Sarker, Debnarayan and Chakraborty, Sanjukta (2006): Household decision-making in agricultural labour household: a case study of West Bengal. Published in: Indian Social Science Review , Vol. 7, No. 2 (2006): pp. 55-79.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_33504.pdf Download (281kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper focuses on theoretical issues of gender related to household decision making and examines its empirical validity on agricultural labour households in the context of a particular region of West Bengal. The study suggests that a woman‟s choice and rationality differ significantly from a man‟s. The loci of patriarchal power determines how, where, when and who make the choice. Unlike unitary household model, collective household model, in which a household consists of individuals each of whom is characterized by particular preference, and among whom a collective decision making takes place, seems to be more general. Further, a large unexplained component of intra-occupational wage difference between man and woman is likely to indicate gender discrimination in the intra occupational labour market in which both men and women of a household participate.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Household decision-making in agricultural labour household: a case study of West Bengal |
English Title: | Household Decision-Making in Agricultural Labour Household: A case study of West Bengal |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | collective household model,gender discrimination ,agricultural labour |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 33504 |
Depositing User: | debnarayan sarker |
Date Deposited: | 19 Sep 2011 12:57 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2019 20:19 |
References: | Agarwal, B. (2000): The Idea of Gender Equality: From Legislative Vision to Everyday Family Practice, in Romila Thapar (edn) India: Another Millenium? Viking Agarwal, B. (2004): Challenging Mainstream Economics: „Effectiveness, Relevance and Responsibility‟ Feminist Economics , International Association For Feminist Economics, 14, (3), Special Edition Banerjee, N. (1999): Analyzing women‟s work under patriarchy, in „From Myths to Markets.: Essays on Gender, Edited by K. Sangari and U. Chrakravarti, Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Simla, Manohar Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi. Becker, G.S. (1965): „A Theory of the Allocation of Time‟. Economic Journal, 75 pp.493-517 Becker, G.S. (1981): A Treatise on the Household, Massachusetts; Harvard University Press Becker, G.S. (1985): „Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labour'‟ The Journal of Labour Economics, 3(1),January,pp.535-558 Bell, C.S. (1977): „Economics, Sex and Gender‟ in Women in a Man Made world, eds. Nona Glazer and Helen Y. Wachrer, Chicago, Rand Mc Nally, 1977 Blau, F.D. (1989): “Gender” in J. M. Eatwell, Milgate and P. Newman(Eds). The New Palgrave Social Economics, Macmillan Reference Books Bergmann, B.R. (1986): The Economic Emergence of women, New York, Basic Books Bolin, K.L.J. and L. Bjorn (2001): The Family as the Health Producer – When spouses are Nash Bargainers”, Journal of Health Economics, 20,pp. 349-362 Brown, R.S., Moon, M. and B.S. Zoloth. (1980): “Incorporating Occupational Attainment in Studies of Male/Female Earnings Differentials”, Journal of Human Resources”,15 ,pp.3-28 Cockburn, C. (1983): ‘Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change’, London, Pluto Press Dewan, R. (1999): Gender in Neo-classical Economics: A conceptual Overview, in From Myths to markets: Essays on Gender Edited by S. Sangari and Chakravati, U. Indian Institute of Advance Study, Simla, Manohar Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi Duraisamy, P and M. Duraisamy. (2001): Nash Bargaining Approach to Household Behaviour: Theory and Evidence, The Indian Economic Journal, 48(.4 ),pp.35-40 Elson, D. (2004): „Feminist Economics Challenges Mainstream Macroeconomics‟ ,Feminist Economics ,International Association For Feminist Economics’ ,14,(.3), Special Edition Gabril, P.E. and S. Schmitz. (1989): “The effect of occupation Segregation on the Relative Earnings of Black Males Economics Letters, 30.,pp.77-83 Jean, D. and A. Sen. (1989): ‘Hurger and public Action-Economic Development and social opportunities’ London, Clarendon Press Kabeer, N. (1995): Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought, New Delhi Kali for women Kalpagam, U. (1986): Gender in Economics: „The Indian Experience‟, Economic and Political Weekly,21(41) Kanbur, R. and L. Haddah (1994): „Are Better off Households More or Less, Unequal? A Bargaining Theoretic Approach to „Kuznets Effects at the Micro Level, Oxford Economic Papers ,.46(3), pp.445-458 Kidd, M.P. and M. Shannon. (1994): “An update and Extension of the Cavadian Evidence on Gender wage Differentials”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 27 pp. 918-938 Lundberg, S. and R.A. Pollak (1993): Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market‟, Journal of Political Economy, 101 (6), pp.988-1010 Manser, M. and M. Brown. (1980): „Marriage and Household Decision – Making : A Bargaining Analysis‟ International Economic Review, 21(1) |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/33504 |