Which conceptual foundations for environmental policies? An institutional and evolutionary framework of economic change

Marletto, Gerardo (2012): Which conceptual foundations for environmental policies? An institutional and evolutionary framework of economic change. Published in: CREI Working Papers No. 1 : pp. 1-19.

Abstract

This paper draws on institutional and evolutionary economics and contributes to an approach to environmental policy which diverges from mainstream prescriptions. The 'socio-technical system' is the core concept: this is a complex made of co-evolving institutions, technologies, markets and actors that fulfils an overall societal need (such as housing, production, mobility, etc.). A systemic and dynamic analysis of those structural changes which are needed to create more sustainable socio-technical systems is provided; actors – and their ability to influence politics and policy – are explicitly taken into consideration. Unsustainable socio-technical systems feature a relevant resistance to change, because they are embedded in the very structure of our society and because of the conservative action of dominant stakeholders; this is why no environmental policy will be effective unless it aims at 'unlocking' our societies from their dominance. But also a constructive side of environmental policy is needed in order to establish new and more sustainable socio-technical systems; consistently, environmental policy is viewed as a combination of actions that can trigger, make viable and align those institutional, technological and economic changes which are needed to reach sustainability. Again, actors (for change) are at the heart of this vision of environmental policy: as subject, because the creation of new and sustainable socio-technical systems is made possible by (coalitions of) actors for change; as object, because environmental policy – to be effective – must actively support the empowerment, legitimation and social networking of such coalitions. A ‘chicken and egg’ problem remains: who comes first? Actors for change advocating policies for sustainability or policies for sustainability supporting actors for change?

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental policy; Economic dynamics; Institutional economics; Evolutionary economics; Socio-technical systems
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Amendola M. and Gaffard J.L. (2006). The Market Way to Riches: Behind the Myth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton

Aoki, M. (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Avelino, F., Rotmans, J. (2009) ‘Power in Transition. An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change’, European Journal of Social Theory, 12: 543-569.

Amendola, M. and Gaffard, J.L. (1998) Out of Equilibrium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Arthur, B.W. (1999) ‘Complexity and the Economy’, Science, 284: 107-109.

Baumol, W.J. and Oates, W.E.. (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark S. and Rickne, A. (2008a) ‘Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis’, Research Policy, 37: 407-429.

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S. and Sandén B. (2008b) ‘'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities': Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20: 575-592.

Bowles, S. (1998) ‘Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 75-111.

Bowles, S., Gintis, H. (2011) A Cooperative Species: Human Sociality and its Evolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bowles, S., Choi, J-K. and Hopfensitz, A. (2003) ‘The co-evolution of individual behaviours and social institutions’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223: 135-147.

Breslin, D. (2011) ‘Interpreting futures through the multi-level coevolution of organizational practices’, Futures, 43: 1020-1028.

Bromley, D.W. (2007) ‘Environmental regultations and the problem of sustainability: Moving beyond «market failure»’, Ecological Economics, 63: 676-683.

Brown, H.S. and Vergragt, P.J., (2008) ‘Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75: 107-30.

Brown, H.S., Vergragt, P. Green, K. and Berchicci, L. (2003) ‘Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15: 291-31

Buehler, R., Jungjohann, A, Keelev, M. and Mehling, M. (2011) ‘How Germany Became Europe’s Green Leader: A Look at Four Decades of Sustainable Policymaking’, Solutions-For a a sustainable and desirable future, October 2011.

Callan, S.J. and Thomas, J.M. (2010) Environmental Economics & Management–Theory, Policy, and Applications, Mason, OH: South-Western.

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., Stern, P.C. (2003) ‘The Struggle to Govern the Commons’, Science, 302: 1907-1912.

Foxon, T.J. (2011) ‘A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy’, Ecological Economics, 70: 2258-2267

Foxon, T.J., Reed, M.S. and Stringer L.C. (2009) ‘Governing Long-Term Social-Ecological Change: What Can the Adaptive Management and Transition Management Approaches Learn from Each Other?’, Environmental Policy and Governance, 19: 3-20.

Frantzeskaki, N. and de Haan H. (2011) ‘Transitions: Two steps from theory to policy’, Futures, 41: 593-606.

Freeman, C. and Pavitt, K. (2002) ‘Editorial’, Research Policy, 31: 1221-1226.

Geels, F.W. (2002) ‘Technological transitions as evolutionary riconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study’, Research Policy, 31: 1257-1274.

