Giocoli, Nicola (2008): Competition vs. property rights: American antitrust law, the Freiburg School and the early years of European competition policy. Published in: Journal of Competition Law and Economics , Vol. 5, No. 4 (2009): pp. 747-786.
Download (297kB) | Preview
The goal of the paper is to investigate the extent of the influence of American antitrust tradition on the foundation and early years of European competition policy. This as part of a wider research program aiming at assessing the role of economic theory in the development of antitrust law and policy. My argument may be summarized in four propositions. First, by taking into account what I call the “competition versus property rights” dichotomy, it turns out that the economists’ contribution to the historical evolution of US antitrust law has been smaller than usually believed. Second, as far as the foundation of EEC competition policy is concerned, the influence of the American antitrust tradition has, again, been less than what is commonly claimed. Third, a crucial role on the birth of EEC antitrust has been played by a law and economics argument based on the constitutional standing of competition rules, an argument put forward by the highly influential Freiburg School of Ordoliberalism. Fourth, the ordoliberal origin of EEC competition rules, when combined with the Community’s integration goal, helps explain why the impact of the “competition versus property rights” dichotomy on European antitrust law has been limited and, contrary to the US, always solved more favorably to the “competition” pole than to the “property rights” one.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Competition vs. property rights: American antitrust law, the Freiburg School and the early years of European competition policy|
|Keywords:||Antitrust; Freiburg School; Ordoliberalism; property rights; competition law|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics
K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B13 - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Stockholm School)
|Depositing User:||Nicola Giocoli|
|Date Deposited:||30. Sep 2011 16:24|
|Last Modified:||21. Oct 2015 09:23|
BALISCIANO M. 1998, “Hope for America: American notions of economic planning between pluralism and neoclassicism, 1930-1950”, in: Morgan M.S. & Rutherford M. (eds.), From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Durham: Duke University Press, 153-178.
BARBER W.J. 1985, From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists, and American Economic Policy, 1921-1933, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BÖHM F., EUCKEN W. & GROSSMANN-DOERTH H. 1989 , “The Ordo Manifesto of 1936”, in: Peacock A. & Willgerodt H. (eds.), Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution, London: Macmillan, 15-26.
BORK R.H. 1978, The Antitrust Paradox. A Policy at War with Itself, New York: The Free Press.
BRADLEY R.L. JR. 1990, “On the origins of the Sherman Antitrust Act”, Cato Journal, 9 (3), 737-742.
CLARK J.B. 1890, “The ‘trust’: a new agent for doing an old work: or Freedom doing the work of Monopoly”, New Englander and Yale Review, March, 223-230.
CLARK J.B. & CLARK J.M. 1971 , The Control of Trusts. Rewritten and enlarged, New York: A.M. Kelley.
DE LONG J.B. 1990, “In defense of Henry Simons’ standing as a classical liberal”, Cato Journal, 9 (3), 601-618.
DJELIC M.-L. 2002, “Does Europe mean Americanization? The case of competition”, Competition and Change, 6 (3), 233-250.
DJELIC M.-L. 2005, “From local legislation to global structuring frame. The story of antitrust”, Global Social Policy, 5(1), 55-76.
DORFMAN J. 1971, “John Bates Clark and John Maurice Clark on monopoly and competition”, in: CLARK J.B. & CLARK J.M. 1971 .
ERHARD L. 1958, Prosperity through Competition, New York: Praeger.
EUCKEN W. 1992 , The Foundations of Economics – History and Theory in the Analysis of Economic Reality, Berlin & New York: Springer.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2004, EU Competition Policy and the Consumer, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
FETTER F.A. ET AL. 1932, “The economists’ committee on anti-trust law policy”, American Economic Review, 22 (3), 465-469.
FIORITO L. & HENRY J.F. 2005, “John Bates Clark on trusts: new light from the Columbia archives”, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, Università di Siena, n.462.
FULDA C.H. 1965, “The first antitrust decisions of the Commission of the European Economic Community”, Columbia Law Review, 65 (4), 625-645.
GERBER D.J 1998, Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe. Protecting Prometheus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GOLDSCHMIDT N. & BERNDT A. 2003, “Leonhard Miksch (1901-1950) – A forgotten member of the Freiburg School”, Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics, n.03/2.
GOLDSCHMIDT N. 2004, “Alfred Müller-Armack and Ludwig Erhard: social market liberalism”, Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics, n.04/12.
GOYDER D.G. 2003, EC Competition Law, 4th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HAZLETT T.W. 1992, “The legislative history of the Sherman Act re-examined”, Economic Inquiry, 30 (2), 263-276.
IPU (INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION) 1931, “The control of international trusts and cartels”, in: Union Interparlementaire, Compte rendu de la XXVIème Conférence tenue à Londres du 16 au juillet 1930, Paris: Libraire Payot & Cie, 33-34.
