes' system" all'Oxford meeting e il modello is-lm.
Download (287kB) | Preview
The aim of the paper concerns the analysis of the contributions presented by Meade, Harrod and Hicks at the Symposium on Keynes’ General Theory during the Oxford Meeting in September 1936 to stress an important event for the development of macroeconomic theory. Moreover, this paper focuses on Hicks’ IS-LM Model, discussing its origin and its theoretical and methodological implications. It also points out the evolution of Hicks’ thought on some relevant issues as the relationship between Keynes and Marshall and that between Marshall and Walras, the analysis of expectations and of time in his IS-LM model and the liquidity preference theory. The first crucial proposition of the paper is that the contributions by Meade, Harrod and Hicks do not belong to a unique IS-LM approach, because they are analytically different and also differ in methodological terms, moreover Meade and Harrod did not share Hicks’ intellectual background. The second proposition is that the evolution and change of Hicks’ opinion on ISLM model is a signal of discontinuity in his thought, but does not disprove his original attempt of limiting the theoretical content of Keynes’ General Theory within the neoclassical tradition.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Il simposio su "mr. Keynes' system" all'Oxford meeting e il modello is-lm|
|English Title:||The symposium on " mr. Keynes' system" to the Oxford meeting and the is-lm model|
|Keywords:||IS-LM; Hicks; Keynes' system; Aggregate Demand theory; Oxford Meeting|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B22 - Macroeconomics
|Depositing User:||Daniele Schilirò|
|Date Deposited:||28. Aug 2011 11:48|
|Last Modified:||21. Apr 2015 14:08|
Baumol W.J., 1990. Sir John versus the Hicksians, or theorist malgré lui, Journal of Economic Literature, n. 28, pp.1708-1715.
Besomi D. , 2005. The goodwilling outsider. The correspondence between Keynes and Harrod, in M.C. Marcuzzo and A.Rosselli (eds.), Economists in Cambridge, A Study of Their Correspondence, London, Routledge, pp. 92-108.
Blanchard O., 1987. Neoclassical Synthesis, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate e P. Newmann (eds.) The New Palgrave . A Dictionary of Economics, London, Macmillan, vol. III, pp. 634-636.
Blanchard O., 2000. What do we know about macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell did not?, Journal of Political Economy, November, pp. 1375-1409.
Boitani A., 1989. Appunti sulle teorie dell’occupazione, seconda edizione, Milano, Vita e Pensiero.
Champernowne D.G., 1936. Unemployment, Basic and Monetary: The Classical Analysis and the Keynesian, Review of Economic Studies, June, pp. 201-216.
De Vroey M., Hoover K.D., 2004. Introduction: Seven Decades of IS-LM Model, History of Political Economy, Supplement, vol. 36, pp. 1-11.
De Vroey M.. 2004. The History of Macroeconomics Viewed against the Background of the Marshallian-Walras Divide, History of Political Economy, Supplement, vol. 36, pp. 57-91.
Dimand R.W., 2000. Macroeconomics Without IS-LM: A Counterfactual, in Young W., Zilberfarb B.Z. (eds.), IS-LM and Modern Macroeconomics, Boston, Kluwer, pp. 121-131.
Hansen A.H., 1951. Classical, loanable funds, and Keynesian interest theories, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 65, pp. 429-432.
Harrod R.F., 1937. Mr.Keynes and Traditional Theory, Econometrica, January, pp. 74-86.
Hicks J.R., 1934. Leon Walras, Econometrica, October, pp. 338-348.
Hicks J.R.,1935. Wages and Interest: The Dynamic Problem, Economic Journal, September, pp.456-468.
Hicks J.R.,1936. Mr. Keynes’ Theory of Employment, Economic Journal, June, pp. 238-253.
Hicks J.R., 1937. Mr.Keynes and the “Classics”; A Suggested Interpretation, Econometrica, April,pp. 147-159.
Hicks J.R., (1939), 1946. Value and Capital, 2nd ed., Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Hicks J.R., 1965, Capital and Growth, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Hicks J.R., 1972. Autobiography, in AA.VV. Nobel Lectures, Economics 1969-1980, Singapore,World Scientific Publishing.
Hicks J., 1980/81. IS-LM: An Explanation, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics,Winter, pp.139-154.
Hicks J., 1985. Methods of Dynamic Economics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Hicks J., 1989. A Market Theory of Money, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Keynes J.M., 1924. Alfred Marshal,1842-1924, Economic Journal, September, pp.311-372.
Keynes J.M., 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London, Macmillan.
Keynes J.M., 1937a. The General Theory of Employment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, pp. 209-233.
Keynes J.M., 1937b. Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest, Economic Journal, June, pp.241-252.
Keynes J.M., 1973a. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIII, The General Theory and After – Part I Preparation, London, Macmillan.
Keynes J.M., 1973b. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol.XIV, The General Theory and After – Part II Defence and Development, London, Macmillan.
Keynes J.M., 1979. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XXIX, The General Theory and After – A Supplement, London, Macmillan.
Lejionhufvud A., 1994. Hicks, Keynes and Marshall, in Hagemann H. and Hamouda O.F. (eds.), The Legacy of Hicks, London, Routledge, pp. 147-162.
Meade J.E., 1937. A Simplified Model of Mr. Keynes’ System, Review of Economic Studies,February, pp. 98-107.
Modigliani F., 1944. Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money, Econometrica,January, pp. 45-88.
Moggridge D.E., 1976. Keynes, London, Macmillan. Patinkin D., 1956. Money, Interest and Prices, Evanston, Ill., Row Peterson & Co.
Phelps Brown E.H., 1937. Report on the Oxford Meeting, September 25-29, 1936, Econometrica,October, pp. 361-383.
Reddaway B., 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Economic Record, June, pp. 28-36.
Schilirò D., 1987. Il modello IS-LM e la reinterpretazione di Hicks: una nota, Economia Politica, Dicembre, pp. 421-434.
Solow R., 1984. Mr.Hicks and the Classics, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 36, Supplement, pp.1-25.
Young W., 1987. Interpreting Mr.Keynes: The IS-LM Enigma, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Vercelli A., 1999. The evolution of IS-LM models: empirical evidence and theoretical presuppositions, Journal of Economic Methodology, n. 2, pp. 199-219