Geels, F.W. (2005) Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Coevolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Geels, F.W. (2010) ‘Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective’, Research Policy, 39: 495-510.

Geels, F.W. (2011) ‘The role of cities in technological transitions: analytical clarifications and historical examples’, in: H. Bulkeley, V. Castan Broto, M. Hodson and S. Marvin (eds) Cities and Low Carbon Transitions, Abingdon: Routledge.

Geels, W.F. and Schot, J. (2007) ‘Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways’, Research Policy, 36: 399-417.

Genus, A. and Coles, A. (2008) ‘Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions’, Research Policy, 37: 1436–45

Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gual, M.A. and Norgaard R.B. (2010) ‘Bridging ecological and social systems coevolution: A review and proposal’, Ecological Economics, 69: 707-717.

Hardin, G. (1998) ‘Extensions of the Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 280:682-683.

Haxeltine, A., Whitmarsh, L. and Bergman N. (2008) ‘A Conceptual Framework for transition modelling’, International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 3: 93-114.

Hodgson, G.M. (1993) Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hodgson, G.M. (2000) ‘What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 34: 317-329.

Hodgson, G. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics, London and New York: Routledge.

Hodgson, G.M. (2010) ‘Darwinian coevolution of organizations and the environment’, Ecological Economics, 69: 700-706.

Hodgson, G.M. (forthcoming) From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities: An Evolutionary Economics without Economic Man, Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Hodgson, G.H. and Knudsen, T. (2004) ‘The complex evolution of a simple traffic convention: the functions and implications of habits’, Journal of Economic Behaviors and Organization, 54: 19-47

Hodgson, G.M. and Knudsen, T. (2006) ‘Why we need a generalized Darwinism, and why generalized Darwinism is not enough’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61: 1–19.

Hodgson, G.M. and Knudsen, T. (2010) Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. (2010) ‘Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?’, Research Policy, 39: 477-485.

Holtz, G., Brugnach, M. and Pahl-Wostl, C. (2008) ‘Specifying 'regime'-A framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research’, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 75: 623-643.

Jacobsson, S. and Lauber, V. (2006) ‘The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology’, Energy Policy, 34: 256-276.

Jacobsson, S. and Bergek, A. (2011) ‘Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1: 41-57.

Kallis, G. (2010) ‘Coevolution in water resources development-The vicious cycle of water supply and demand in Athens, Greece’, Ecological Economics, 69: 796-809.

Kallis, G., Norgaard, R.B. (2010) ‘Coevolutionary ecological economic’, Ecological Economics, 69: 690-699.

Kapp, K.W. (1978) The Social Costs of Business Enterprise, 3rd edn, Nottingham: Spokesman.

Kapp, K.W. (2011) The Foundations of Institutional Economics, (Edited by S. Berger and R. Steppacher), Abingdon: Routledge.

Kemp, R., Schot,. J. and Hoogma, R. (1998) ‘Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10: 175-194.

Kemp, R., Geels, W.F. and Dudley, G. (forthcoming) ‘Introduction: Sustainability Transitions in the Automobility Regime and the Need for a New Perspective’, in: W.F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley and G. Lyons (eds) Automobility in Transition? A socio-technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, Abingdon: Routledge.

Kingston, C. and Caballero, G. (2009) ‘Comparing theories of institutional change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5: 151-180.

Köhler J., Whitmarsh L., Nykvist B., Schilperoord M., Bergman N., Haxeltine A. (2009). A transitions model for sustainable mobility. Ecological economics, 68 (12), 2985-2995

Loorbach, D. (2007) Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development, Utrecht: International Books

Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. (2008) ‘Public policies and changing boundaries of firms in a “history friendly model” of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industries’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 67: 355-380.

Manner, M. and Gowdy, J. (2010) ‘The evolution of social and moral behavior: Evolutionary insights for public policy’, Ecological Economics, 69: 753-761.

Markard J. and Truffer B. (2008) ‘Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework’, Research Policy, 37: 596-615.

Marletto, G. (2009) ‘Heterodox environmental economics–Theoretical streams in search of a paradigm’, Economia delle Fonti di Energia e dell'Ambiente, 52: 25-33.

Marletto, G. (2011a) ‘Structure, agency and change in the car regime–A review of the literature’, Trasporti Europei/European Transport, 47: 71-88.

Marletto, G. (2011b) ‘The city as an environment for radical change: The case of low-carbon urban mobility’, paper presented at 2011 AISRE Conference, Turin (I), September 2011.

