How do employment contract reforms affect welfare? Theory and evidence

Tealdi, Cristina (2011): How do employment contract reforms affect welfare? Theory and evidence.

Abstract

Short-term employment contracts have been deployed rapidly across the European Union (EU) in the past two decades. Characterized by a high degree of flexibility, they were thought to be the solution to persistent labor market rigidities and high unemployment rates. The objective of this paper is to investigate both theoretically and empirically the effects of introducing short-term employment contracts to the labor market, and to draw conclusions regarding the change in welfare for different categories of people. Data from the Italian labor market show that workers hired on a short-term basis are mostly young, female, inexperienced, less educated, and poorly qualified. Short-term contracts, which are associated with lower wages, often come in sequences. Labor force participation has increased in particular among older workers. Such changes in labor force composition and transition patterns can be explained by a search model with workers heterogeneity and differentiated contracts. In steady state, a pooling equilibrium of less and more productive workers exists, when only permanent contracts are available. In the presence of short-term contracts, a separating equilibrium allocates less and more productive workers towards different career paths. Through model calibration it is possible to quantify the change in welfare for different categories of workers. Moreover, within a multi-state duration framework, the model is estimated with the Heckman and Singer non-parametric maximum likelihood (NPMLE) estimation procedure. One of the major findings is that inexperienced workers are worse off after the reforms. However, after the accumulation of some work experience, they have the opportunity to compensate for their losses, if they are more productive. Less productive workers, even though provided with higher chances to work, are the ones paying the cost of higher turnover and lower wages.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Labor Economics, Policy
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J08 - Labor Economics Policies; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search

References

1] V Aguirregabiria and C Alonso-Borrego, Labor contracts and flexibility: Evidence from a labor market reform in spain, University of chicago, Department of Economics (1999).

[2] S Bentolila and G Saint-Paul, The macroeconomic impact of flexible labour contracts: an application to spain, ideas.repec.org (1991).

[3] F Berton, The (long) run out of unemployment are temporary jobs the shortest way?, LABORatorio Revelli Working Paper (2008).

[4] F Berton and P Garibaldi, Workers and firm sorting into temporary jobs, LABORatorio R. Revelli (2006).

[5] F Berton F Devicienti and L Pacelli, Temporary jobs: Port of entry, trap, or just unobserved heterogeneity?, LABORatorio Revelli Working Paper (2007).

[6] P Diamond, Wage determination and efficiency in search equilibrium, The Review of Economic Studies (1982).

[7] Laboratorio Revelli Centre for Employment Studies. See http://www.laboratoriorevelli.it/whip, Whip work histories italian panel.

[8] M Guell, The effects of fixed-term contracts on the duration distribution of unemployment: the spanish case, Working paper (2000).

[9] M Guell and B Petrongolo, How binding are legal limits? transitions from temporary to permanent work in spain, Labour Economics (2007).

[10] J Heckman and B Singer, Econometric duration analysis, Journal of Econometrics (1984).

[11] , A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1984).

[12] J Heckman and J Walker, Using goodness of fit and other criteria to choose among competing duration models: A case study of hutterite data, Sociological methodology (1987).

[13] H Hopenhayn and R Rogerson, Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis, The Journal of Political Economy (1993).

[14] J Heckman J Hotz and J Walker, New evidence on the timing and spacing of births, University of Chicago - Population Research Center (1989).

[15] G Giannelli U Jaenichen and C Villosio, Have labour market reforms at the turn of the millennium changed job durations of the new entrants? a comparative study for germany and italy, LABORatorio Revelli Working Paper (2009).

[16] A Landier and O Blanchard, The perverse effects of labor market reform: fixed duration contracts in france, (2001), 1–57.

[17] A Manning and S Machin, Can supply create its own demand? implications for rising skill differentials, European Economic Review (1997), 1–10.

[18] D Mortensen, Job search and labor market analysis, Handbook of Labor Economics (1984).

[19] D Mortensen and C Pissarides, Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment, The Review of Economic Studies 61 (1994), no. 3, 397–415 (eng).

[20] Bank of Italy, Survey on household income and wealth, (1993-2008).

[21] C Pissarides, Equilibrium unemployment theory, Blackwell, Oxford (2009).

[22] P Portugal and J Varejao, Why do firms use fixed-term contracts?, IZA (2003), 1–32.

[23] F Postel-Vinay and P Cahuc, Temporary jobs, employ protection and labor market performance, IZA Discussion Papers (2001).

[24] W Franz S Bentolila, J Dolado and C Pissarides, Labour flexibility and wages: Lessons from spain, Economic Policy (1994).

[25] S Cao S Shao and P Silos, Fixed-term and permanent employment contracts: Theory and evidence, Bank of Canada (2006).

[26] C Tealdi, Review of the italian legislation regarding labor employment contracts, Working paper (2010).

[27] , Short-term employment contracts in italy: Who is the winner?, Working paper (2010).