Nedergaard, Peter (2007): Mutual learning in the European employment strategy: how? how much? Published in:
Download (253kB) | Preview
Mutual learning among the Member States is the primary purpose of the employment policy of the European Union. The two most important questions in this regard are how learning occurs and how much learning takes place. In this article I argue that the existing analyses of the effects of learning in the European employment strategy have been either determined by the sender’s interests or have underestimated how mutual learning between countries takes place. In stead the article develops a constructivist approach to learning and uses it to generate some concrete hypothesis about when learning in committees is most likely to take place. Afterwards, this constructivist approach is used to analyse the institutional framework surrounding the European employment strategy in order to evaluate whether the potential for learning is optimal. Finally, the article concludes that even though some basic premises for learning is fulfilled, the potential for mutual learning could and should be increased by implemented at range of concrete institutional reforms. Firstly, a range of professional and autonomous sub-committees which reports to the EMCO should be established. Secondly, the EMCO should be given more time to discuss the national action plans in meetings which more loosely defined agendas. Thirdly, the cooperation should be concentrated around the areas where the differences in terms of policy performances among the Member States are greatest. Fourthly, the president of the EMCO should be given a more prominent role at the expense of the Commission. Finally, the members of the EMCO should to a higher extent come from the directorates in the Member states rather than the minister’s departments.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Mutual learning in the European employment strategy: how? how much?|
|Keywords:||Mutual learning, European employment strategy,|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General|
|Depositing User:||Peter Nedergaard|
|Date Deposited:||01. Sep 2011 13:04|
|Last Modified:||31. Dec 2015 22:50|
Alesina, A. & R. Perotti (2004). The European Union: a politically incorrect view. NBER Working Paper No. w10342. Harvard University. Institute of Economic Research. Harvard, March 2004
Barbier, Jean-Claude (2004). Research on «Open method of coordination» and national social policies: What sociological theories and methods? Paper for the RC 19 international conference, Centre d’études de l’emploi. Paris, 2-4 september 2004.
Borrás, S. & K. Jacobsson (2004). The Open Method of Co-ordination and New Governance Patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (2), pp. 185-208.
Casey, B.H. & M. Gold (2004). Peer Review of the Labour Market Policies in the European Union: what can countries really learn from one another? Working Paper. Birckbeck College/ London School of Economics/Royal Holloway University of London. London, January 2004.
Checkel, J.T. (1999). Social construction and integration. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4), pp. 545- 560.
Commission (2002). Taking Stock of Five Years of the European Employment Strategy, COM (2002) 416 final.
De Deken, J.J. (2003). The Role of Benchmarking and the Open Method of Co-ordination in the Transformation of the European Welfare Sates. The Case of Old-Age Pensions and Labour Market Reform. Paper prepared for the ESPAnet conference. Copenhagen,13-15 November 2003.
Dolowitz, D.P. & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making, Governance 13 (1), 5-23.
Flockhart, T. (2004). “Masters and Novices”: Socialization and Social Learning through the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. International Relations 18 (3), pp. 361-380.
Gergen, K.J. (1998). Constructionism and Realism: How Are We to Go On? In I. Parker (ed.) Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gergen, K. J. ( 2001). Social Construction in Context. London: Sage Publications.
Haas, E.B. (1990). When Knowledge Is Power. Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Co- ordination, International Organization 46 (1), pp. 1-37.
Jacobsson, K. (2003). Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: The Case of EU Employment Policy, Paper presented at workshop: The European Union's Open Method of Coordination: Rhetoric, Reality, and the Politics of Policy Reform. Harvard University, April 28, 2003.
Lave, J. (1999). Læring, mesterlære, social praksis. In K. Nielsen & S. Kvale (ed.), Mesterlære. Læring som social praksis. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Levy, J. (1994). Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization. 48 (2), pp. 279-312.
Nedergaard, P. (2005a). Transnational Learning Processes: European and Nordic Experiences in the Employment Field (forthcoming).
Nedergaard, P. (2005b). The Open Method of Co-ordination and the Analysis of Mutual Learning Processes of the European Employment Strategy (forthcoming).
Nedergaard, P. (2005c). “Mutual Learning Processes of the European Employment Strategy: Theoretical Approaches and Methodologies”, in T. Bredgaard & F. Larsen (eds.), Employment Policy from Different Angles, Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
Norval, A..J. (2004). Democratic Identification: A Wittgensteinian Approach. Working Paper from Conference on Democratic Network Governance. University of Essex. Essex, 21-22 October 2004.
Nye, J.S., Jr. (1987). Nuclear Learning and U.S.-Soviet Security Regimes. International
Organization 41 (3), pp. 371-402. European Council (2000). Presidency conclusions, Lisbon European Council, 23-24 March 2000.
Sabatier, P.A. & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework. An Assessment. In: Sabatier, P.A.: Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder.
Shotter, J. (1995) In conversation: joint action, shared intentionality, and the ethics of conversation. Theory and Psychology 5, pp. 49-73. Simon, H. (1945). Administrative Behavior. New York, Free Press.
Trubek, D.M. & L.G. Trubek (2003). Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Coordination. Working Paper of the Governance Project. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Center for European Union Studies. Wisconsin Madison, December 2003.
Zeitlin, J. (2004). Introduction: The Open Method of Coordination in Question, in J. Zeitlin & P. Pochet with L. Magnusson (eds.), The Open Method in Action: European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.