Portfolio Choice and Benchmarking: The Case of the Unemployment Insurance Fund in Chile

Castaneda, Pablo (2005): Portfolio Choice and Benchmarking: The Case of the Unemployment Insurance Fund in Chile.

Abstract

A new Unemployment Insurance System based on individual accounts was launched in Chile on October 2002. One of the most interesting features of the system is given by the compensation scheme of the fund manager, which contains a performance based incentive benchmarked to one of the default portfolios of the pension system (pension funds Type E, with a 100% investment in fixed-income securities). This paper studies the portfolio choice problem of a fund manager which is subject to a similar performance-based compensation scheme. We model the portfolio choice problem of a risk averse portfolio manager that must finance an exogenous sequence of benefits, and whose terminal payoff depends upon the terminal value of the portfolio under management, relative to an exogenous benchmark portfolio. Our interest is on the consequences of the incentive scheme over the portfolio that is selected by the portfolio manager. For the Black and Scholes [1973] economy we are able to determine the investment policy in closed form. We show that the riskiness of the portfolio depends on the composition of the benchmark, and that the fund manager is motivated to imitate the investment policy of the benchmark in some random scenarios.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Superintendencia de AFP (Chile)
• Language: English
• Keywords: Benchmark portfolio; Individual accounts; Portfolio choice; Unemployment Insurance
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions

References

[1] BASAK, S., PAVLOVA, A. and A. SHAPIRO (2005): “Offsetting the Incentives: Risk Shifting and Benefits of Benchmarking in Money Management,” Discussion Paper #5006, Centre for Economic Research. [2] BLACK, F. and M. SCHOLES (1973): “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy 81, 637-654. [3] CARPENTER, J. (2000): “Does Option Compensation Increase Managerial Risk Appetite?” Journal of Finance 55, 2311-2331. [4] COX, J. and C.-F. HUANG (1989): “Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Policies when Asset Prices follow a Diffusion Process,” Journal of Economic Theory 49, 33-83. [5] COX, J. and C.-F. HUANG (1991): “A Variational Problem Arising in Financial Economics,” Journal of Mathematical Economics 20, 465-487. [6] DETEMPLE, J.B. (2002): “Asset Pricing in an Intertemporal Partially-Revealing Rational Expectations Equilibrium,” Journal of Mathematical Economics 38, 219-248. [7] DETEMPLE, J.B., GARCÍA, R. and M. RINDISBACHER (2005): “Intertemporal Asset Allocation: A Comparison of Methods,” Journal of Banking & Finance 29, 2821-2848. [8] DETEMPLE, J.B., GARCÍA, R. and M. RINDISBACHER (2003): “A Monte-Carlo Method for Optimal Portfolios,” Journal of Finance 58, 401-446. [9] FERREIRO-YAZIGI, A. (2003): The Chilean Pension System. Superintendencia de AFP: Santiago de Chile. [10] GOETZMANN, W., INGERSOLL, JR., J.E. and S.A. ROSS (2003): “High-Water Marks and Hedge Fund Management Contracts,” Journal of Finance 58, 1685-1717. [11] HODDER, J.E. and J.C. JACKWERTH (2007): “Incentive Contracts and Hedge Fund Management,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (forthcoming). [12] KARATZAS, I. and S. SHREVE (1998): Methods of Mathematical Finance. Springer-Verlag: New York. [13] KARATZAS, I., LEHOCZKY, J. and S. SHREVE (1987): “Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Decisions for a ‘Small Investor’ on a Finite Horizon,” SIAM Journal of Control & Optimization 25, 1557-1586. [14] MERTON, R.C. (1969): “Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case,” Review of Economics & Statistics 51, 247-257. [15] MERTON, R.C. (1971): “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-time Model,” Journal of Economic Theory 3, 373–413. [16] NUALART, D. (1995): The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics. Springer-Verlag: New York. [17] OCONE, D. and I. KARATZAS (1991): “Representation of Optimal Portfolios via Clark’s Formula,” Stochastics & Stochastics Reports 34, 187-220. [18] ROSS, S.A. (2004): “Compensation, Incentives, and the Duality of Risk Aversion and Riskiness,” Journal of Finance 59, 207-225