Hasan, Syed Akif and Subhani, Muhammad Imtiaz and Osman, Ms. Amber (2012): Evil Act: Politics Domination in Higher Education Universities (Empirical Evidence from Pakistan). Forthcoming in: American Journal of Scientific Research
Download (82kB) | Preview
The social interaction taking place in our society is politics. Essential to any governing bodies, institutions etc. this paper’s forte is to specifically assess the politics phenomenon in the academic institutions of higher education. The involvement of politics in the academic society i.e. staff, faculty and employer has been of interest to this study. Politics can be liberal and conservative depending on the individuals running and other perceiving it, which gives birth to the argumentative dialogues, in order to gain power and authority to run the given regime. The survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to the leading higher education universities of Pakistan. There were 3000 respondents (faculty, staff, middle management and top-management). The testing endeavoured to quantify aspects of politics judgment in terms of contribution, appreciation, goals and values, interests, performance, quit, salary, comparison, emotional grudges/cushion for other work colleagues, communication, compensation, gossip, spying, back-biting, professional jealousy, self-esteem, job targets and ethics at academic-oriented work space. One samples T-test and KW test analyzed that staff level employees 50% disagree with the top-management control due to the strong inside and outside political influence over all categories of management. Politics has suppressed the environment and welfare of sound universities, which lay their foundation on transparency, honesty and ethical grounds. It is an alarming situation for universities, which have bad control of politics ruining the administration and overall productivity at work. Policy makers must assess the mal-use of politics in the higher educational sector universities to avoid major fallout of large establishments over a decade, which is creating speculation and dearth of consistent and right administrative and governing systems.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Evil Act: Politics Domination in Higher Education Universities (Empirical Evidence from Pakistan)|
|English Title:||Evil Act: Politics Domination in Higher Education Universities (Empirical Evidence from Pakistan)|
|Keywords:||Politics, Higher education universities, Politicking, Professional Jealously, Ethics|
|Subjects:||A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics|
|Depositing User:||Muhammad Imtiaz Subhani|
|Date Deposited:||02. Jan 2012 12:11|
|Last Modified:||24. Mar 2015 19:15|
Adam, C. (1964).Education, Politics and Development. Comparative Education Review, 7,226-245.
Clinton, O., L., Henry, P., Sims, Jr. George & A. G., Dennis. (1987). Behind the Mask: The politics of Employee Appraisal. The Academy of Management Executive, 1,183-193.
John, A & B., John. (2003).Education and the Politics of Envy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51,320-343.
Powell, J .P. (1974).Universities as Social Critics, Higher Education, 3,149-155.
Rothman, S., S., Lichter, Robert, & N., Nevitte. (2005). Politics and Professional Advancement among College Faculty. The Forum, 3(1), 1-16.
Theodor, H., A., Karl, V. D., Patrick, F., Michael & W., Heribert, (1975).Education: An obstacle to Development? Some Remarks about the Political Functions of Education in Asia and Africa. Comparative Education Review, 19, 68-87.
William, R.J & T., Sarah. (2009). Faculty without Student: Resource Allocation in Higher Education, Economic Perspectives, 23,169-189.