KAYSEN C. & TURNER D.F. 1959, Antitrust Policy: An Economic and Legal Analysis, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
KEYNES J.M. 1973 , The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Cambridge: St.Martin’s Press.
KOVACIC W.E. & SHAPIRO C. 2000, “Antitrust policy: a century of economic and legal thinking”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (1), 43-60.
KOVACIC W.E. 1992, “The influence of economics in antitrust law”, Economic Inquiry, 30 (2), 294-306.
LEONARD T. 2006, “American progressivism and the rise of the economist as expert”, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=926635.
LEVY F.H. 1927, “The Sherman law is outworn. It should be amended”, Virginia Law Review, 13 (8), 597-610.
LOVETT A.W. 1996, “The United States and the Schuman Plan. A study in French diplomacy 1950-1952”, Historical Journal, 39 (2), 425-455.
MARTIN S. 2002, Advanced Industrial Economics. Second Edition, Oxford: Blackwell.
MARTIN S. 2004, “Coal and steel: first steps in European market integration”, working paper.
MARTIN S. 2006, “EU competition policy: background”, in: Industrial Organization in Context, on-line textbook, Chapter 4.
MARTIN S. 2007, “Remembrance of things past: antitrust, ideology, and the development of industrial economics”, in: Ghosal V. & Stennek J. (eds.), The Political Economy of Antitrust, Contribution to Economic Analysis, n.282, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 25-57.
MARTIN S. 2007a, “The goals of antitrust policy”, in: Collins W.D. (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, ABA Antitrust Section, forthcoming.
MASON E.S. 1939, “Price and production policies of large-scale enterprises”, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 29 (1), 61-74.
MAYHEW A. 1998, “How American economists came to love the Sherman Antitrust Act”, in: Morgan M.S. & Rutherford M. (eds.), From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Durham: Duke University Press, 179-201.
MIROWSKI P. & HANDS D.W. 1998, “A paradox of budgets: the postwar stabilization of American neoclassical demand theory”, in: Morgan M.S. & Rutherford M. (eds.), From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Durham: Duke University Press, 260-292.
MORGAN M.S. 1993, “Competing notions of ‘competition’ in late Nineteenth-Century American economics”, History of Political Economy, 25 (4), 563-604.
MÖSCHEL W. 1989, “Competition policy from an Ordo point of view”, in: Peacock A. & Willgerodt H. (eds.), German Neo-Liberals and the Social Market Economy, London: Macmillan, 142-159.
MOTTA M. 2004, Competition Policy. Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NERI M. 2007, “Suffering at the hands of the EU antitrust police”, Ludwig von Mises Institute Daily Article, available at http://www.mises.org/story/2440 .
PAGE W.H. 2007, “The ideological origins and evolution of antitrust law”, Collins W.D. (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, ABA Antitrust Section, forthcoming.
PERITZ R.J.R. 1990, “A counter-history of antitrust law”, Duke Law Journal, 2, 263-320.
PERITZ R.J.R. 1996, Competition Policy in America. History, Rhetoric, Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
POSNER R.A. 1999, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
POSNER R.A. 2001, Antitrust Law. Second Edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
REDER M. 1982, “Chicago Economics: permanence and change”, Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 1-38.
RIETER H. & SCHMOLZ M. 1993, “The ideas of German Ordoliberalism 1938-45: pointing the way to a new economic order”, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1 (1), 87-114.
SCHERER F.M. 1990, “Efficiency, fairness, and the early contributions of economists to the antitrust debate”, Washburn Law Journal, 29, 243-255.
SIMONS H.C. 1936, “The requisites of free competition”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 26 (1), 68-76.
SIMONS H.C. 1948 , “A Positive Program for Laissez Faire; Some Proposals for a Liberal Economic Policy”, in: Economic Policy for a Free Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SPAAK P.H. 1956, Rapport des chefs de délégation aux Ministres des Affaires Etrangères (commonly called the Spaak Report), Bruxelles: Comité Intergouvernemental créé par la conférence de Messine (English abridged translation available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/995/).
STIGLER G.J. 1952, “The case against big business”, Fortune, 45 (May), 123 ff.
STIGLER G.J. 1982, “The economists and the problem of monopoly”, American Economic Review, 72 (1), 1-11.
TELSER L.G. 1960, “Why should manufacturers want fair trade?”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (October), 86-105.
THORELLI H.B. 1959, “Antitrust in Europe: national policies after 1945”, University of Chicago Law Review, 26 (2), 222-236.
TRIBE K. 1995, Strategies of Economic Order. German Economic Discourse 1750-1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
VANBERG V.J. 2004, “The Freiburg School: Walter Eucken and Ordoliberalism”, Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics, n.04/11.
WITSCHKE T. 2001, “The first antitrust law in Europe – Success of failure? Origins and application of the merger control policy of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community 1950-1963”, paper presented at the 5th EBHA (European Business History Association) Conference, Oslo, 31st August – 1st September 2001.