McCay, B.J. (2002) ‘Emergence of Institutions for the Commons: Contexts, Situations and Events’, in: E. Olstrom (ed.) The Drama of the Commons, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Meadowcroft, J. (2009) ‘What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions’, Policy Science, 42: 323-340.

Meadowcroft, J. (2011) ‘Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1: 70-75.

Metcalfe, J.S. and Ramlogan R. (2006) ‘Restless Capitalism: A Complexity Perspective on Modern Capitalist Economies’, in: E. Garnsey and J. McGlade (eds) Complexity and Evolution. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Murmann, J.P. (2003) Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

Nill, J. and Kemp, R. (2009) ‘Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?’, Research Policy, 38: 668-680.

North, D. (2003) ‘The role of institutions in economic development’, Discussion paper series, no. 2003.2 , Geneva, CH: UNECE.

North, D. (2005) Understanding the process of economic change, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Paavola, J. (2007) ‘Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization’, Ecological Economics, 63: 93-103.

Perez, C. (2002) Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Pierson, P. (2000) ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 94: 251-267.

Rammel, C. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2003) ‘Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising’, Ecological Economics, 47: 121- 133.

Rammel, C., Stagl, S. and Wilfing, H. (2007) ‘Managing complex adaptive systems — A coevolutionary perspective on natural resource management’, Ecological Economics, 63: 9-21.

Safarzynska, K. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M (2010) ‘Evolving power and environmental policy: Explaining institutional change with group selection’, Ecological Economics, 69: 743-752.

Safarzynska, K. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2011) ‘Industry evolution, rationality, and electricity transitions’, Energy Policy, 39: 6440-6452.

Sartorius, C. (2006) ‘Second-order sustainability – conditions for the development of sustainable innovations in a dynamic environment’, Ecological Economics, 58: 268-286.

Schot, J. and Geels, F.W. (2007) ‘Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change. A critical survey of the literature’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17: 605-622.

Scott, W.R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage.

Shove E. and Walker G. (2007) ‘CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management’, Environment and Planning A, 39: 763-770

Smith, A., Stirling, A. and Berkhout, B. (2005) ‘The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions’, Research Policy, 34: 1491-1510.

Sovacool, B.K. (2008) The Dirty Energy Dilemma–What's Blocking Clean Power in the United States, Westport, CT: Preaeger.

Stagl, S. (2007) Emerging Methods for Sustainability Valuation and Appraisal, Final Report, SDRN - Sustainable Development Research Network.

Suurs, R.A.A., Hekkert, M.P., Kieboom, S. and Smits R.E.H.M. (2010) ‘Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel’, Energy Policy, 38: 419-431.

Unruh, G.C. (2000) ‘Understanding carbon lock-in’, Energy Policy, 28: 817-830.

Unruh, G.C. (2002) ‘Escaping carbon lock-in’, Energy Policy, 30: 317–325.

Vanderberg, P. (2002) ‘North’s institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26: 217-235.

van den Bergh J.C.J.M. (2007) ‘Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17: 521-549.

van den Bergh J.C.J.M. and Gowdy J. (2009) ‘A group selection perspective on economic behavior, behavior, institutions and organizations’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72: 1-20.

van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Truffer B. and Kallis G. (2011) ‘Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1: 1-23.

Vatn, A. (2005) Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Vatn, A. (2009) ‘Governing the environment: the institutional economics approach’, Economia delle Fonti di Energia e dell’Ambiente (Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment), 52: 61-86.

Verbong, G.P.J. and Geels, F.W. (2010) ‘Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways’, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77: 1214-1221.

Voss, J.P., Smith, A. and Grin J. (2009) ‘Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management’, Policy Science, 42: 275-302.

Walker, W. (2000) ‘Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations’, Research Policy, 29: 833-846.

Winder, N., McIntosh, B.S. and Jeffrey P. (2005) ‘The origin diagnostic and practical application of coevolutionary theory’, Ecological Economics, 54: 347-361.

Windrum, P. and Birchenhall, C.T. (2005) ‘Structural change in the presence of network externalities: a co-evolutionary model of technological successions’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15: 123-148.

Witt, U. (1992) ‘Evolution as the Theme of a New Heterodoxy in Economics’, in: U. Witt (ed.) Explaining Process and Change–Approaches to Evolutionary Economics, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

Witt, U. (2008) ‘What is specific about evolutionary economics?’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18: 547-575.

Zweynert, J. (2009) ‘Interests versus culture in the theory of institutional change?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5: 339-360.