Group lending or individual lending? Evidence from a randomised field experiment in Mongolia

Attanasio, Orazio and Augsburg, Britta and De Haas, Ralph and Fitzsimons, Emla and Harmgart, Heike (2011): Group lending or individual lending? Evidence from a randomised field experiment in Mongolia.

Abstract

Although microfinance institutions across the world are moving from group lending towards individual lending, this strategic shift is not substantiated by sufficient empirical evidence on the impact of both types of lending on borrowers. We present such evidence from a randomised field experiment in rural Mongolia. We find a positive impact of access to group loans on food consumption and entrepreneurship. Among households that were offered group loans the likelihood of owning an enterprise increases by 10 per cent more than in control villages. Enterprise profits increase over time as well, particularly for the less-educated. For individual lending on the other hand, we detect no significant increase in consumption or enterprise ownership. These results are in line with theories that stress the disciplining effect of group lending: joint liability may deter borrowers from using loans for non-investment purposes. Our results on informal transfers are consistent with this hypothesis. Borrowers in group-lending villages are less likely to make informal transfers to families and friends while borrowers in individual-lending villages are more likely to do so. We find no significant difference in repayment rates between the two lending programmes, neither of which entailed weekly repayment meetings.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Microcredit; group lending; poverty; access to finance; randomised field experiment
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages

References

B. Armendáriz and J. Morduch (2005), The Economics of Microfinance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

B. Augsburg, R. De Haas, H. Harmgart and C. Meghir (2011), “Microfinance at the margin: Experimental evidence from Bosnia”, mimeo.

A. Banerjee, T. Besley and T. Guinnane (1994), “Thy neighbour's keeper: The design of a credit cooperative with theory and a test”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, no. 2: 491-515.

A. Banerjee, E. Duflo, R. Glennerster and C. Kinnan (2010), “The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomised evaluation”, BREAD Working Paper No. 278.

A. Banerjee and S. Mullainathan (2010), “The shape of temptation: Implications for the economic lives of the poor”, MIT Working Paper.

M. Bateman (2010), Why Doesn't Microfinance Work? The Destructive Rise of Local Neoliberalism, Zed Books, London/New York.

B. Bhole and S. Ogden (2010), “Group lending and individual lending with strategic default”, Journal of Development Economics 91, no. 2: 348-363.

M. Bruhn and I. Love (2009), “The economic impact of banking the unbanked”, World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 4981, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

T. Besley and S. Coate (1995), “Group lending, repayment incentives and social collateral”, Journal of Development Economics 46, no. 1: 1-18.

F. Carpena, S. Cole, J. Shapiro and B. Zia (2010), “Liability structure in small-scale finance. Evidence from a natural experiment”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5427, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

B. Crépon, F. Devoto, E. Duflo and W. Parienté (2011), “Impact of microcredit in rural areas of Morocco: Evidence from a randomised evaluation”, mimeo.

R. Cull, A. Demirguç-Kunt and J. Morduch (2009), “Microfinance meets the market”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 23, no. 1: 167-92.

S. De Mel, D. McKenzie and C. Woodruff (2009), “Are women more credit constrained? Experimental evidence on gender and microenterprise returns”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1-32.

E. Duflo, R. Glennerster and M. Kremer (2008), “Using randomisation in development economics research: A toolkit”, in: Handbook of Development Economics, T. Paul Schultz and J. Strauss (ed.), Chapter 61, Elsevier, 3895-3962.

M. Fafchamps, D. McKenzie, S. Quinn and C. Woodruff (2011), “When is capital enough to get female microenterprises growing? Evidence from a randomised experiment in Ghana”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5706, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

E. Field and R. Pande (2008), “Repayment frequency and default in micro-finance: Evidence from India”, Journal of the European Economic Association 6, no. 2-3: 501-9.

E. Field, R. Pande and J. Papp (2010), “Does microfinance repayment flexibility affect entrepreneurial behavior and loan default?”, mimeo.

G. Fischer (2010), “Contract structure, risk sharing and investment choice”, London School of Economics, mimeo.

S. Gangopadhyay, M. Ghatak and R. Lensink (2005), “Joint liability lending and the peer selection effect”, Economic Journal 115, no. 506: 1005-15.

M. Ghatak (1999), “Group lending, local information and peer selection”, Journal of Development Economics 60, no. 1: 27-50.

M. Ghatak (2000), “Screening by the company you keep: Joint liability lending and the peer selection effect”, Economic Journal 110, 601-631.

M. Ghatak and T. Guinnane (1999), “The economics of lending with joint liability: A review of theory and practice”, Journal of Development Economics 60, 195-228.

X. Giné, P. Jakiela, D. Karlan and J. Morduch (2010), “Microfinance games”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2, 60-95.

X. Giné and D. Karlan (2010), “Group versus individual liability: Long-term evidence from Philippine microcredit lending groups”, mimeo.

A. Enkhamgalan (1995), “The essential problems of Mongolian pastoral reform”, Institute of Agrocultural Economics, Ulaanbaatar.

J.P. Kaboski and R.M. Townsend (2005), “Policies and impact: An analysis of village-level microfinance institutions”, Journal of the European Economic Association 3, no. 1: 1-50.

J.P. Kaboski and R.M. Townsend (2011), “A structural evaluation of a large-scale quasi-experimental microfinance initiative”, Econometrica 79, no. 5: 1357-1406.

D. Karlan and J. Zinman (2011), “Microcredit in theory and practice: Using randomised credit scoring for impact evaluation”, Science 332, no. June: 1278-1284.

S. Khandker (2005), “Microfinance and poverty: Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh”, World Bank Economic Review 19, no. 2: 263–86.

J.-J. Laffont and P. Rey (2003), “Moral hazard, collusion and group lending”, Working Paper No. 122, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.

Mongolian National Statistics Office, Asian Development Bank, and World Bank (2006), Participatory Poverty Assessment Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar.

J. Morduch (1998), “Does microfinance really help the poor? New evidence on flagship programs in Bangladesh”, Princeton University Working Paper.

J. Morduch and D. Roodman (2009), “The impact of microcredit on the poor in Bangladesh: Revisiting the evidence”, Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 174.

M. Pitt and S. Khandker (1998), “The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter?”, Journal of Political Economy 106, no. 5: 958-98.

J. Stiglitz (1990), “Peer monitoring and credit markets”, World Bank Economic Review 4, no. 3: 351-366.

B. Wydick (1999), “Can social cohesion be harnessed to repair market failures? Evidence from group lending in Guatemala”, Economic Journal 109, 463-475.