Appropriateness of Default Investment Options in Defined Contribution Plans: The Australian Evidence

Basu, Anup and Drew, Michael (2006): Appropriateness of Default Investment Options in Defined Contribution Plans: The Australian Evidence.

Abstract

For participants in defined contribution (DC) plans who refrain from exercising investment choice, plan contributions are invested following the default investment option of their respective plans. Since default investment options of different plans vary widely in terms of their benchmark asset allocation, the most important determinant of investment performance, participants enrolled in these options face significantly different wealth outcomes at retirement. This paper simulates the terminal wealth outcomes under different static asset allocation strategies to evaluate their relative appeal as default investment choice in DC plans. We find that strategies with moderate allocation to stocks are consistently outperformed in terms of upside potential of exceeding the participant’s wealth accumulation target at retirement as well as downside risk of falling below that target outcome by very aggressive strategies whose allocation to stocks approach 100%. The risk of extremely adverse wealth outcomes for plan participants also does not appear to be very sensitive to asset allocation. Our evidence strongly suggests the appropriateness of strategies heavily tilted towards stocks to be nominated as default investment options in DC plans unless plan providers emphasize predictability of wealth outcomes over adequacy of retirement wealth.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Queensland University of Technology
• Language: English
• Keywords: defined contribution; default option; asset allocation; retirement wealth; downside risk
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions ; Financial Instruments ; Institutional Investors; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions

References

Arshanapalli, Bala, T. Daniel Coggin, and William Nelson, 2001, Is fixed-weight asset allocation really better?, Journal of Portfolio Management 27, 27- 38. Artzner, Philippe, Freddy Delbaen, Jean-Marc Eber, and David Heath, 1999, Coherent Measures of Risk, Mathematical Finance 9, 203-228. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2005. Year Book Australia, 2005 (ABS, Canberra). Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, 1999, Superannuation Circular No. II.D.1: Managing Investments and Investment Choice, (APRA, Canberra). Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, 2005, Annual Superannuation Bulletin, (APRA, Sydney). Baker, August J., Dennis E. Logue, and Jack S. Rader, 2005. Managing Pension and Retirement Plans: A Guide for Employers, Administrators, and Other Fiduciaries (Oxford University Press, New York). Balzer, Leslie A., 1994, Measuring investment risk: A review, Journal of Investing 3, 47-58. Bawa, Vijay S., 1975, Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects, Journal of Financial Economics 2, 95-121. Bawa, Vijay S., 1978, Safety first, stochastic dominance, and optimal portfolio choice, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 13, 255-271. Beshears, John, James J. Choi, David Laibson, and Brigitte C. Madrian, 2006, The Importance of default options for retirement savings outcomes: Evidence from the United States, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12009. Blake, David, Alistair Byrne, Andrew Cairns, and Kevin Dowd, 2004, The stakeholder pension lottery: An analysis of the default funds in UK stakeholder pension schemes, Pensions Institute Discussion Paper No. PI-0411. Blake, David, Bruce N. Lehmann, and Allan Timmermann, 1999, Asset allocation dynamics and pension fund performance, Journal of Business 72, 429-461. Bridgeland, Sally, 2002, Choices, choices, Pension Management Institute Trustee Group News 3-5. Brinson, Gary P., Randolph Hood, and Gilbert L. Beebower, 1986, Determinants of portfolio performance, Financial Analysts Journal 42, 39-44. Booth, Philip and Yakoub Yakoubov, 2000, Investment policy for defined-contribution pension scheme members close to retirement: An analysis of the “lifestyle” concept, North American Actuarial Journal, 4, 1-19 Burtless, Gary, 2003, What do we know about the risk of individual account pensions? Evidence from industrial countries, American Economic Review 93, 354-359. Campbell, John Y., and Luis M. Viceira, 2002. Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-term Investors (Oxford University Press, New York). Choi, James J., David Laibson, Brigitte C. Madrian, and Andrew Metrick, 2003, "For better or for worse: Default effects and 401 (k) savings behavior, in David Wise, ed.: Perspectives in the Economics of Aging (University of Chicago Press, Chicago). Cronqvist, Henrik, and Richard H. Thaler, 2004, Design Choices in Privatized Social-Security Systems: Learning from the Swedish Experience, American Economic Review 94, 424-428. Dimson, Elroy, Paul Marsh, and Mike Staunton, 2002. Triumph of the Optimists: 101 Years of Global Investment Returns (Princeton University Press, Princeton). Dowd, Kevin, 2005. Measuring Market Risk (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester). Feinberg, Phyllis, 2004, Lifestyle strategy grows as DC default option, Pensions & Investments 32, 3-4. Fishburn, Peter, 1977, Mean-Risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns, American Economic Review 67, 116-126. Harlow, W.V., and Ramesh K. S. Rao, 1989, Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework: Theory and evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24, 285-312. Jorion, Philippe, 2000. Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (McGraw-Hill, New York). Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky, 1979, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47, 263-291. Kryger, Tony, 1999, The risk of unemployment, Parliament of Australia Research Note 16 (1998-99). Laughhunn, Dan J., John W. Payne, and Roy Crum, 1980, Managerial risk preferences for below-target returns, Management Science 26, 1238-1249. Mao, James C.T., 1970, Models of capital budgeting, E-V vs. E-S, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 5, 657-676. Markowitz, Harry, 1952, Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance 7, 77-91. McEnally, Richard W., 1985, Time diversification: Surest route to lower risk?, Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 24-26. Olsen, Robert A, 1997, Investment risk: The experts' perspective, Financial Analysts Journal 53, 62-66. Poterba, James, Joshua Roth, Steven Venti, and David Wise, 2006, Lifecycle asset allocation strategies and the distribution of 401 (k) retirement wealth, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 11974. Rabin, Matthew, and Richard H. Thaler, 2001, Anomalies: Risk aversion, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 219-232. Richardson, Sue, 2006, Unemployment in Australia, National Institute of Labour Studies Discussion Paper. Roy, A.D., 1952, Safety first and the holding of assets, Econometrica 20, 431-449. Shiller, Robert, 2003, Social security and individual accounts as elements of overall risk-sharing, American Economic Review 93, 343-347. Sortino, Frank, Robert van der Meer, and Auke Plantinga, 1999, The Dutch Triangle, Journal of Portfolio Management 26, 50-58. Sortino, Frank, and Lee N. Price, 1994, Performance measurement in a downside risk framework, Journal of Investing 3, 59-64. Statman, Meir, and Hersh Shefrin, 2000, Behavioral portfolio theory, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35, 127-151. Thaler, Richard H, and J Peter Williamson, 1994, College and university endownment funds: Why not 100% equities?, Journal of Portfolio Management 21, 27. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman, 1991, Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 1039-61. Utkus, Stephen P, 2004, Selecting a default fund for defined contribution plan, Vanguard Centre for Retirement Research 14, 1-19. Yoshiba, Toshino, and Yasuhiro Yamai, 2002, Comparative analyses of expected shortfall and VaR (2): Expected utility maximisation and tail risk, Monetary and Economic Studies 20, 95–116.