Maximising policy learning in international committees: Lessons to be learned from the “hidden” committees of the Nordic Council of Ministers

Nedergaard, Peter (2006): Maximising policy learning in international committees: Lessons to be learned from the “hidden” committees of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Published in:

Abstract

In spite of their long history and extensive activities, the international committees of the Nordic Council of Ministers have not hitherto been subject to scholarly examination. This paper demonstrates that valuable lessons can be learned about policy learning in practise and theoretically by analysing the cooperation in the committees of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework as the starting point, fifteen hypotheses on policy learning are tested. Among other things, it is concluded that in order to maximise policy learning in international committees, committees should avoid fragmentation into coalitions, be open to public opinion, participants in committees should be driven by a sense of purpose rather that material interest, empirical data should be made available to committees, a neutral presidency should be present in order to act as an authoritative persuader, and neutral scientists should participate, although not necessarily scientists from consultancy firms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Learning, Advocacy Coalition Framework, Nordic Council of Minister
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General

References

Bennett, C.J. (1997) `Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability ́, Governance 10(3): 213-233.

Haas, P., (1992) `Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Co-ordination ́, International Organization 46(1): 1-37.

Jacobsson, K. (2003) `Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: The Case of EU Employment Policy ́, Paper presented at workshop: The European Union's Open Method of Coordination: Rhetoric, Reality, and the Politics of Policy Reform. Harvard University, April 28, 2003.

Kemp, R. and R. Weehuizen (2005) `Policy Learning: What does it mean and how do we study it ́. Published by NIFU STEP. Norway: Oslo.

Laursen, F. (2003) `Introduction - Theoretical perspectives on comparative regional integration ́, in F. Laursen (ed.) Comparative regional integration: theoretical perspectives, pp. 2-28. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Group.

Nedergaard, P. (2005) `Mutual Learning Proceses of the European Employment Strategy: Theoretical Approaches and Methodologies ́, i T. Bredgaard og F. Larsen (ed.) Employment Policy from Different Angles, pp. 75-94. København: DJØFs Forlag.

Sabatier P. (1993) Policy change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press. Sabatier, P. og Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1999) `The Advocacy Coalition Framework ́, i P. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Political Process, pp. 119-147. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 35

Stone, D. (1999) `Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines ́, Politics 19(1): 51-59.

Tatvis, M. (2003) `Policy Learning and Uncertainty: The Case of Pension Reform in Estonia and Latvia ́, The Policy Studies Journal, 31(4): 643-660.

Warleigh, A. (2004) `In Defence of Intra-disciplinarity: ‘European Studies’, the ‘New Regionalism’, and the Issue of Democratisation ́, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(2). 301-318.

Zeitlin, J. (2005) `Conclusion: The Open Method of Coordination in Action. Theoretical Promise, Empirical Realities, Reform Strategy ́, i J. Zeitlin, P. Pochet og L. Magnusson (ed.)447-504. The OpenMethod of Co-ordination in Action: the European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies