Nedergaard, Peter (2007): The logic of technical standardisation: a politico-economic model. Published in:
Download (345kB) | Preview
In this paper technical standardisation is understood and explained in a model where economic analysis is coupled with an analysis of the political system as proposed in rational choice theory. The aim is to answer both the question why various countries (e.g. the United States versus European countries) let either the market or public intervention determine the mode of technical standardisation and the possible implications of these two ways of organizing technical standardisation from an economic and a political point of view. Based upon the analysis of the paper a couple of general policy recommendations are made concerning the mode of technical standardisation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The logic of technical standardisation: a politico-economic model|
|Keywords:||Rational choice, market failures, technical standards, standardisation, government failures|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook|
|Depositing User:||Peter Nedergaard|
|Date Deposited:||01. Sep 2011 13:03|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 03:54|
Alchian, A.A. (1965) “Some Economics of Property Rights,” 30 Il Politico 816-829. Arthur, W.B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock
(1962) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundation of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Paperbacks.
Buchanan, J.M. (1979) What Should Economists Do? Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
Campbell, J.L. (2004) Institutional Changes and Globalisation. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Coase, R.H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost,” 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1-44.
Elsner, W. (2005) “The ‘new’ Economy: Complexity, Coordination and a Hybrid Governance Approach.” Paper presented at a conference at Roskilde University Center on Institutional Theory, 28-29 April 2005.
Financial Times. Grossman, G.M & E. Helpman (1994) Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Hirschman, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Keohane, R.D. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in World Politics, Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.
Kindleberger, C.P. (1983) “Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods,” 36 Kyklos 377-396.
Kristensen, T. (1988) ”Tekniske standarder som institutioner – nogle teoretiske overvejelser,” in C. Knudsen, ed., Institutionalismen i samfundsvidenskaberne. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
Miller, E.S. (2002) “The Impact of Technological Change on Market Power and Market Failure in Telecommunication,” XXXV Journal of Economic Issues 385-93.
Nedergaard, P. (2006) “Market Failures and Government Failures: A Theoretical Model of the Common Agricultural Policy,” Journal of Public Choice (Forthcoming).
Nedergaard, P. (1994) Internationale standarder. Copenhagen: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.
Niskanen, W.A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Pierson, P. (2000) “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” 94 American Political Science Review 251-267.
Samuelson, P. (1954) “The pure theory of public expenditures,” 36 Review of Economics and Statistics 387-389.
Schmidt, S.K & Werle, R. (1993) Technical Controversy in International Standardisation. Max- Planck-Institut f ̈r Gesellschaftsforschung. Cologne. Discussion Paper 93/5.
Tirole, J. (1992) The Theory of Industrial Organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Weitzel, T & v. Westarp, F. (2002) “From QWERTY to Nuclear Power Reactors: Historic Battles for a Standard,” in K. Geihs et al. ed., Heidelberg Networks, Standardisation, and Applications. New York: Physica.